zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Luoyou Compressor (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

11.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Luoyou Compressor (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. is a China-based compressor supplier located in Shanghai, with a reported factory area of 3,800+ sqm and 20+ staff. The supplier presents a focused product range covering screw air compressors, variable frequency compressors, dental mini compressors, portable scroll air compressors, and related industrial compressor models, generally with low MOQ requirements of 1 set. Its platform credibility is relatively stronger than its transaction record, supported by 4 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and platform labels including ODM service, finished product inspection, warranty availability, and full customization. However, its recent business performance is limited, with only 4 orders and CN¥6.7K+ transaction value over the past six months, no available store rating, and 0 reviews. Delivery performance is also a notable concern, with an on-time dispatch rate of 66.7%. This supplier may be suitable for small-volume buyers seeking customized compressor sourcing, but larger or time-sensitive procurement programs require caution.

Luoyou Compressor (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Shanghai, China
- Factory area: 3,800+ sqm
- Staff size: 20+ staff
- Verified supplier / factory-audited supplier status: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a defined physical factory presence and a reported production space of more than 3,800 sqm. The staff size of 20+ indicates a relatively small operational team rather than a large-scale manufacturing workforce. The verified supplier status improves confidence that the company has passed some form of platform or supplier verification, but the available data does not provide detailed production capacity, annual output, equipment list, production lines, or factory certification documents.

Scoring Rationale
The company shows basic manufacturing capability and a verifiable operating base, but its small workforce limits evidence of large-scale production strength. The factory area is moderate, yet not enough on its own to classify the supplier as a large-scale stable supply chain. Because no detailed capacity data or formal factory certification beyond verified status is provided, the score is placed in the “small but basic production capability” range.

Final Score
12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier status: True
- Platform / industry labels: ODM service available, Finished product inspection, Warranty available, Full customization

Elaboration
The supplier has a relatively complete platform credibility profile. Four years as a Gold Supplier provides a moderate operating history on the platform, while Trade Assurance gives buyers a platform-backed transaction mechanism. The presence of verification status and multiple capability labels strengthens the supplier’s compliance presentation. However, the data does not include independent international certifications, detailed audit reports, ISO certification, or third-party compliance documentation.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier performs well in platform-based credibility because it combines Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verification, and multiple service and quality-related labels. The 4-year duration is credible but not long enough to be considered a long-established platform record. Since compliance evidence is mainly platform-based and no broader certification data is provided, the score is strong but not at the top tier.

Final Score
17 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 4
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥6.7K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration
Recent transaction activity is low. Four orders over six months and CN¥6.7K+ in transaction value indicate limited commercial validation through the platform. The absence of a store rating and the lack of customer reviews further reduce visibility into buyer satisfaction, repeat purchasing, and market acceptance. Although the supplier lists multiple compressor products, the provided performance data does not demonstrate strong sales momentum.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has some transaction record, so it is not completely unverified commercially. However, the order count and transaction value are both low, and the absence of rating and reviews creates a significant evidence gap. This makes it difficult to confirm stable demand, customer satisfaction, or proven export execution through the platform.

Final Score
8 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Full customization: Available
- ODM service: Available

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within two hours suggests acceptable communication efficiency for procurement inquiries. The availability of full customization and ODM service indicates that the supplier may support customized product requirements rather than only standard catalog sales. However, the data does not include response rate percentage, engineering support details, sample development timelines, or dedicated account service information.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates solid service capability through a relatively fast response time and stated customization support. However, the response time is not within the highest benchmark of ≤1 hour, and the customization capability is only confirmed through platform labels without further operational detail. Therefore, the score is good but not maximum.

Final Score
8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time dispatch rate: 66.7%

Elaboration
The reported on-time dispatch rate is below 70%, which is a weak delivery indicator. For compressor procurement, especially industrial equipment orders, delivery reliability is important because delays can affect installation schedules, maintenance planning, or project timelines. The current figure suggests that buyers should pay close attention to confirmed lead times, production schedules, and shipment commitments before placing orders.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring framework, an on-time dispatch rate below 70% should receive less than 5 points. Since the supplier’s rate is 66.7%, delivery performance is a clear risk area. The score reflects the need for stronger delivery control and buyer-side order monitoring.

Final Score
4 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Finished product inspection: Available
- Verified supplier status: True
- Warranty available: Yes

Elaboration
The supplier has several quality-related platform indicators, including finished product inspection, warranty availability, and verified supplier status. These suggest that some quality assurance mechanisms are presented on the platform. However, customer-side evidence is missing: there is no store rating and no review history. As a result, it is not possible to assess actual buyer satisfaction, product consistency, after-sales handling, or long-term quality performance based on customer feedback.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier receives credit for having finished product inspection and warranty-related labels, as well as verified supplier status. However, quality confidence is weakened by the lack of ratings and reviews. Because the customer feedback side is essentially unproven, the score remains in the lower-middle range despite the presence of basic quality assurance indicators.

Final Score
11 / 20

Total Score

60 / 100

Score Breakdown:
- Company Strength: 12 / 20
- Platform & Compliance Credibility: 17 / 20
- Business Performance: 8 / 20
- Service Capability: 8 / 10
- Delivery Performance: 4 / 10
- Quality & Customer Feedback: 11 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for small-volume or trial-based procurement, especially for buyers seeking compressor products with low MOQ, customization, ODM support, Trade Assurance, and platform-verified supplier status.

This supplier is more suitable for: - Small and medium buyers requiring 1-set MOQ flexibility - Buyers sourcing customized or ODM compressor solutions - Buyers willing to start with sample orders or low-risk trial orders - Procurement teams that can actively manage delivery timelines and order follow-up

Main risk points: - Low recent transaction volume: 4 orders and CN¥6.7K+ in six months - No customer reviews and no available store rating - Weak delivery performance with 66.7% on-time dispatch rate - Limited company scale based on 20+ staff - Insufficient data on production capacity, certifications, equipment, and historical customer satisfaction

Growth potential exists because the supplier has platform credibility, Trade Assurance, verified status, finished product inspection, warranty availability, ODM service, and full customization. However, before larger orders, buyers should request detailed production capacity evidence, delivery schedule confirmation, inspection procedures, warranty terms, and preferably conduct a sample order or third-party inspection.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Ziqi Compressor (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ziqi Compressor (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Apcom Compressor Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Apcom Compressor Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Youli Compressor Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Youli Compressor Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanwei Compressor (Wuhu) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanwei Compressor (Wuhu) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Airhorse Compressor Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Airhorse Compressor Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fu Jih Compressor Industries Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fu Jih Compressor Industries Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Nanxiang Air Compressor Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Nanxiang Air Compressor Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan City Jiubei Compressor Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan City Jiubei Compressor Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Huitong Xinda Air Compressor Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Huitong Xinda Air Compressor Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai M&G Stationery Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai M&G Stationery Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Pdyear Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Pdyear Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sinowell (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sinowell (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Langjue Mould Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Langjue Mould Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Kmcable Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Kmcable Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yonghengsheng Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yonghengsheng Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongyu Industrial (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongyu Industrial (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Rofee Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Rofee Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Xinding Coatings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Xinding Coatings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Gongtao Ceramics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Gongtao Ceramics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County A.S.O Metal Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County A.S.O Metal Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shandong Hanbang Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Hanbang Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Rippa Machinery Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Rippa Machinery Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guli Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guli Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Tongcai New Energy Machinery  Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Tongcai New Energy Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen New Star Glass & Packing Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen New Star Glass & Packing Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing Tianyun Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing Tianyun Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Hengxing Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Hengxing Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Kebang Electric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Kebang Electric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Glory Chemical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Glory Chemical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Xuanyu Bathroom Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Xuanyu Bathroom Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Scs Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Scs Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jinlong Lutai International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jinlong Lutai International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Borui Food Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Borui Food Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Gaussian Strong Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Gaussian Strong Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Jili Special Rope Belt Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Jili Special Rope Belt Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangxi Aigui Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangxi Aigui Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Getech Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Getech Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Honglu Metal Wire Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Honglu Metal Wire Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing City Kahn Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing City Kahn Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Tianyi Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Tianyi Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026