Cixi Dujia Electronic Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Cixi Dujia Electronic Appliance Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of over 35,000㎡ and more than 70 staff. The company shows strong platform credibility through 22 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and available OEM/ODM and customization labels. Its listed products include ergonomic design plastic/aluminum items and printer stands, with MOQs mainly at 500–1,000 pieces, indicating suitability for bulk procurement rather than very small trial orders. However, recent business performance is weak based on the available data: only 2 orders and CN¥1.3K+ transaction value in the past six months, with no store rating provided and 0 reviews. Delivery performance is strong with a 100.0% on-time shipment rate. Overall, this supplier appears best suited for buyers prioritizing platform credibility, customization options, and delivery reliability, while requiring further validation of actual commercial performance and customer feedback before large-scale cooperation.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory location: Zhejiang, China
- Factory area: 35,000+㎡
- Employees: 70+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier reports a relatively large factory area of more than 35,000㎡, which suggests it has a physical production base of meaningful scale. The employee count of 70+ staff indicates a moderate workforce rather than a very large labor-intensive manufacturer. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the existence and basic operating capacity of the company, although no additional factory audit details or production line data are provided.

Scoring Rationale:
The factory area is strong and supports the view that the supplier has established production infrastructure. However, the staff number is moderate, and there is insufficient data on production capacity, monthly output, machinery, or specific factory certifications. Therefore, the company should be assessed as a stable medium-scale supplier rather than a fully proven large-scale supply chain operator.

Final Score: 16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier years: 22 yrs
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry labels: OEM for well-known brands, ODM service available, Full customization, Minor customization

Elaboration:
The supplier has a long platform history with 22 years as a Gold Supplier, which is a strong indicator of platform continuity. Trade Assurance support provides additional transactional protection for buyers. The presence of verified supplier status and multiple service labels, including OEM, ODM, full customization, and minor customization, strengthens its platform profile.

Scoring Rationale:
This is one of the supplier’s strongest dimensions. A 22-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and verification status form a strong platform credibility base. However, the data does not provide specific third-party factory audit reports, ISO certifications, product compliance certificates, or detailed inspection documentation. For this reason, the score is high but not perfect.

Final Score: 19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in the past 6 months: 2
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥1.3K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration:
The recent transaction data is limited. Only 2 orders and CN¥1.3K+ transaction value over the past six months indicate low visible commercial activity on the platform. The absence of a store rating and the presence of 0 reviews also limit the ability to verify buyer satisfaction or repeat purchasing behavior through platform data.

Scoring Rationale:
Although the supplier has strong platform tenure, its recent commercial validation is weak based on the provided figures. Low order volume, low transaction value, no rating, and no customer reviews make it difficult to confirm current market acceptance. This dimension therefore receives a low score due to insufficient recent performance evidence.

Final Score: 8 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤7h
- Full customization: Available
- Minor customization: Available
- ODM service: Available

Elaboration:
The supplier supports multiple customization-related services, including full customization, minor customization, and ODM service. This indicates flexibility for buyers requiring product adaptation or development support. The response time of ≤7 hours is acceptable, but it does not reach the strongest service benchmark of response within one hour.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates good customization capability, which is valuable for OEM/ODM procurement. However, the response time is not fast enough to qualify as top-tier service performance. There is also insufficient data on sample lead time, engineering support, multilingual communication, or dedicated account management. The service capability is therefore considered solid but not exceptional.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time shipment rate: 100.0%

Elaboration:
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time shipment rate, which is the strongest delivery indicator provided. This suggests that, based on available platform data, the supplier has fulfilled shipments on schedule.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the reported rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the full score in this dimension. However, the interpretation should be balanced with the low recent order count, because the delivery record is based on limited visible transaction volume.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided

Elaboration:
The supplier has verified supplier status, which provides some baseline confidence in company legitimacy and factory-related information. However, no store rating is provided, there are 0 reviews, and there is no data confirming Finished Product Inspection. This creates a significant gap in quality validation from actual customers.

Scoring Rationale:
Quality assurance cannot be strongly confirmed from the available data. Verified supplier status is positive, but the lack of reviews, missing rating, and absence of Finished Product Inspection information prevent a higher score. The supplier may have basic quality credibility through verification, but customer-side quality feedback is insufficient.

Final Score: 10 / 20

Total Score

70 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended. Cixi Dujia Electronic Appliance Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking a long-established supplier with Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, customization options, and strong reported delivery performance. It may be appropriate for bulk buyers with MOQs of 500–1,000 pieces who can conduct their own sample testing and supplier due diligence.

The main risks are weak recent transaction performance, only 2 orders in the past six months, low visible transaction value, 0 reviews, missing store rating, and insufficient quality inspection data. Before placing large orders, buyers should request samples, confirm product specifications, verify inspection procedures, and use Trade Assurance for payment protection. The supplier’s growth potential lies in its strong platform history, factory scale, customization capability, and 100.0% on-time shipment rate, but it needs stronger recent sales records and customer feedback to support higher procurement confidence.