Quanwei Compressor (Wuhu) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Quanwei Compressor (Wuhu) Co., Ltd. is a China-based air compressor supplier located in Anhui, with a reported factory area of 5,800+ m² and 40+ staff. The company offers multiple industrial air compressor products, including VSD double screw type air compressors, oil-free air compressors, rotary double screw air compressors, and related electric compressor models, with low MOQ of 1 set across the listed products. From a procurement perspective, the supplier shows basic-to-moderate manufacturing capacity, verified supplier status, Gold Supplier membership for 2 years, Trade Assurance support, finished product inspection, warranty availability, response time within 1 hour, and 100.0% on-time delivery. However, commercial validation remains limited, with only 2 orders and CN¥60.8K+ transaction value in the past six months, no available store rating, and 0 reviews. This supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking small-batch sourcing, sample orders, or early-stage supplier qualification rather than high-volume procurement without further verification.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 5,800+ m²
- Staff size: 40+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory location: Anhui, China
- Product scope includes multiple air compressor models
- Factory audit or detailed production capacity data: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
Quanwei Compressor has a moderate physical operating scale based on the reported 5,800+ m² factory area and 40+ staff. This suggests the company has a defined production base rather than operating only as a trading entity. The listed product range focuses on air compressor equipment, including screw-type, oil-free, rotary, and industrial models, which indicates specialization within one industrial equipment category.

However, the available data does not include annual output, production lines, machinery details, R&D team size, export volume, or factory audit report details. While the supplier is marked as verified, the depth of verification is not fully shown in the provided data.

Scoring Rationale
The company appears to have basic-to-medium manufacturing capability, supported by factory area, staff size, and verified supplier status. The scale is not large enough, based on the available data, to classify it as a large-scale stable supply chain. At the same time, it is stronger than a small or unclear supplier because it has a stated factory footprint and workforce. The lack of detailed production capacity information prevents a higher score.

Final Score: 15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / platform tags: Warranty available, Finished product inspection, Response time ≤1h, On-time delivery 100.0%
- External certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has several platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These are important platform-level trust signals for international buyers using as a sourcing channel. The Gold Supplier duration of 2 years provides some operating history on the platform, but it is still relatively short compared with suppliers with long-term platform records.

The supplier also carries several useful platform tags, including warranty availability and finished product inspection. However, no independent management system certification, product certification, export compliance certification, or third-party audit certificate is provided in the data.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has the core credibility elements: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification. This supports a positive platform credibility assessment. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 2 years, and there is insufficient data on external compliance certifications or detailed audit documentation. Therefore, the supplier fits the category of having core platform certifications but a relatively short track record.

Final Score: 16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 2
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥60.8K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded recent platform transactions, but the business volume is limited. Two orders over the past six months and CN¥60.8K+ in transaction value show that the supplier has completed some commercial activity, but the volume is not enough to demonstrate strong market acceptance or stable high-frequency purchasing demand.

The absence of a store rating and the presence of 0 reviews create a clear limitation in commercial validation. For procurement teams, buyer feedback and review volume are important references for evaluating consistency, service reliability, and product satisfaction. In this case, the lack of customer feedback reduces confidence in repeat performance.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has some transaction history, so it should not be considered commercially inactive. However, the order count is low, transaction value is modest, and there are no reviews or visible store rating data. This places the supplier below the level of stable medium-scale business performance and closer to a low-transaction supplier with limited market proof.

Final Score: 11 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤1h
- Platform tag: Response time ≤1h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
- Customization capability details: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates strong response speed based on the provided response time of within 1 hour. Fast communication is valuable during quotation, technical clarification, sample confirmation, and after-sales coordination, especially for industrial equipment where buyers may need detailed specification matching.

However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM, ODM, private labeling, engineering modification, or project-based technical customization. Therefore, the service capability assessment can only give credit for response speed, not for advanced customization capability.

Scoring Rationale
The response time meets the top-level service requirement of ≤1 hour. This is a strong positive factor. Nevertheless, because full customization or technical customization capability is not provided, the supplier cannot receive a top score. The service profile is strong in communication responsiveness but incomplete in customization evidence.

Final Score: 8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
- Platform tag: On-time delivery 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. For industrial compressor procurement, delivery reliability is important because delays may affect installation schedules, production planning, or project timelines.

However, the provided data does not include the total number of shipments behind this on-time delivery rate. Since the business performance data shows only 2 orders in the past six months, the delivery performance appears positive but may be based on a limited transaction sample.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9 to 10 points. The supplier’s reported 100.0% rate supports a high score. A perfect score is not assigned because the available order volume is low, which limits the statistical strength of the delivery record.

Final Score: 9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Finished product inspection: Present
- Verified supplier: True
- Warranty available: Present
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Factory verification: Verified supplier marked as True
- Product certifications or quality management certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has several quality-related platform indicators, including finished product inspection, warranty availability, and verified supplier status. These signals suggest that the supplier has at least basic quality assurance mechanisms visible on the platform.

However, the customer feedback side is weak. There is no available store rating and the review count is 0. This means there is insufficient buyer-side evidence to evaluate actual product quality, after-sales experience, consistency, or dispute handling. In addition, no detailed factory inspection report, product testing certificate, ISO certification, CE certification, or other formal quality documentation is included in the provided data.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier deserves credit for finished product inspection, warranty availability, and verified supplier status. These are meaningful quality assurance indicators. However, the lack of reviews, missing store rating, and insufficient certification data prevent a stronger quality score. The score reflects a supplier with basic quality controls but limited customer-validated quality evidence.

Final Score: 13 / 20

Total Score

Total Score: 72 / 100

Score breakdown:
- Company Strength: 15 / 20
- Platform & Compliance Credibility: 16 / 20
- Business Performance: 11 / 20
- Service Capability: 8 / 10
- Delivery Performance: 9 / 10
- Quality & Customer Feedback: 13 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Quanwei Compressor (Wuhu) Co., Ltd. is conditionally recommended for cooperation, especially for small-batch procurement, sample orders, price benchmarking, and early-stage supplier development in the air compressor category. The supplier has moderate factory scale, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, fast response time, finished product inspection, warranty availability, and strong reported delivery performance.

The main risks are limited business validation, only 2 orders in the past six months, CN¥60.8K+ transaction value, 0 reviews, and no available store rating. There is also insufficient data on external certifications, detailed production capacity, full customization capability, and formal quality management systems.

For buyers, this supplier is more suitable for cautious trial cooperation rather than immediate large-volume procurement. Recommended next steps include requesting factory audit documents, product test reports, warranty terms, production capacity details, and references from completed orders before scaling purchase volume. Its growth potential is moderate if it can increase transaction history, collect customer reviews, and provide stronger quality and compliance documentation.