Chaozhou Daxin Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Chaozhou Daxin Shoes Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based footwear supplier in China, offering slippers, sandals, slides, and casual summer shoes with listed MOQs of 1,500 pairs per product and low unit price ranges in RMB. The company shows a basic-to-mid scale production profile, supported by a reported factory area of 1,800+ sqm, 100+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is moderate, with 4 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and a visible response-time label. Business validation is limited: only 5 orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value were recorded in the past six months, with no store rating and 0 reviews available. Delivery performance is strong based on a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate. This supplier may be suitable for price-sensitive buyers seeking basic footwear products with moderate MOQ requirements, but buyers should conduct additional quality checks due to insufficient customer feedback and missing quality inspection data.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Factory location: Guangdong, China
• Factory area: 1,800+ sqm
• Employees: 100+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Product scope includes slippers, sandals, slides, and casual summer shoes

Elaboration

The supplier presents a defined manufacturing footprint with more than 1,800 sqm of factory space and over 100 employees. This indicates a small-to-medium production base rather than a large-scale industrial operation. The product listings suggest concentration in low-cost footwear categories, mainly slippers, sandals, slides, and summer shoes. The consistent MOQ of 1,500 pairs across listed products indicates some batch-production capability.

The presence of verified supplier status strengthens the basic credibility of the company profile. However, the data does not provide annual capacity, production lines, machinery details, export markets, factory audit reports, or major customer references. Therefore, the production strength can be assessed as operationally established but not proven as large-scale.

Scoring Rationale

The company has more than minimal production resources and a verified supplier profile, which supports a score above the small-capacity range. However, the factory size of 1,800+ sqm and 100+ staff do not support classification as a large-scale supply chain. Missing production capacity and audit detail also limit the assessment.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / industry label: “Response time ≤7h”
• Other certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has several platform-level trust signals, including Gold Supplier status, 4 years of platform presence, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These indicators provide a reasonable level of transaction security and platform credibility.

However, the certification information is limited. The only listed tag is response-time related, which is a service-performance label rather than a product, factory, quality, or compliance certification. There is no provided evidence of ISO certification, product compliance testing, social compliance audits, or industry-specific quality certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has core credibility indicators, especially Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification. A 4-year Gold Supplier history is positive but not long enough to qualify as highly established. The lack of detailed compliance or certification labels prevents a higher score.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 5
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥67.6K+
• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded recent platform activity, but the scale is relatively limited. Five orders in the past six months indicates low transaction frequency. The transaction value of CN¥67.6K+ shows some commercial activity, but it does not demonstrate strong market validation or high-volume buyer demand.

The absence of a store rating and the presence of 0 reviews are important limitations. Without customer ratings or review volume, it is difficult to evaluate buyer satisfaction, repeat purchasing behavior, complaint history, or real-world order fulfillment quality.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has some transaction record, so it should not be rated as entirely unverified. However, both order count and transaction value are low, and the lack of ratings and reviews significantly weakens commercial validation. This places the supplier in the lower business-performance range.

Final Score

11 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤7h
• Platform label: “Response time ≤7h”
• Full Customization support: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a stated response time of within 7 hours, which indicates basic communication availability but does not meet the strongest service-performance threshold of response within 1 hour. The product names include the word “Custom” in some listings, but no explicit data confirms Full Customization capability, OEM/ODM service scope, sample development process, design support, or packaging customization.

As a result, the service capability can only be evaluated based on response speed. Communication appears acceptable, but customization depth is not sufficiently documented.

Scoring Rationale

A response time of ≤7h supports a normal service level, but it is not fast enough for the highest score range. Since Full Customization is not explicitly confirmed, the supplier should be rated as having basic but not advanced service capability.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time dispatch rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate, which is a strong delivery indicator. Based on the provided data, this suggests reliable dispatch performance for recorded orders.

However, the delivery score should still be interpreted alongside the limited order base. Since only 5 orders were recorded in the past six months, the 100.0% rate is positive but based on a small transaction sample. Larger order volumes would provide stronger confirmation of sustained delivery reliability.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. The supplier’s 100.0% rate supports a high score, while the limited transaction volume prevents assigning a perfect score with full confidence.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Number of reviews: 0
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: True / verified supplier status provided
• On-time dispatch: 100.0%, relevant to fulfillment but not direct product quality

Elaboration

Quality and customer feedback data are limited. The supplier has 0 reviews and no available store rating, meaning there is no direct customer feedback evidence to assess product consistency, comfort, durability, packaging quality, or after-sales handling.

The verified supplier status provides some baseline credibility, but the data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, formal quality control systems, testing procedures, inspection reports, or third-party product compliance. Therefore, quality assurance cannot be considered fully demonstrated based on the available information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a verified profile, which provides some quality-related credibility at the company level. However, the lack of reviews, missing store rating, and no confirmed Finished Product Inspection significantly restrict the quality assessment. This supports a low-to-basic score rather than a mid or high score.

Final Score

10 / 20

Total Score

68 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Chaozhou Daxin Shoes Co., Ltd. can be considered for cautious cooperation, especially for buyers seeking low-cost slippers, sandals, slides, and summer footwear with MOQ levels around 1,500 pairs. The supplier shows acceptable company strength, basic platform credibility, and strong reported delivery performance.

However, it is not recommended for immediate large-scale procurement without further validation. The main risks are limited recent order volume, 0 customer reviews, missing store rating, insufficient quality inspection data, and no confirmed product or factory compliance certifications beyond platform verification.

Recommended buyer types: - Price-sensitive wholesalers - Small to mid-sized importers testing basic footwear categories - Buyers willing to place trial orders before scaling - Customers who can arrange pre-shipment inspection or third-party quality checks

Key risk controls before cooperation: - Request product samples before bulk order - Confirm material specifications, sizing standards, and packaging details - Require pre-shipment inspection - Clarify defect handling and after-sales terms - Verify whether Finished Product Inspection or additional factory audit documentation is available

Overall, the supplier has moderate procurement potential, but its growth and suitability for larger buyers depend on stronger quality documentation, more transaction history, and improved customer feedback visibility.