zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Huizhou Jianyi Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Huizhou Jianyi Shoes Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based footwear supplier with a reported factory area of 1,200+㎡ and 90+ staff. The company shows moderate manufacturing capacity and has supplier verification status, supporting a reasonable level of operational credibility. On -related indicators, it has 2 years as a Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, and carries platform tags including Low MOQ for customization, Warranty available, and Finished product inspection. Business activity is comparatively strong, with 400+ orders and CN¥2.3M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.6 store rating and 100+ reviews. Delivery performance is particularly strong, with a 98.4% on-time shipment rate. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium batch footwear sourcing, especially where low MOQ and basic customization flexibility are important. Key limitations include relatively modest factory scale, only 2 years of Gold Supplier history, and insufficient data on full customization capability, detailed factory certifications, or third-party quality system certifications.

Huizhou Jianyi Shoes Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Company: Huizhou Jianyi Shoes Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 1,200+㎡
  • Employees: 90+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a defined factory footprint and workforce, indicating an established operating base rather than a pure trading profile based on the provided data. A factory area of 1,200+㎡ and 90+ employees suggests small-to-medium production capacity. The “Verified Supplier” status adds credibility to the company’s claimed operational presence, although no detailed audit report, production line count, annual capacity, or equipment list is provided.

The company therefore appears capable of handling regular footwear orders, especially small-to-medium volume procurement. However, compared with large-scale manufacturers, the available factory size and headcount do not indicate a large-volume industrial production base.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has verifiable basic factory strength, including physical factory scale, employee count, and supplier verification. However, the scale remains moderate rather than large, and there is insufficient data on production capacity, machinery, workshop structure, or formal factory certifications beyond supplier verification. This supports a mid-range score rather than a top-tier company strength rating.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / industry tags:
  • Low MOQ for customization
  • Warranty available
  • Finished product inspection

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators. Gold Supplier status and Trade Assurance support transaction security, while supplier verification improves confidence in the legitimacy of the business profile. The presence of Finished product inspection and Warranty available tags also strengthens the compliance and buyer protection profile.

However, the Gold Supplier history is only 2 years, which is relatively short compared with long-established platform suppliers. In addition, the data does not include recognized third-party factory certifications, ISO certifications, social compliance audits, or detailed inspection standards. Therefore, while the core platform credibility is solid, the compliance profile is not fully comprehensive.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets several core credibility requirements: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, supplier verification, and relevant platform tags. The short Gold Supplier duration limits the score from reaching the highest band. The absence of detailed external certifications or audit documentation also prevents a full-score assessment.

Final Score

17 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 400+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥2.3M+
  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Reviews: 100+

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates active commercial performance on the platform. More than 400 orders in the past six months indicates frequent buyer activity, while CN¥2.3M+ in transaction value shows meaningful sales volume. The store rating of 4.6 is positive, and 100+ reviews provide a reasonable base of customer feedback.

This level of transaction activity suggests that the supplier has already been tested by multiple buyers and is not dependent on unproven storefront claims. However, the rating is good rather than exceptional, and the review count, while meaningful, is not extremely large compared with highly mature suppliers.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows strong recent business validation through both order count and transaction value. The 4.6 rating and 100+ reviews support buyer confidence, though they do not indicate a flawless customer satisfaction record. Overall, this reflects strong but not maximum-level business performance.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤2h
  • Customization-related tag: Low MOQ for customization
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

A response time of within 2 hours indicates reasonably efficient communication and is suitable for most sourcing workflows. The “Low MOQ for customization” tag suggests some degree of customization support, especially for buyers requiring smaller customized batches.

However, the provided data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability. There is also no information on sample lead time, design support, packaging customization, language support, dedicated account management, or after-sales service process. Therefore, service capability can be considered functional and commercially useful, but not fully proven as advanced.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a good response speed and some customization-related capability. However, because the response time is not within 1 hour and Full Customization is not confirmed, the supplier does not qualify for the highest service score. The available evidence supports a stable but moderate service capability rating.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time shipment rate: 98.4%

Elaboration

The supplier’s delivery performance is a clear strength. A 98.4% on-time shipment rate is well above the 90% benchmark for strong delivery reliability. This indicates that the supplier has demonstrated effective order fulfillment discipline on the platform.

For procurement teams, this is an important positive indicator, especially when sourcing seasonal footwear or products with time-sensitive delivery requirements. However, the data does not include average lead time, peak-season capacity, logistics options, or historical delay causes.

Scoring Rationale

Based strictly on the provided on-time shipment rate, the supplier qualifies for the top scoring range in delivery performance. The 98.4% rate indicates strong reliability and supports a near-maximum score.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Reviews: 100+
  • Finished product inspection: Present as platform tag
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Warranty available: Present as platform tag

Elaboration

The supplier has several quality-supporting indicators. A 4.6 store rating and 100+ reviews suggest generally positive customer feedback. The Finished product inspection tag indicates that quality checks are part of the supplier’s displayed platform profile. Supplier verification also supports confidence in the company’s operational legitimacy.

However, the data does not provide detailed product defect rates, inspection standards, third-party quality certifications, customer complaint ratio, return rate, or specific factory audit findings. Therefore, while the quality profile is positive, it cannot be considered fully comprehensive.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a good rating, meaningful review volume, Finished product inspection, warranty availability, and verified supplier status. These support a strong quality and feedback score. The score is not higher because the review volume is moderate rather than extensive, and detailed quality system documentation is not provided.

Final Score

17 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 15 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 17 / 20
Business Performance 18 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 17 / 20
Total 84 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Huizhou Jianyi Shoes Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking footwear products with low-to-medium order quantities, basic customization flexibility, and reliable delivery performance. The supplier’s 400+ orders and CN¥2.3M+ transaction value over the past six months indicate solid commercial validation, while the 98.4% on-time shipment rate is a strong procurement advantage.

Suitable customer types:
- Small and medium-sized footwear buyers
- Buyers requiring low MOQ customization
- Importers or distributors seeking tested suppliers
- Buyers prioritizing delivery reliability and Trade Assurance protection

Main risks:
- Factory scale is moderate, not large-scale
- Gold Supplier history is only 2 years
- Full Customization capability is not confirmed
- Insufficient data on third-party factory certifications, ISO systems, production capacity, and detailed quality control procedures

Growth potential:
The supplier shows good transaction momentum, strong delivery discipline, and platform credibility. If it can provide more detailed factory audit records, quality certifications, and clearer customization capabilities, it could become a stronger candidate for larger or more structured sourcing programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Jinjiang Zhen'An Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinjiang Zhen'An Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinjiang Meipai Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinjiang Meipai Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chaozhou Ange Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chaozhou Ange Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chaozhou Daxin Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chaozhou Daxin Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuchuan Maoli Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuchuan Maoli Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chaozhou Jiesi Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chaozhou Jiesi Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Changchun Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Changchun Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cixi Baishun Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cixi Baishun Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cixi Aslipper Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cixi Aslipper Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuchuan Zhongtai Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuchuan Zhongtai Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinjiang Chenle Shoes And Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinjiang Chenle Shoes And Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jieyang Rongcheng District Good Good Wear Shoes Factory Supplier Evaluation
Jieyang Rongcheng District Good Good Wear Shoes Factory Supplier Evaluation
Ricoma (Huizhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ricoma (Huizhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Layeredsound Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Layeredsound Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pluscent Electrical(Huizhou) Limited Supplier Evaluation
Pluscent Electrical(Huizhou) Limited Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Youmei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Youmei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Suan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Suan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Mishiqi Watch Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Mishiqi Watch Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Hefa Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Hefa Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Wuxing Grinding Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Wuxing Grinding Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Putian New Huafeng Electronics Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Putian New Huafeng Electronics Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sachikoo Yongfa Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sachikoo Yongfa Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan City Jiubei Compressor Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan City Jiubei Compressor Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shengzhou Boyi Neckwear & Weaving Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shengzhou Boyi Neckwear & Weaving Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Chuanyang Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Chuanyang Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Comet Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Comet Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Zhongyi Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Zhongyi Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Five Plus Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Five Plus Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Keyi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Keyi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Longsheng Screw Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Longsheng Screw Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Boxiang Packaging Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Boxiang Packaging Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Qisheng Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Qisheng Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangmen Euron Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangmen Euron Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Sylon Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Sylon Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Weichenyang Technology Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Weichenyang Technology Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Kuanye Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Kuanye Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Maxcanopy Display Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Maxcanopy Display Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Oreno (Liangshan) International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Oreno (Liangshan) International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Ozone Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Ozone Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huangshan Mesorock Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huangshan Mesorock Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026