Quanzhou Taihui Shoe Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Quanzhou Taihui Shoe Industry Co., Ltd. is a Fujian, China-based footwear supplier specializing in casual shoes, sneakers, high-top shoes, ankle shoes, and custom-logo casual footwear. Based on the provided data, the company operates a factory area of over 2,300㎡ with more than 60 staff and is marked as a verified supplier, indicating a basic-to-medium manufacturing foundation suitable for small to mid-sized footwear procurement programs. The supplier has strong platform credibility, including 7 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and platform labels such as low MOQ for customization, response time within 2 hours, and 90.6% on-time delivery. Its recent business performance is relatively solid, with 300+ orders and CN¥2.3M+ transaction value in the past six months, supported by a 4.6 store rating and 80+ reviews. This supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking flexible MOQ footwear sourcing, custom-logo sneaker projects, and moderate-volume procurement with platform-backed transaction protection.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Factory location: Fujian, China
• Factory area: 2,300+㎡
• Employees: 60+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Product scope includes casual shoes, sneakers, high-top shoes, ankle shoes, and custom-logo footwear.

Elaboration

The company has a clearly stated physical factory scale and workforce size. A factory area of over 2,300㎡ and more than 60 staff suggest that the supplier has established production capacity, but the scale does not indicate a large industrial manufacturing base. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the existence and basic operating capability of the factory. Product listings show multiple casual footwear categories and MOQ flexibility ranging from 1 pair to 200 pairs, which indicates the supplier may support both sample-level purchases and batch procurement.

However, the available data does not provide detailed information on monthly production capacity, production lines, machinery, annual output, internal quality control team size, or factory audit reports beyond the verified supplier marker. Therefore, the company can be assessed as a small-to-medium stable footwear supplier rather than a large-scale supply chain manufacturer.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates a tangible operating base with 2,300+㎡ factory space, 60+ staff, and verified supplier status. This supports a stable basic manufacturing profile. However, the scale is moderate, and there is insufficient data on production volume, advanced factory certifications, or large-scale manufacturing infrastructure. Therefore, it fits best within the “medium stable factory” range rather than the top-tier large-scale supply chain category.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Platform/industry labels:
• Low MOQ for customization
• Response time ≤2h
• On-time delivery 90.6%

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. A 7-year Gold Supplier history reflects a relatively long presence on , which is an important credibility indicator for platform-based sourcing. Trade Assurance availability provides additional transactional protection for buyers, especially in payment, order fulfillment, and dispute handling contexts within the platform mechanism.

The supplier also carries relevant platform labels, including low MOQ for customization, response time within 2 hours, and on-time delivery of 90.6%. These labels strengthen the supplier’s operational transparency on . The verified supplier status further supports its credibility. However, the provided data does not include details on third-party factory audit reports, ISO certifications, social compliance certifications, product safety certifications, or industry-specific footwear compliance certificates. Therefore, while platform credibility is strong, broader compliance documentation remains insufficient.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has several core credibility factors: 7 years Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and multiple platform performance labels. This represents a complete and mature credibility structure. The only limitation is that no additional factory or product compliance certifications are provided beyond platform-level verification and labels.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 300+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥2.3M+
• Store rating: 4.6
• Reviews: 80+

Elaboration

The supplier shows solid recent commercial activity. More than 300 orders in six months indicates consistent buyer engagement, and CN¥2.3M+ in transaction value demonstrates meaningful trading volume. The 4.6 store rating is positive and suggests generally acceptable buyer satisfaction, while 80+ reviews provide a moderate base of customer feedback.

The data indicates that the supplier has already been commercially validated to some extent through actual platform transactions. However, the rating is good rather than outstanding, and the review count, while useful, is not extremely large. There is also no data on repeat purchase rate, buyer geography, major customer types, cancellation rate, refund rate, or category-level sales breakdown. Therefore, the business performance can be considered stable and commercially proven, but not at the highest possible level.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s 300+ recent orders and CN¥2.3M+ transaction value indicate healthy market activity. The 4.6 rating and 80+ reviews support a positive but not exceptional buyer feedback profile. This places the supplier in the upper-middle range: stronger than low-volume suppliers, but slightly below the highest tier that would require larger review volume, higher ratings, or more extensive performance transparency.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤2h
• Platform label: Low MOQ for customization
• Product listings include custom-logo footwear options.
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates good response efficiency, with a stated communication response time of within 2 hours. This is a positive indicator for procurement communication, quotation follow-up, order clarification, and sampling discussions. The “Low MOQ for customization” platform label and listed custom-logo sneaker products suggest that the supplier can support some level of customization, particularly logo-related or low-MOQ customization services.

However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports full customization, such as custom outsole development, material sourcing, private mold development, packaging design, technical drawings, or full OEM/ODM development. Therefore, customization capability should be understood as supported at a basic or partial level based on the provided evidence, not as comprehensive full customization.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s response time is good but not at the highest benchmark of ≤1 hour. Customization capability is supported by the “Low MOQ for customization” label and custom-logo product listings, but Full Customization is not explicitly confirmed. This supports a service score in the good but not top-tier range.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 90.6%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 90.6% meets the threshold for the highest delivery performance band defined in the scoring framework. This indicates that most orders are shipped according to the expected schedule. For footwear procurement, delivery reliability is important because delays can affect seasonal launches, retail campaigns, and inventory planning.

However, the data does not include additional logistics indicators such as average lead time, sample lead time, production lead time, delay reasons, historical shipment volume by month, or performance during peak seasons. Therefore, the evaluation is based strictly on the provided on-time delivery percentage.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. At 90.6%, the supplier meets this threshold, but only slightly exceeds it. Therefore, a strong but not perfect score is appropriate.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.6
• Reviews: 80+
• Verified supplier: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification report is Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a positive customer feedback profile, with a 4.6 store rating and more than 80 reviews. This suggests that buyers have generally had satisfactory experiences. The verified supplier status provides some platform-level support for supplier legitimacy and basic factory credibility.

However, quality assurance data is limited. The provided information does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, detailed quality control procedures, defect rate, incoming material inspection, in-line inspection, final random inspection, third-party inspection acceptance, or footwear-specific testing standards. In addition, while the supplier is marked as verified, no detailed factory verification report or audit scope is provided. As a result, the quality evaluation must rely mainly on customer rating, review count, and verified supplier status.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows good buyer feedback through a 4.6 rating and 80+ reviews, which supports a positive quality perception. Verified supplier status adds some confidence. However, the absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection and detailed factory quality system information prevents the supplier from reaching the highest quality score range. The score reflects good but not fully documented quality assurance capability.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Quanzhou Taihui Shoe Industry Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking casual shoes, sneakers, high-top shoes, and custom-logo footwear with flexible MOQ requirements. The supplier is particularly appropriate for small to mid-sized importers, e-commerce sellers, startup footwear brands, promotional footwear buyers, and buyers requiring Trade Assurance protection.

The main strengths are its 7-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, 300+ orders and CN¥2.3M+ transaction value in the past six months, 90.6% on-time delivery rate, and relatively responsive communication within 2 hours.

Key risks include insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, detailed factory audit reports, production capacity, quality control procedures, and full customization capability. Before placing larger or long-term orders, buyers should request production photos, sample confirmation, inspection standards, packaging details, and, where necessary, third-party pre-shipment inspection.

Overall, the supplier shows good platform credibility and stable commercial performance, with growth potential in low-MOQ customized footwear and moderate-volume casual shoe sourcing.