Shantou City Chenghai District Yinzi Intelligent Electrical Appliance Factory Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report

Supplier: Shantou City Chenghai District Yinzi Intelligent Electrical Appliance Factory
Country/Region: Guangdong, China

Executive Summary

Shantou City Chenghai District Yinzi Intelligent Electrical Appliance Factory is a China-based supplier focused on portable fan and small cooling appliance products, with listed products including handheld pocket fans, USB mini fans, portable turbo cooling fans, and desktop cooling fan products. The supplier shows basic factory capability, with a reported factory area of over 1,000㎡, more than 10 staff, and verified supplier status. Its profile indicates 2 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, a response-time label of ≤4 hours, and an on-time delivery rate of 91.1%.

Commercial performance is relatively active, with 200+ orders and CN¥540.9K+ transaction value in the past six months, supported by a 4.6 store rating and 100+ reviews. However, the company appears to be a small-scale factory based on available staff and area data. Information on full customization capability, finished product inspection, and detailed quality certifications is not provided. This supplier is more suitable for small to mid-sized buyers seeking low-MOQ portable fan products rather than buyers requiring large-scale certified production capacity.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Score Weight: 20 points

Basis

• Factory area: 1,000+㎡
• Employees: 10+ staff
• Supplier verification / factory audit status: True
• Main product scope shown: portable handheld fans, USB mini fans, portable cooling fans, desktop cooling fan products
• MOQ shown for listed products: 1 piece

Elaboration

The supplier has a clearly listed factory base in Guangdong, China, and the provided data confirms a factory size of over 1,000㎡ with more than 10 employees. This indicates that the company has an identifiable production site and basic operational capacity. The verified supplier status adds some credibility to its factory presence.

However, the company scale is relatively small based on the available employee count and factory area. A workforce of 10+ staff and a 1,000+㎡ facility suggest that the supplier may be better positioned for small-batch, flexible, or low-MOQ orders rather than highly complex or very large-volume procurement programs. The product range appears focused on compact electrical cooling products, which supports category specialization, but there is no additional data on production lines, monthly capacity, machinery, R&D team size, or factory management systems.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates basic factory capability and has verified supplier status, which prevents it from being classified as weak or unverified. However, the limited factory area and low staff count place it below a medium-sized stable manufacturing operation. Since the data does not show large-scale production infrastructure, advanced factory certifications, or detailed production capacity, the company should be assessed as a small but functional supplier with basic manufacturing capability.

Final Score

11 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Score Weight: 20 points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Certification / platform labels provided:
• Response time ≤4h
• On-time delivery 91.1%
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators. It is a Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, and has verification status. These elements provide a basic level of platform-backed trust and transaction protection for buyers. Trade Assurance is especially useful for procurement teams because it can help reduce transaction risk related to payment and order fulfillment.

The Gold Supplier duration is 2 years, which indicates some continuity on the platform but does not yet represent a long-established track record. The certification or industry label data is limited to response time and on-time delivery performance. No additional compliance certificates, product safety certifications, management system certifications, or industry-specific regulatory documents are provided in the supplied data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform credibility elements: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verification. These are meaningful indicators for buyer confidence. However, the supplier’s Gold Supplier history is relatively short at 2 years, and the available certification label set is not comprehensive. Because compliance documentation beyond platform verification is not provided, the score should reflect solid but not mature platform credibility.

Final Score

15 / 20

3. Business Performance

Score Weight: 20 points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 200+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥540.9K+
• Store rating: 4.6 / 5.0
• Reviews: 100+

Elaboration

The supplier has visible transaction activity on the platform, with more than 200 orders and over CN¥540.9K in transaction value during the past six months. This demonstrates that the supplier is actively selling and has achieved a measurable level of market validation. The presence of 100+ reviews also indicates that the supplier has accumulated customer feedback rather than operating as a new or inactive store.

The store rating of 4.6 is generally positive, though not at the highest performance tier. The order volume and transaction amount suggest stable small to medium commercial activity. Based on the listed product prices and low MOQs, the business model appears compatible with smaller orders, sample purchases, online retail sourcing, and flexible procurement. However, the data does not demonstrate very high-value enterprise-level transaction volume.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s recent order count and transaction value show meaningful commercial validation. A 4.6 rating and 100+ reviews support buyer confidence, but the rating is not exceptional and the transaction value remains moderate. Therefore, the supplier fits the category of a stable mid-level performer rather than a top-tier high-volume supplier.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Score Weight: 10 points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤4 hours
• Platform label: Response time ≤4h
• Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data
• Communication efficiency beyond response-time label: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier provides a response-time indicator of ≤4 hours, which is acceptable for normal procurement communication and suggests that inquiries are likely to be handled within a reasonable timeframe. This is beneficial for buyers requiring quotation confirmation, order discussion, sample arrangements, or shipment coordination.

However, the supplied data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization. Although one listed product title includes the word “Custom,” product-title wording alone is not sufficient evidence of full customization capability. There is no provided information on OEM/ODM service, logo customization, packaging customization, design support, engineering capability, sample development time, or dedicated sales support.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates acceptable responsiveness but does not meet the highest service tier because the response time is ≤4 hours rather than ≤1 hour, and customization capability is not verified in the provided data. Since service capability is only partially supported by available evidence, the score should remain moderate.

Final Score

6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Score Weight: 10 points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 91.1%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 91.1% is a positive indicator. According to the defined scoring standard, delivery performance above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. This suggests that the supplier has generally reliable shipment execution based on the available platform data.

For buyers, this level of delivery performance is useful when sourcing seasonal or time-sensitive products such as portable fans and cooling devices. However, the data does not provide shipment volume details, average lead time, peak-season performance, logistics methods, or delay dispute records. Therefore, while the available delivery metric is strong, the assessment must remain limited to the provided on-time delivery rate.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier clearly exceeds the 90% benchmark with a 91.1% on-time delivery rate. This supports a high delivery score. However, because the margin above 90% is not large and no additional delivery-management data is provided, the score is placed at the lower end of the 9–10 range.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Score Weight: 20 points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.6 / 5.0
• Reviews: 100+
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: Supplier verification / factory audit status provided as True

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.6 store rating and more than 100 reviews, indicating that it has accumulated meaningful customer feedback. This is a positive signal for general buyer satisfaction. The verified supplier status also adds a basic layer of quality-related credibility because it indicates that the supplier has undergone some form of verification process.

However, the available data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection. There is also no information on product testing standards, defect rate, quality control workflow, incoming material inspection, in-process inspection, final inspection procedures, or after-sales claim handling. For electrical appliance products such as portable fans and cooling devices, these missing details are important for buyers with stricter quality or compliance requirements.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a good rating and a reasonable number of reviews, supported by verification status. This justifies a score above the basic level. Nevertheless, the absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection and detailed quality certifications prevents a high-tier quality score. The rating is positive but not excellent, so the supplier should be considered to have acceptable platform-based quality feedback rather than a fully proven quality assurance system.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Shantou City Chenghai District Yinzi Intelligent Electrical Appliance Factory is suitable for buyers looking for low-MOQ portable fan and small cooling appliance products, especially sample orders, small-batch sourcing, online retail supply, or price-sensitive procurement programs. Its 200+ recent orders, CN¥540.9K+ six-month transaction value, Trade Assurance support, 91.1% on-time delivery rate, and 4.6 rating provide reasonable platform-based confidence.

However, this supplier should be approached with controlled order scaling. The main risks are its small factory scale, limited staff count, lack of provided Finished Product Inspection information, and insufficient data on full customization capability or formal quality certifications. Buyers with strict compliance, large-volume production, or advanced customization requirements should request additional documentation before placing significant orders.

Suggested procurement approach:
Start with sample testing or a small trial order, verify product quality, packaging, delivery consistency, and communication efficiency, then gradually increase order volume if performance is stable. The supplier shows growth potential due to active recent transactions and acceptable delivery performance, but further validation is required before strategic or high-volume cooperation.