zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Jiangxi Qingyunzhi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Jiangxi Qingyunzhi Clothing Co., Ltd.

Jiangxi Qingyunzhi Clothing Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Jiangxi Qingyunzhi Clothing Co., Ltd. is a China-based apparel supplier located in Jiangxi, with a reported factory area of 1,500+㎡ and 40+ staff. The company presents itself as an OEM/ODM clothing manufacturer, with listed products mainly including men’s shirts and casual apparel items. Its platform profile shows Gold Supplier status for 2 years, Trade Assurance support, supplier verification, and customization-related service tags including ODM service, full customization, and minor customization. Commercially, the supplier has achieved 100+ orders and CN¥473.2K+ transaction value over the past six months, with a store rating of 4.7 and 10+ reviews. Delivery performance is strong, with a 98.9% on-time dispatch rate. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for small to mid-sized buyers seeking customizable apparel with relatively low MOQ options. Key limitations include modest factory scale, short Gold Supplier history, limited review volume, and insufficient data on finished product inspection systems.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Factory location: Jiangxi, China
  • Factory area: 1,500+㎡
  • Employees: 40+ staff
  • Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
  • Product scope shown: OEM/custom clothing, men’s shirts, casual apparel items
  • Specific factory certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a clearly stated production base with a factory area exceeding 1,500㎡ and more than 40 staff members. This indicates the company has an established physical manufacturing setup rather than only a trading presence. The available product listings suggest capability in apparel production, especially shirts and casual clothing. The verified supplier status adds some confidence regarding the existence and legitimacy of the business operation.

However, based on the provided data, the factory size and workforce remain relatively modest compared with large-scale apparel manufacturers. There is no provided information on monthly production capacity, number of production lines, machinery configuration, export volume, or specific factory management certifications. Therefore, while the supplier demonstrates basic to moderate manufacturing capability, the available evidence does not support classification as a large-scale stable supply chain.

Scoring Rationale

The company has sufficient evidence of a real production base, a moderate factory area, a defined workforce, and supplier verification. These factors support a score above the lowest range. However, with only 1,500+㎡ and 40+ staff, the production scale appears closer to a small-to-medium apparel factory rather than a large industrial supplier. The absence of detailed production capacity and factory certification data limits confidence in scalability.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / platform tags:
  • ODM service available
  • Full customization
  • Minor customization
  • Response time ≤3h
  • Specific third-party compliance certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators. Gold Supplier status confirms a paid and recognized supplier profile on the platform, while Trade Assurance support provides buyers with a platform-backed transaction mechanism. The supplier is also marked as verified, which strengthens credibility compared with unverified sellers.

The certification and service tags are relatively complete from a platform service perspective, especially with ODM service and customization capabilities. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 2 years, which is not long enough to demonstrate a long-term operating record on . In addition, there is no data showing internationally recognized compliance certifications, social audits, product compliance certificates, or industry-specific quality certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core credibility elements expected from a platform-based apparel supplier: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verification, and customization tags. This supports a solid credibility score. The main limitation is the relatively short 2-year Gold Supplier history and the lack of disclosed third-party compliance or product certification information. Therefore, the supplier fits the “core certification complete but shorter platform history” range.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 100+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥473.2K+
  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Review count: 10+

Elaboration

The supplier has demonstrated measurable recent business activity, with over 100 orders and more than CN¥473.2K in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates that the company is actively receiving and fulfilling orders on the platform. The store rating of 4.7 is generally positive and suggests reasonable buyer satisfaction.

However, the review count is only 10+, which is relatively limited compared with suppliers that have a large and mature transaction history. The order and transaction values show commercial activity, but the data does not indicate a very high-volume or highly mature supplier profile. There is also no information about repeat buyers, export destinations, major customer types, or long-term customer retention.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows stable platform performance with a meaningful number of recent orders and a moderate transaction amount. A 4.7 rating supports positive buyer feedback, but the limited number of reviews reduces the strength of commercial validation. The performance is stronger than a low-activity supplier but does not reach the level of a high-volume, heavily reviewed supplier.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤3h
  • Platform tags include:
  • Full customization
  • Minor customization
  • ODM service available
  • Response time ≤1h: Not provided / Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a reasonable service capability profile. A response time of ≤3 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for international sourcing inquiries. The availability of full customization, minor customization, and ODM service suggests that the supplier can support buyers requiring product adjustments or customized apparel development.

However, the response time does not meet the highest service benchmark of ≤1 hour. Additionally, there is no provided information on English communication capability, sampling lead time, dedicated account management, design support depth, or after-sales service procedures. As a result, the service capability is favorable but not fully proven at a premium level.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of ≤3h response time and full customization capability supports a strong service score. The supplier appears suitable for buyers needing flexible apparel customization. However, because the response speed is not within the ≤1h top-tier range and detailed service process data is insufficient, a score just below the highest band is appropriate.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time dispatch rate: 98.9%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time dispatch rate is 98.9%, which is a strong delivery indicator. According to the scoring standard, suppliers with an on-time dispatch rate above 90% fall into the 9–10 point range. This data suggests that the supplier has been able to manage order dispatch schedules effectively on the platform.

It should be noted that the provided data only covers on-time dispatch rate. There is no information about average production lead time, shipping method, late delivery dispute rate, peak-season capacity, or logistics reliability after dispatch. Therefore, the delivery score is based strictly on the available on-time dispatch metric.

Scoring Rationale

A 98.9% on-time dispatch rate is clearly within the highest scoring band. This indicates strong platform-recorded delivery discipline. Since the metric is close to full reliability but lacks additional logistics and lead-time details, it still justifies a top-range score.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Review count: 10+
  • Verified supplier / factory verification: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Specific quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s store rating of 4.7 indicates generally positive customer feedback. The verified supplier status also provides a basic level of quality and operational credibility because the supplier has passed some form of platform verification. This is useful for buyers seeking a supplier with at least foundational verification support.

However, the review count is only 10+, which limits the statistical reliability of the customer feedback. Additionally, there is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, formal quality control certifications, inspection reports, defect rate data, or third-party product testing. For apparel sourcing, these missing data points are important because fabric quality, stitching consistency, sizing tolerance, and color accuracy are critical quality control factors. Since such quality control details are not available in the dataset, the quality evaluation must remain cautious.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a good rating and verified status, which supports a positive quality assessment. However, the low review volume and lack of disclosed Finished Product Inspection or formal quality assurance documentation prevent a higher score. The supplier appears to have basic quality credibility but not enough evidence to confirm a mature or comprehensive quality management system.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 13 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 16 / 20
Business Performance 15 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 15 / 20
Total Score 77 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Jiangxi Qingyunzhi Clothing Co., Ltd. is a suitable candidate for buyers seeking small to mid-sized apparel production, especially for customized shirts and casual clothing items. The supplier has verified status, Trade Assurance support, 2-year Gold Supplier history, full customization capability, and a strong 98.9% on-time dispatch rate. Its recent transaction activity of 100+ orders and CN¥473.2K+ in six months shows real commercial performance.

Suitable customer types:
- Small to medium apparel brands
- E-commerce sellers testing new clothing styles
- Buyers needing low to moderate MOQ flexibility
- Customers requiring OEM/ODM or customized apparel support

Main risk points:
- Factory scale is modest at 1,500+㎡ and 40+ staff
- Gold Supplier history is relatively short at 2 years
- Review count is limited at 10+
- Finished Product Inspection data is not provided
- Specific quality certifications and production capacity data are insufficient

Growth potential:
The supplier shows promising platform performance, strong delivery reliability, and customization capability. If it can provide more quality control documentation, inspection procedures, production capacity details, and accumulate more verified customer reviews, its procurement attractiveness would improve significantly. For initial cooperation, buyers should consider sample verification, small trial orders, and clear pre-shipment inspection requirements before scaling order volume.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Jiangxi Jingjinbao Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Jingjinbao Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Huadu Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Huadu Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Anka Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Anka Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengyuan Technology (Jiangxi) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengyuan Technology (Jiangxi) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Boman Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Boman Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Tianyin Paper Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Tianyin Paper Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pulek (Jiangxi) Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pulek (Jiangxi) Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Kangyi Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Kangyi Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Kingyuan Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Kingyuan Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Bno Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Bno Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Nanmeiyi Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Nanmeiyi Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Angeli Wire Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Angeli Wire Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Walker Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Walker Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Xintao Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Xintao Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Meierle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Meierle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Hedian Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Hedian Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Boska Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Boska Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Heying Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Heying Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Suihua Fiberglass Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Suihua Fiberglass Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nangong Jujing Machine Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nangong Jujing Machine Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Zhongshan Camill Foodstuffs Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Camill Foodstuffs Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Dongshou Sealing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Dongshou Sealing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Litharv New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Litharv New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Aopei Cosmetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Aopei Cosmetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Grace Kitchen Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Grace Kitchen Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Doy Label Co.,  Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Doy Label Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Handsome Beauty  Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Handsome Beauty Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Pinergy Solar Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Pinergy Solar Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Jinshengxing Machinery Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Jinshengxing Machinery Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Paishun Rubber And Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Paishun Rubber And Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Jinlinen Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Jinlinen Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Muyol Hair International Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Muyol Hair International Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining China Power Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining China Power Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Wenxingshang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Wenxingshang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Changsheng Cutting Tool Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Changsheng Cutting Tool Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Lituo Imp & Exp Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Lituo Imp & Exp Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Topko Product Group Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Topko Product Group Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Zhengdong Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Zhengdong Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Safely Lift Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Safely Lift Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Zhongdi Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Zhongdi Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026