Jiangxi Gleibo Shoe Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Jiangxi Gleibo Shoe Industry Co., Ltd. is a China-based footwear supplier located in Jiangxi Province, with a reported factory area of 4,300+ sqm and 50+ staff. The supplier lists multiple women’s casual footwear and slipper-related products with relatively low MOQs ranging from 2 pairs to 200 units/pairs, indicating potential flexibility for small-batch sourcing. Platform credibility is supported by Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification, though the Gold Supplier tenure is only 1 year. Commercial performance remains limited, with 10+ orders and CN¥6.7K+ transaction value over the past six months, while store rating data is unavailable and review count is 0. Service capability appears reasonably strong due to a response time of ≤2h and customization-related tags, including Full Customization and ODM service. Delivery performance is acceptable at 88.9% on-time shipment. Overall, this supplier may be suitable for small to mid-sized buyers seeking flexible footwear sourcing, but quality validation and market feedback remain key risks.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Jiangxi Province, China
- Factory area: 4,300+ sqm
- Employees: 50+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a defined manufacturing base with over 4,300 sqm of factory space and more than 50 staff. This indicates an established production operation rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. However, the available employee and factory size data suggest a relatively small to lower-midscale operation compared with large-scale footwear manufacturers.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates basic production capability and has supplier verification status, which supports a certain level of operational credibility. However, the factory scale and workforce size are not large enough to indicate a high-capacity or deeply mature supply chain. No additional factory audit details, production capacity data, or major factory certifications are provided, which limits the strength assessment.

Final Score
13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier tenure: 1 year
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry tags: Warranty available, Full customization, ODM service available, Minor customization

Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and supplier verification. These elements provide baseline protection and credibility for buyers using the platform. The listed service tags also show that the supplier presents itself as customization-capable.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has core platform trust mechanisms in place, especially Trade Assurance and verified supplier status. However, the Gold Supplier tenure is only 1 year, which means the supplier has a limited platform track record. The certification/tag information mainly relates to service capabilities rather than independent product or factory compliance certifications. Therefore, credibility is solid but not yet highly established.

Final Score
15 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 10+
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥6.7K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded some transaction activity, but the order volume and transaction value are relatively low. The absence of store rating data and the lack of customer reviews reduce the ability to validate buyer satisfaction or repeat purchasing behavior.

Scoring Rationale
While 10+ orders show that the supplier has completed platform transactions, the commercial scale is still limited. CN¥6.7K+ in six-month transaction value does not indicate strong market traction. More importantly, the lack of store rating and 0 reviews create a significant gap in commercial validation. This places the supplier in the lower range of business performance despite some order activity.

Final Score
10 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: Listed
- ODM service available: Listed
- Minor customization: Listed

Elaboration
The supplier shows a relatively responsive communication profile, with a stated response time within 2 hours. The presence of Full Customization, ODM service, and Minor Customization tags suggests that the supplier may support different levels of customization for footwear products.

Scoring Rationale
A response time of ≤2h is commercially acceptable, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1h. The customization-related tags strengthen the supplier’s service profile and make it potentially suitable for buyers requiring product adaptation. However, no detailed customization case studies, development lead times, or sample service data are provided.

Final Score
8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time shipment rate: 88.9%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time shipment rate is close to 90%, which indicates generally stable delivery execution. However, it remains slightly below the 90% threshold that would indicate stronger delivery reliability.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate between 80% and 89% falls into the 7–8 point range. At 88.9%, the supplier is near the upper end of this range. This suggests acceptable delivery performance, but buyers with strict delivery schedules should still monitor order timelines carefully.

Final Score
8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory / supplier verification: Verified supplier is True

Elaboration
The supplier has verified supplier status, which provides some baseline credibility. However, customer-facing quality indicators are weak because there is no available store rating and no customer reviews. There is also no provided data confirming Finished Product Inspection or other quality inspection systems.

Scoring Rationale
Quality confidence is limited due to the absence of reviews, ratings, and Finished Product Inspection information. Verified supplier status helps reduce risk to some extent, but it does not replace buyer feedback or product-level inspection evidence. The lack of customer reviews means there is insufficient market-based validation of product consistency, after-sales handling, or defect performance.

Final Score
9 / 20

Total Score

63 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation may be considered with caution, especially for small to mid-sized buyers seeking flexible footwear sourcing, low MOQ options, and customization support. The supplier appears suitable for trial orders, sample development, or smaller-volume procurement rather than large-scale, high-risk purchasing at the initial stage.

Key strengths include verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, reasonable response time, customization-related service tags, and acceptable on-time shipment performance. The main risks are limited transaction scale, 0 customer reviews, unavailable store rating, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection or formal quality control systems.

Recommended procurement approach: start with samples or a small trial order, use Trade Assurance, define quality specifications clearly, and require pre-shipment inspection before scaling order volume. The supplier has growth potential if it can build stronger transaction history, accumulate buyer reviews, and provide clearer quality assurance documentation.