Qingdao Datao Fishing Tackle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Qingdao Datao Fishing Tackle Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shandong, positioned in the fishing tackle and aquaculture product segment, with listed products including fishing bait cage traps, plastic fish trap nets, bait cage seals, PE aquaculture products, and commercial plastic fishing traps. Based on the provided data, the company shows a stable mid-sized manufacturing profile, supported by a 7,000+㎡ factory area, 100+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is strong, with 16 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and platform tags including Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, Low MOQ for customization, and Full Customization. Business performance is moderate to solid, with 60+ orders and CN¥1M+ transaction value in the past six months, though the review count remains limited at 10. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking factory-direct fishing and aquaculture products with customization options, moderate order flexibility, and platform-backed transaction protection.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Company name: Qingdao Datao Fishing Tackle Co., Ltd.
- Country: China
- Province: Shandong
- Factory area: 7,000+㎡
- Employees: 100+ staff
- Verified supplier / factory-audited supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates a measurable manufacturing base with a factory area exceeding 7,000㎡ and more than 100 employees. This indicates that the company is not a small trading-only operation based on the available data, but rather has a defined production footprint and workforce scale. The verified supplier status further supports its operational credibility from a procurement screening perspective.
However, the data does not provide further details on production lines, monthly output, machinery count, capacity utilization, or specific factory audit reports. Therefore, while the company appears to have a stable manufacturing foundation, its full production scalability cannot be completely verified from the available information.
Scoring Rationale
The combination of 7,000+㎡ factory size, 100+ employees, and verified supplier status supports a score in the medium stable factory range. The supplier shows stronger capability than a small basic manufacturer, but the absence of detailed production capacity, equipment data, and formal factory certification information prevents it from being assessed as a large-scale, fully validated supply chain operation.
Final Score
16 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 16 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags:
- Finished Product Inspection
- Low MOQ for customization
- ODM service available
- Full customization
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. A 16-year Gold Supplier history indicates long-term platform presence, which is an important trust signal in -based sourcing. Trade Assurance support provides an additional transactional protection mechanism for buyers. The supplier also has several platform capability tags, including inspection, ODM, and customization-related labels.
The data shows a complete and relatively mature platform credibility structure. However, no third-party management system certifications, such as ISO certification, product compliance certificates, or export-market-specific certifications, are provided. These should be treated as Insufficient Data, not assumed.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier performs strongly in this category due to long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance availability, verified supplier status, and multiple platform-backed capability labels. The score is high because the platform credibility elements are largely complete. A perfect score is not assigned because no formal external compliance certifications or detailed audit documentation are included in the provided data.
Final Score
19 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in the past six months: 60+
- Transaction value in the past six months: CN¥1M+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 10
Elaboration
The supplier has recorded more than 60 orders and over CN¥1M in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates active commercial performance and a certain level of market validation. The 5.0 store rating is positive and suggests satisfactory buyer experience among the reviewed transactions.
However, the review count is only 10, which limits the statistical strength of the feedback base. While the transaction amount and order count show business activity, the relatively small number of reviews means buyer satisfaction evidence is not yet broad enough to classify the supplier as a top-tier, heavily validated marketplace performer.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows stable medium-level business performance: order volume and transaction value are meaningful, and the store rating is excellent. The main limiting factor is the low review count, which reduces confidence in the depth of customer feedback. Therefore, the supplier is scored in the stable medium transaction range rather than the highest performance bracket.
Final Score
16 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Full Customization: Available
- Low MOQ for customization: Available
- ODM service: Available
Elaboration
The supplier shows good service capability through a response time of no more than three hours, which is acceptable for international sourcing communication. The presence of Full Customization, Low MOQ for customization, and ODM service indicates that the supplier can support customized procurement requirements rather than only standard product supply.
The available data does not specify multilingual support, dedicated account management, sample lead time, engineering design support, or after-sales service procedures. These areas are therefore considered Insufficient Data.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has stronger-than-basic customization capability due to Full Customization and ODM service availability. However, the response time is ≤3h rather than ≤1h, so it does not meet the top scoring condition for fastest communication performance. The supplier is therefore positioned in the upper range of normal-to-good service capability.
Final Score
8 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time dispatch rate: 89.2%
Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate is 89.2%, which places it just below the 90% threshold for the highest delivery performance tier. This indicates generally reliable fulfillment, though not yet at the strongest level. For buyers with strict delivery windows or seasonal demand cycles, this metric should be monitored closely before scaling order volume.
No data is provided regarding average lead time, production lead time, logistics partners, shipping regions, urgent order handling, or historical delay causes. These are considered Insufficient Data.
Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring framework, an on-time dispatch rate between 80% and 89% falls into the 7–8 point range. Since the supplier’s rate is 89.2%, it is at the upper end of this band and close to the next tier, justifying the maximum score within the 80–89% category.
Final Score
8 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 10
- Finished Product Inspection: Available
- Verified supplier / factory-audited supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier has a perfect store rating of 5.0, which is a positive signal for customer satisfaction. The Finished Product Inspection tag indicates that some form of final inspection process is available, supporting quality control before shipment. The verified supplier status also strengthens confidence in the supplier’s operational authenticity.
However, only 10 reviews are available, which limits the reliability of the feedback sample. The data also does not include defect rates, inspection standards, quality control team size, testing equipment, product compliance certificates, or historical claim records. These areas remain Insufficient Data and should be verified before high-volume procurement.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier deserves a good score because it combines a 5.0 store rating, Finished Product Inspection, and verified supplier status. The reason it does not reach the highest 18–20 range is the limited review count and lack of detailed quality system documentation. The quality profile is positive but not yet supported by extensive customer feedback or deeper technical quality data.
Final Score
17 / 20
Total Score
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Company Strength | 16 / 20 |
| Platform & Compliance Credibility | 19 / 20 |
| Business Performance | 16 / 20 |
| Service Capability | 8 / 10 |
| Delivery Performance | 8 / 10 |
| Quality & Customer Feedback | 17 / 20 |
| Total Score | 84 / 100 |
Procurement Recommendation
Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.
Qingdao Datao Fishing Tackle Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers sourcing fishing traps, bait cages, aquaculture-related plastic products, and similar fishing tackle items. The supplier is especially relevant for customers seeking factory-direct supply, moderate MOQ options, ODM service, and customization support through an -backed transaction structure.
Suitable customer types include:
- Small to medium importers seeking fishing and aquaculture products
- Buyers requiring customized product specifications or ODM support
- Procurement teams preferring suppliers with long platform history
- Customers who value Trade Assurance and finished product inspection support
Main risks:
- Review count is limited to 10, reducing the statistical reliability of customer feedback.
- On-time dispatch rate is 89.2%, close to but below the 90% high-performance threshold.
- No detailed data is provided on production capacity, certifications, quality testing procedures, or export compliance documents.
- Formal product certifications and market-specific compliance information are Insufficient Data.
Growth potential: The supplier has strong platform credibility, long-term presence, verified supplier status, customization capability, and active recent transaction performance. If it improves delivery consistency above 90%, expands verified customer feedback, and provides more detailed quality and compliance documentation, it could become a stronger candidate for larger-scale procurement programs.
Leave your comment