Ziqi Compressor (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Ziqi Compressor (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shanghai, with a reported factory area of over 16,000㎡ and more than 60 staff. The company offers screw compressor-related products, including portable diesel screw compressors, stationary screw compressors, mobile diesel air compressors, and air-end screw compressor products, with low MOQ levels of 1 set across the listed items. The supplier shows strong platform credibility through 16 years as an Gold Supplier and Trade Assurance support. However, commercial performance is mixed: the supplier recorded CN¥1.6M+ transaction value in the past six months, but only 7 orders and 1 customer review. The most significant concern is delivery reliability, with an on-time delivery rate of only 50.0%. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking compressor equipment from an established platform supplier, especially where order value is relatively high and MOQ flexibility is important. However, buyers should carefully manage delivery risk before placing time-sensitive orders.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company name: Ziqi Compressor (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
• Location: Shanghai, China
• Factory area: 16,000+㎡
• Staff size: 60+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Product range provided includes multiple screw compressor-related products.

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported factory area of over 16,000㎡, which indicates a meaningful physical production or operational footprint. The staff size of 60+ suggests the company is not a very small workshop, but it is also not presented as a large-scale industrial group based on the available data. The presence of a verified supplier status strengthens its company profile because it indicates some level of platform or supplier verification.

The listed products are concentrated in screw compressor categories, including portable diesel compressors, stationary screw compressors, mobile diesel air compressors, and air-end screw compressor products. This shows a focused product direction rather than a scattered product portfolio. However, the available data does not provide annual production capacity, number of production lines, machinery list, export markets, R&D team size, or detailed factory certification information.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates medium-level operational strength. A 16,000+㎡ facility and 60+ employees support the view that the supplier has basic to moderate production capacity. The verified supplier status adds credibility to its factory background. However, because the data does not disclose production volume, production line details, equipment capacity, or formal factory certifications beyond the verification status, it cannot be rated as a large-scale stable supply chain provider. The supplier fits better into the “medium stable factory” category rather than the top-tier large-scale category.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 16 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Certification / platform tags:
• Response time ≤3h
• On-time delivery 50.0%
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform history, with 16 years as an Gold Supplier. This is a significant credibility factor because long-term platform participation typically indicates continuity and operational stability on the platform. Trade Assurance support is also important for procurement risk control, as it provides buyers with a platform-backed transaction mechanism.

The supplier also has visible platform tags, including response time and on-time delivery information. However, the available certification/tag data is limited. There is no provided evidence of additional product certifications, management system certifications, third-party inspection certificates, or industry-specific compliance documents. Therefore, while the supplier is credible from a platform-standing perspective, its compliance documentation is not fully demonstrated in the provided data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier scores strongly in this dimension due to its 16-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These are meaningful platform credibility indicators. However, the score is not placed at the absolute maximum because the data does not show a complete certification system or detailed compliance documentation. The certification/industry tag section mainly lists response time and delivery performance rather than formal compliance certificates.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 7
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥1.6M+
• Store rating: 5.0
• Number of reviews: 1

Elaboration

The supplier shows a relatively high transaction value of CN¥1.6M+ over the past six months, especially considering that only 7 orders were recorded. This suggests that the orders may involve relatively high-value equipment purchases, which is consistent with the listed compressor product price ranges. The MOQ of 1 set may also support project-based or equipment-based procurement behavior.

However, the number of orders is low, and the number of customer reviews is extremely limited at only 1 review. Although the store rating is 5.0, the credibility of that rating is constrained by the very small review base. Therefore, the business performance data shows some commercial validation through transaction value, but the order volume and feedback sample are not sufficient to confirm broad market acceptance.

Scoring Rationale

The CN¥1.6M+ transaction value is a positive indicator and prevents the score from falling into a weak-performance category. However, only 7 orders in six months indicates limited transaction frequency. The 5.0 rating is favorable, but with only 1 review, it does not provide a strong or statistically reliable customer feedback base. Overall, business performance appears moderate but not highly validated by order volume or review depth.

Final Score

14 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤3h
• Platform tag: Response time ≤3h
• Full Customization support: Insufficient Data
• Other customization capability: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of ≤3h indicates acceptable communication efficiency. This is useful for buyers requiring quotation clarification, product specification discussion, or transaction coordination. However, the response time does not reach the strongest level of ≤1 hour, which would indicate faster service capability under the provided scoring framework.

There is no provided information confirming Full Customization capability, OEM/ODM support, engineering customization, sample development, technical drawing support, or after-sales service structure. As compressor equipment often requires technical parameter matching, the lack of customization and technical service data limits the ability to fully assess the supplier’s service strength.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves a mid-level service score because its response time is clearly stated and acceptable at ≤3h. However, the absence of Full Customization data prevents a higher rating. Under the scoring criteria, the strongest service score requires response within one hour and strong customization capability, neither of which is confirmed by the provided data. Therefore, the score reflects normal communication responsiveness but incomplete evidence of advanced service capability.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 50.0%

Elaboration

Delivery performance is the weakest area in the provided supplier data. An on-time delivery rate of 50.0% means only half of recorded deliveries were shipped on time according to the available platform metric. For equipment procurement, especially compressors that may be linked to production line installation, construction projects, or replacement schedules, delivery reliability is a critical purchasing factor.

The data does not provide explanations for the low on-time delivery rate, such as order complexity, production lead time, logistics constraints, or sample size. Therefore, the assessment must be based strictly on the disclosed figure. Regardless of the cause, the current delivery metric indicates a meaningful risk for buyers with fixed delivery deadlines.

Scoring Rationale

According to the required scoring standard, delivery performance below 70% should receive below 5 points. With an on-time delivery rate of 50.0%, the supplier’s delivery reliability is significantly below the acceptable benchmark. The score reflects a clear procurement risk, especially for buyers requiring predictable shipment schedules.

Final Score

3 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 5.0
• Number of reviews: 1
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided as True
• Product certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a perfect store rating of 5.0, but this is based on only 1 review. While the rating itself is positive, the very small number of reviews limits its reliability as a customer satisfaction indicator. A larger review base would be needed to confirm consistent product quality and service performance.

The verified supplier status is a positive quality-related signal because it indicates that some level of supplier verification exists. However, there is no provided information confirming Finished Product Inspection, quality control procedures, inspection reports, defect rates, warranty terms, product certifications, or third-party testing documentation. Since compressor equipment is technical and performance-sensitive, the absence of detailed quality assurance data is a limitation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier receives a moderate score in this dimension. The 5.0 rating and verified supplier status are positive, but the assessment is constrained by only 1 customer review and insufficient data on finished product inspection or formal quality systems. The supplier cannot be scored in the high range because there is not enough evidence of a mature quality assurance framework or a broad customer feedback record.

Final Score

12 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation is recommended.

Ziqi Compressor (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. shows solid platform credibility, with 16 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and a meaningful factory footprint of 16,000+㎡. The supplier appears suitable for buyers sourcing screw compressor-related equipment with low MOQ requirements, especially project-based buyers, small-to-medium industrial buyers, or purchasers needing single-set orders.

However, the main procurement risk is delivery reliability. The disclosed on-time delivery rate is only 50.0%, which is significantly below a stable procurement benchmark. Buyers with urgent delivery schedules, strict project timelines, or penalty-linked delivery requirements should be cautious.

Before placing larger or time-sensitive orders, buyers should request written confirmation of lead time, production schedule, shipment plan, quality inspection process, and after-sales terms. The supplier has growth potential due to its long platform history and transaction value, but stronger delivery performance and more transparent quality assurance data would be needed for higher procurement confidence.