Cixi Baishun Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report: Cixi Baishun Shoes Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Cixi Baishun Shoes Co., Ltd. is a China-based footwear supplier located in Zhejiang Province, with a reported factory area of 2,400+㎡ and 50+ staff. The company appears to be positioned as a small-to-medium-scale supplier focused on slipper and home footwear products, with low MOQ options across several listed products. It holds Gold Supplier status for 2 years, supports Trade Assurance, and is marked as a verified supplier, which provides a basic level of platform credibility. Its recent business performance shows 80+ orders and CN¥135.2K+ transaction value over the past six months, indicating active but not high-volume commercial validation. The store rating is 4.5 with 20+ reviews, suggesting generally positive but still limited customer feedback. The supplier is suitable for small to medium buyers, trial orders, low-MOQ sourcing, and buyers seeking flexible procurement volumes. Key limitations include moderate delivery performance and insufficient data on advanced quality inspection systems.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company name: Cixi Baishun Shoes Co., Ltd.
• Country: China
• Factory location: Zhejiang Province
• Factory area: 2,400+㎡
• Employees: 50+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a defined factory location in Zhejiang Province and reports a factory area of more than 2,400㎡ with over 50 employees. This indicates that the company has a physical production base and a basic workforce capable of handling regular footwear production. The verified supplier status further supports the existence of operational facilities and provides a degree of credibility regarding the company’s physical setup.

However, based on the provided data, the production scale is not large. A factory size of 2,400+㎡ and 50+ staff suggests a small-to-medium manufacturing operation rather than a large-scale industrial supplier. There is no additional information on production lines, monthly capacity, machinery, warehouse size, automation level, or large-scale export capability.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic manufacturing capability with a verified factory profile, which supports confidence in its operational foundation. However, the scale indicators are moderate: 2,400+㎡ and 50+ staff are sufficient for regular small-to-medium order fulfillment but do not indicate a large-scale or deeply integrated supply chain. Because factory verification is present, the supplier scores above the basic level, but the absence of production capacity data prevents a higher score.

Final Score

14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / platform labels:
• Low MOQ for customization
• Response time ≤5h
• On-time delivery 87.5%

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These elements are positive because they provide buyers with platform-level transaction protection and some degree of supplier verification.

The Gold Supplier duration is 2 years, which indicates that the supplier has maintained platform participation for a limited but established period. It is not a long-tenured supplier, so the credibility level is not yet equivalent to suppliers with many years of platform history. The listed platform labels are useful but relatively operational in nature, focusing on MOQ flexibility, response time, and delivery performance rather than broader compliance certifications.

No independent factory certifications, product certifications, quality management certifications, or social compliance certifications are provided in the data. Therefore, compliance credibility is supported primarily by platform mechanisms rather than third-party certification depth.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core trust indicators: Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. These are meaningful for buyer protection and initial supplier screening. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 2 years, and there is insufficient data on external certifications or formal compliance systems. This places the supplier in the “core certifications present but shorter history” category rather than the highest credibility tier.

Final Score

15 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 80+
• Transaction amount in the past 6 months: CN¥135.2K+
• Store rating: 4.5
• Reviews: 20+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded over 80 orders and more than CN¥135.2K in transaction value over the past six months. This shows that the store is commercially active and has achieved measurable transaction volume. The 4.5 store rating is generally positive, indicating that buyers have had an acceptable purchasing experience overall.

However, the order quantity and transaction amount suggest moderate rather than high business performance. The review count of 20+ is useful but still limited, meaning the available customer feedback base is not large enough to fully validate consistent performance across many buyers or large order volumes. The transaction value is also not high enough to indicate strong bulk procurement activity based solely on the provided data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has active recent transactions and a favorable rating, which supports a reasonable level of commercial validation. The 80+ orders demonstrate market activity, but the transaction value and review count are not strong enough to classify the supplier as a high-volume, highly proven seller. Therefore, the score reflects stable but medium-to-lower commercial performance.

Final Score

14 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤5h
• Platform label: Low MOQ for customization
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier reports a response time of within 5 hours, which indicates acceptable communication efficiency for routine sourcing inquiries. This response speed is not at the highest service level, as the top service category requires response within 1 hour. However, ≤5h remains commercially practical for most standard procurement communication.

The supplier also has a “Low MOQ for customization” label, suggesting some customization flexibility with smaller order quantities. However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM, ODM, private label development, packaging customization, or design customization. Therefore, customization capability can only be assessed at a basic level.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates normal response capability and some flexibility through low-MOQ customization. However, because the response time is not within 1 hour and Full Customization is not confirmed, it cannot receive a top-tier service score. The score reflects adequate but not advanced service capability.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 87.5%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 87.5%. According to the defined scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% falls within the 7–8 point range. This indicates that the supplier has generally acceptable delivery reliability but is not yet at a strong performance level.

An 87.5% on-time delivery rate means that most orders are shipped on time, but there remains a measurable risk of delay. For buyers with strict seasonal sales windows, promotional schedules, or tight replenishment cycles, this delivery performance should be monitored carefully.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier falls near the upper end of the 80–89% delivery performance range. While this is acceptable for general procurement, it is below the 90%+ threshold required for stronger delivery confidence. Therefore, the supplier receives a solid but not excellent delivery score.

Final Score

8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.5
• Reviews: 20+
• Verified supplier: True
• Factory Verification: True, based on verified supplier status provided
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.5 store rating, which indicates generally positive customer satisfaction. The presence of 20+ reviews provides some feedback base, though the number is still relatively limited. This means the quality assessment has some customer validation but not a broad enough review volume to confirm strong consistency across a large buyer base.

The supplier is marked as verified, which supports basic factory credibility. However, there is no provided information confirming Finished Product Inspection, quality inspection procedures, quality control team size, defect rate, inspection reports, product testing, or third-party quality certifications. As a result, the quality assurance system cannot be considered fully proven based on the available data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier earns credit for a positive rating, existing customer reviews, and verified supplier status. However, the review volume is not large, and there is insufficient data on finished product inspection or formal quality management systems. This limits confidence in consistent quality control, especially for buyers with stricter quality requirements or large-volume orders.

Final Score

14 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Cixi Baishun Shoes Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium-volume footwear sourcing, especially slippers and home footwear products with low MOQ options. The supplier is appropriate for trial orders, online retail testing, flexible replenishment, and buyers who value Trade Assurance and verified supplier status.

The main strengths are its verified factory profile, Trade Assurance support, low-MOQ flexibility, acceptable response time, and active recent transaction record. Its 4.5 store rating and 80+ recent orders show that the supplier has a functioning commercial track record.

Key risks include moderate production scale, limited review volume, only 2 years of Gold Supplier history, 87.5% on-time delivery rate, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection or formal quality control systems. For larger orders, buyers should request production capacity details, pre-shipment inspection arrangements, product samples, and written delivery commitments before placing bulk purchases.

Overall, the supplier shows reasonable growth potential as a small-to-medium footwear supplier, but it should be used cautiously for time-sensitive or high-volume procurement until further quality and delivery validation is obtained.