C-Cure Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

C-Cure Building Materials Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Hebei, with a reported factory area of 4,800+㎡ and 10+ staff. Based on the provided data, the supplier appears to operate as a relatively small-to-mid-sized manufacturer or trading-oriented supplier with verified supplier status on the platform. Its listed products include customized PU soft leather, basketballs, footballs, and custom printed soccer balls, with very low MOQs ranging from 1 to 2 pieces or bags, making it suitable for small-batch procurement, sample orders, customized trial projects, and buyers seeking flexible order quantities.

The supplier shows strong recent platform business activity, with 500+ orders and CN¥1.6M+ transaction value over the past six months. It also supports Trade Assurance, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, and reports an on-time delivery rate of 94.1%. Key limitations include a short Gold Supplier history of 1 year and a relatively small reported workforce. Overall, it is a commercially active supplier with good platform credibility, but buyers should manage capacity and quality consistency through sample validation and order-by-order inspection.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company name: C-Cure Building Materials Co., Ltd.
• Country/region: China, Hebei
• Factory area: 4,800+㎡
• Employees: 10+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier reports a factory area of over 4,800 square meters, which indicates a physical operational base with a moderate production or warehousing footprint. The company is also marked as a verified supplier, which provides a basic level of platform-backed credibility regarding its company profile or operating presence.

However, the reported employee count is only 10+ staff, which suggests that the company’s internal labor scale may be limited. While the factory area is not insignificant, the small workforce may restrict production capacity, quality control depth, production line specialization, or the ability to handle large-volume orders independently. No additional data is provided regarding production lines, monthly capacity, machinery, factory certifications, export history, or major customer references.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates basic-to-moderate company strength due to its 4,800+㎡ facility and verified supplier status. These elements support the view that it has a real operating base and some level of production or supply capability. Nevertheless, the small staff size prevents it from being classified as a large-scale stable supply chain. The available data does not support a high score in terms of production scale or organizational depth.

Final Score

14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification/industry tags:
• Warranty available
• Finished product inspection
• Full customization
• On-time delivery 94.1%

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators. It is listed as a Gold Supplier and supports Trade Assurance, which helps reduce transaction risk for buyers using the platform. The verified supplier status further strengthens basic trust in the supplier’s profile.

The supplier also carries useful service and compliance-related tags, including warranty availability, finished product inspection, and full customization. These tags indicate that the supplier has some declared quality and service support mechanisms. However, the Gold Supplier duration is only 1 year, which is relatively short and does not yet demonstrate long-term platform stability. No independent third-party certifications, product compliance certificates, audit reports, or international quality management certifications are provided in the dataset.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a solid platform foundation: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and several useful operational tags. These are meaningful credibility signals. However, the supplier’s platform history is still short at only 1 year, and the provided data does not show deeper compliance documentation or long-term certification records. Therefore, the supplier fits the category of having core platform credibility but limited tenure.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 500+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥1.6M+
• Store rating: 4.6
• Reviews: 100+

Elaboration

The supplier shows strong recent commercial activity on the platform. More than 500 orders over the past six months indicates a high level of buyer engagement and repeat marketplace exposure. A transaction value of CN¥1.6M+ over the same period also suggests that the supplier has completed a meaningful volume of business, rather than only receiving inquiries or small isolated transactions.

The store rating of 4.6 is positive, though not at the very top level. The review count of 100+ provides a reasonable amount of customer feedback for reference. This combination of order volume, transaction value, rating, and review base supports the view that the supplier is commercially active and has passed a certain level of market validation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves a strong score in business performance because the past-six-month data shows both high order activity and substantial transaction value. The 4.6 rating is good, and the 100+ reviews provide enough feedback volume to support basic confidence. The score is not maximized because the rating is good rather than excellent, and no additional data is provided on repeat customers, dispute rate, refund rate, or buyer segmentation.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Response time: ≤2h
• Full customization: Listed as available

Elaboration

The supplier reports a communication response time of within 2 hours, which is acceptable for international B2B communication and suggests a relatively active sales or customer service function. The presence of “Full customization” is also important, especially because the listed products include custom printed soccer balls and customized PU soft leather. This makes the supplier potentially suitable for buyers needing private-label, customized design, or small-batch product adaptation.

However, the response time is not within 1 hour, which would indicate the highest level of responsiveness under the scoring standard. Also, no further information is provided regarding languages supported, technical design assistance, sample development time, after-sales process, or dedicated account management.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has good but not top-tier service indicators. A response time of ≤2h is commercially acceptable, and full customization capability adds value for buyers requiring product differentiation. Because the response time does not meet the ≤1h threshold for the highest score, and because deeper service-process details are not provided, a mid-to-high service score is appropriate.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 94.1%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 94.1%, which falls above the 90% benchmark. This indicates that, based on the available platform data, the supplier generally performs well in meeting agreed shipment timelines. For procurement teams, this is a positive indicator, particularly for buyers managing seasonal demand, promotional schedules, or replenishment cycles.

However, the data does not specify the number of shipments behind this percentage, whether delays occurred in peak periods, or how performance varies by product type or order size. Therefore, while the percentage is strong, further verification would be advisable before placing large or time-sensitive orders.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for a high score. The supplier’s 94.1% performance supports a strong delivery rating. The score is not set at the absolute maximum because no supporting details are provided regarding shipment volume, delay causes, or logistics consistency across different order types.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.6
• Reviews: 100+
• Finished product inspection: Listed as available
• Verified supplier: True
• Warranty available: Listed as available

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.6 store rating and more than 100 reviews, which provides a reasonable customer feedback base. The rating suggests generally positive buyer satisfaction, though it is not perfect. The presence of Finished Product Inspection is a valuable quality-control indicator because it suggests that inspection is available before shipment. Warranty availability also adds some post-sale support value.

Verified supplier status contributes to quality credibility at the company-profile level, but the provided data does not include specific product test reports, inspection standards, defect rates, quality certifications, compliance documents, or third-party audit details. Therefore, quality assurance appears to be present at a basic-to-good platform level, but not fully proven through detailed technical documentation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has good customer feedback indicators and useful quality-related tags, especially Finished Product Inspection and warranty availability. The 100+ reviews provide a meaningful feedback sample, and the 4.6 rating supports overall buyer satisfaction. However, the absence of detailed quality certifications, product compliance evidence, and defect-rate data prevents a top-tier quality score.

Final Score

17 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

C-Cure Building Materials Co., Ltd. shows good platform activity, strong recent order performance, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, full customization capability, finished product inspection, and a high on-time delivery rate of 94.1%. These indicators make it suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ sourcing, customized products, sample orders, trial cooperation, private-label development, or medium-small batch procurement.

Suitable customer types:
- Small and medium-sized importers
- E-commerce sellers
- Buyers requiring low MOQ orders
- Custom sports product buyers
- Buyers needing sample-based validation before scaling

Main risk points:
- Gold Supplier history is only 1 year
- Reported workforce is limited at 10+ staff
- No detailed production capacity, machinery, audit reports, or product compliance certificates provided
- Quality data is based mainly on platform rating, reviews, and inspection tags

Growth potential:
The supplier has clear commercial momentum, with 500+ orders and CN¥1.6M+ transaction value in the past six months. If it continues improving platform history, quality documentation, production transparency, and certification completeness, it may become more suitable for larger-volume or longer-term procurement programs. For now, buyers should start with samples or small trial orders, use Trade Assurance, request finished product inspection, and confirm capacity before placing large orders.