Shaoxing City Kahn Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shaoxing City Kahn Trade Co., Ltd. is a China-based textile supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of 1,400+㎡ and 60+ staff. The company presents a focused fabric product portfolio covering cotton twill, linen fabric, silk fabric, printed floral fabric, and other colorful textile materials, with low minimum order quantities such as 1 meter, 2 meters, or 1 yard depending on the product. Its strongest advantages are platform credibility and transactional validation: it has 13 years as an Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, and is marked as a verified supplier. Business performance is also solid, with 800+ orders and CN¥4.5M+ transaction value in the past six months. However, the factory size is relatively modest, and available customer feedback volume is limited at 40+ reviews. This supplier is suitable for small to medium buyers, fabric wholesalers, sample-driven sourcing teams, and brands requiring flexible MOQ and customization support.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company name: Shaoxing City Kahn Trade Co., Ltd.
• Country: China
• Province: Zhejiang
• Factory area: 1,400+㎡
• Employees: 60+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a disclosed operating base with a factory area of over 1,400 square meters and more than 60 employees. This indicates an established production or supply operation rather than a purely virtual trading profile. The verified supplier status provides an additional layer of credibility regarding the existence and basic operational profile of the company.

However, based strictly on the provided data, the company does not appear to be a large-scale manufacturing operation. A 1,400+㎡ facility and 60+ staff suggest small-to-mid-sized capacity. There is no additional information about production lines, monthly output, machinery, annual capacity, export volume, or formal factory management certifications beyond the verified supplier indicator.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic and credible operational capacity, supported by disclosed factory area, staff size, and verified supplier status. Its scale appears sufficient for flexible textile supply and small-to-medium volume procurement, but the available data does not support classification as a large-scale stable supply chain. The absence of detailed production capacity, equipment data, or formal factory certification information limits the score.

Final Score

14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 13 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / industry tags:
• Warranty available
• Finished product inspection
• Full customization
• ODM service available

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. A 13-year Gold Supplier history indicates a long-term presence on , which is a meaningful signal for platform continuity. Trade Assurance support provides a transaction protection mechanism for buyers, while the verified supplier status further strengthens confidence in the supplier’s platform profile.

The listed tags also show a relatively complete commercial service framework, including warranty availability, finished product inspection, full customization, and ODM service availability. These tags are relevant to textile procurement, especially for buyers needing customized fabrics or product development support.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets the core requirements for a high platform credibility score: long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, supplier verification, and multiple relevant service and quality-related tags. The 13-year platform history is especially positive. The score is not a full 20 because the provided data does not include details of third-party audit reports, internationally recognized factory certifications, or specific compliance certificates.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 800+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥4.5M+
• Store rating: 4.5
• Number of reviews: 40+

Elaboration

The supplier shows strong recent commercial activity, with more than 800 orders and over CN¥4.5 million in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates that the supplier has meaningful buyer engagement and active order conversion on the platform.

The store rating of 4.5 is positive, though not at the very highest level. The number of reviews, 40+, provides some customer feedback reference, but the review base is still moderate compared with suppliers that have hundreds or thousands of reviews. Therefore, the transaction data is stronger than the feedback volume.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s recent order count and transaction value support a strong business performance rating. More than 800 orders and CN¥4.5M+ in six months suggest active market acceptance and commercial reliability. However, the 4.5 store rating and 40+ reviews prevent the supplier from reaching the maximum range, as customer feedback depth is not extensive.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤5h
• Full customization: Available
• ODM service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier reports a communication response time of no more than 5 hours, which is acceptable for cross-border sourcing but not in the fastest response category. The availability of full customization and ODM service indicates that the supplier can support more than standard product transactions and may be able to assist buyers with customized fabric requirements.

The product data also shows low minimum order quantities, such as 1 meter, 2 meters, and 1 yard, which may support sample-stage procurement and flexible sourcing. However, detailed information about design support, sampling lead time, technical team structure, or dedicated account management is not provided.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has clear customization-related service capability and a reasonable response time. However, because the response time is ≤5h rather than ≤1h, it does not qualify for the highest service score range. The customization and ODM tags strengthen the evaluation, but the lack of deeper service process data keeps the score within the upper-middle range.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time dispatch rate: 98.6%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time dispatch rate is 98.6%, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipping rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range.

A 98.6% rate suggests that the supplier has effective order processing and dispatch management based on available platform data. However, no further details are provided regarding average lead time, urgent order handling, logistics partners, international shipping performance, or delay dispute history.

Scoring Rationale

The on-time dispatch rate is clearly above the 90% benchmark and is close to full compliance performance. Based strictly on the provided data, delivery reliability is one of the supplier’s strongest measurable areas. The score is high because the metric directly supports strong delivery execution.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.5
• Reviews: 40+
• Finished product inspection: Available
• Verified supplier: True
• Warranty available: Yes

Elaboration

The supplier has several quality assurance indicators, including finished product inspection, warranty availability, and verified supplier status. These are positive signs for buyers concerned about product consistency and post-sale handling.

The store rating of 4.5 is generally favorable, suggesting acceptable customer satisfaction. However, the number of reviews is only 40+, which provides limited statistical depth. While the supplier has strong transaction activity, the customer review base is not large enough to fully validate long-term quality consistency across many buyers.

No detailed quality certifications, inspection standards, defect rates, test reports, fabric composition verification procedures, or third-party quality audit documents are provided. Therefore, while the available quality signals are positive, the assessment must remain conservative.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves a solid score because it has finished product inspection, warranty availability, verified supplier status, and a positive store rating. However, the review count is moderate, and there is insufficient data on formal quality certifications or detailed inspection protocols. This supports a good but not top-tier quality evaluation.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, especially for small-to-medium textile procurement projects.

Shaoxing City Kahn Trade Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking fabric products with flexible MOQ, active platform transaction history, customization support, and reliable dispatch performance. The supplier is particularly appropriate for sample orders, fabric wholesalers, boutique apparel brands, product development teams, and buyers requiring ODM or full customization services.

Main strengths include: - 13 years as an Gold Supplier
- Trade Assurance support
- Verified supplier status
- 800+ orders and CN¥4.5M+ transaction value in the past six months
- 98.6% on-time dispatch rate
- Finished product inspection and warranty availability
- Low MOQ options across listed products

Main risks include: - Factory scale is modest at 1,400+㎡ and 60+ staff
- Review volume is limited at 40+ reviews
- Store rating is good but not exceptional at 4.5
- Insufficient Data on production capacity, machinery, formal factory certifications, quality testing standards, and export market experience

Growth potential:
The supplier shows strong platform maturity and recent commercial activity. If it can provide more detailed quality documentation, factory audit reports, production capacity data, and larger customer feedback records, it could become more suitable for higher-volume or more compliance-sensitive procurement programs.