Dongguan Yili Fang Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report: Dongguan Yili Fang Clothing Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Dongguan Yili Fang Clothing Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong, China-based apparel supplier focused on women’s custom clothing, including two-piece sets, workout tracksuits, streetwear, and custom logo garments. The supplier shows a commercially active profile, with 500+ orders and CN¥1.2M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by Trade Assurance, 2 years of Gold Supplier status, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, and a strong on-time delivery rate of 97.9%. Its listed MOQ of 50 sets across sampled products suggests accessibility for small to mid-sized buyers seeking customized women’s apparel. However, company scale information is limited: the factory area is only listed as 850+㎡ and employee count is not provided, which restricts confidence in production capacity assessment. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers requiring flexible customization and moderate-volume apparel sourcing, while large-scale buyers should further verify workforce size, monthly capacity, and quality control processes before placing large orders.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Final Score: 12 / 20

Basis

• Company: Dongguan Yili Fang Clothing Co., Ltd.
• Location: Guangdong, China
• Factory area: 850+㎡
• Employee count: Insufficient Data
• Verified supplier: True
• Product focus: women’s custom clothing, two-piece sets, workout tracksuits, streetwear, and custom logo apparel

Elaboration

The supplier has a defined production location in Guangdong and a listed factory area of 850+㎡. This indicates a physical operating base, but the available factory size suggests a relatively small-scale production setup compared with larger apparel manufacturers. The absence of employee count is a material limitation, as labor scale is highly relevant in garment production, especially for evaluating output capacity, production flexibility, and the ability to handle peak-season orders.

The supplier is marked as a verified supplier, which provides some baseline credibility regarding its business presence. However, the available data does not include detailed factory audit results, production line count, monthly output capacity, machinery information, or workforce structure.

Scoring Rationale

A score of 12 is appropriate because the supplier appears to have basic production capability and verified supplier status, but the factory scale is limited and employee information is missing. The company does not meet the profile of a large-scale stable supply chain based on the provided data. It is better categorized as a small factory or small-to-medium apparel supplier with basic verified operating capability.

Final Score

12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Final Score: 17 / 20

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / platform tags:
• Finished Product Inspection
• Response time ≤2h
• On-time delivery 97.9%
• Full Customization

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators. It is a Gold Supplier for 2 years and supports Trade Assurance, which gives buyers a degree of transaction protection through the platform. The supplier is also marked as verified, and its profile includes operational tags covering product inspection, response speed, delivery performance, and customization capability.

The 2-year Gold Supplier duration is positive but not long enough to be considered a long-established platform presence. The certification tags are commercially relevant, especially Finished Product Inspection and Full Customization, but the data does not provide details on third-party certifications, factory audit scope, compliance standards, or internationally recognized certifications.

Scoring Rationale

A score of 17 reflects that the supplier has a relatively complete credibility structure: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verification, and relevant operational tags. The main reason it does not score in the 18–20 range is the relatively short Gold Supplier history of 2 years and the absence of more detailed compliance or audit documentation in the provided data.

Final Score

17 / 20

3. Business Performance

Final Score: 17 / 20

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 500+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥1.2M+
• Store rating: 4.5
• Reviews: 60+

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates strong recent commercial activity, with more than 500 orders in the past six months and transaction value exceeding CN¥1.2M. This indicates that the supplier has ongoing buyer engagement and a proven ability to process marketplace orders. The order count is particularly strong for an apparel customization supplier.

The store rating of 4.5 is generally positive, though not exceptionally high. The review count of 60+ provides some customer feedback base, but it is not large enough to fully validate long-term quality consistency across a wide buyer population. Overall, the business activity level is solid, especially when combined with the transaction value and order volume.

Scoring Rationale

A score of 17 is justified because the supplier shows high order activity and meaningful transaction volume over the past six months. However, the 4.5 rating and 60+ reviews suggest that while business performance is strong, customer feedback depth is moderate rather than extensive. Therefore, the supplier ranks as commercially proven but not at the very highest validation level.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability

Final Score: 8 / 10

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤2h
• Platform tag: Full Customization
• Product listings indicate custom logo and OEM/custom apparel options

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of ≤2 hours indicates a reasonably efficient communication process. This is important for customized apparel orders, where buyers may need frequent communication regarding logos, colors, sizing, fabrics, packaging, and production details. The Full Customization tag further supports the supplier’s ability to handle buyer-specific requirements.

The sampled products also consistently emphasize customization, including custom logo, custom color, OEM custom tracksuits, and custom streetwear. However, the response time is not listed as ≤1 hour, which is the benchmark for the highest service score under the requested scoring framework.

Scoring Rationale

A score of 8 is appropriate because the supplier provides strong customization capability and has a good response time. It does not reach the 9–10 range because the response time is ≤2 hours rather than ≤1 hour. Still, for most small and mid-sized customized apparel procurement needs, the listed service capability appears commercially practical.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Final Score: 10 / 10

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 97.9%

Elaboration

The supplier’s listed on-time delivery rate of 97.9% is a strong delivery performance indicator. For apparel procurement, timely shipment is critical, particularly when products are seasonal, campaign-based, or linked to retail launch schedules. A rate above 90% meets the highest scoring band in the given framework.

The available data does not include average lead time, shipping methods, peak-season capacity, or historical delay reasons. Therefore, this score is based strictly on the provided on-time delivery percentage.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, suppliers with on-time delivery above 90% should receive 9–10 points. At 97.9%, this supplier demonstrates excellent delivery reliability based on the platform data provided. A full score is justified because the reported rate is significantly above the 90% threshold.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Final Score: 17 / 20

Basis

• Store rating: 4.5
• Reviews: 60+
• Finished Product Inspection: Yes
• Verified supplier: True
• On-time delivery: 97.9%

Elaboration

The supplier has a store rating of 4.5 with 60+ reviews, indicating generally positive customer feedback. The Finished Product Inspection tag is an important quality control indicator, suggesting that completed goods are subject to inspection before shipment. Verified supplier status also adds a level of platform-backed credibility.

However, the available data does not provide detailed inspection standards, defect rates, return rates, sample approval procedures, material testing processes, or third-party quality certifications. The number of reviews is useful but still moderate, so it does not fully establish broad long-term quality consistency.

Scoring Rationale

A score of 17 reflects a good quality profile supported by a positive rating, customer reviews, Finished Product Inspection, and supplier verification. The score is not higher because the rating is 4.5 rather than near-perfect, the review count is moderate, and more detailed quality system data is not available. The supplier appears to have practical quality controls but requires further verification for higher-risk or large-volume orders.

Final Score

17 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for selective cooperation, especially for small to mid-sized customized women’s apparel orders.

Dongguan Yili Fang Clothing Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking women’s custom clothing, custom logo apparel, two-piece sets, workout tracksuits, and streetwear with relatively low MOQ requirements of 50 sets. The supplier demonstrates strong recent marketplace activity, good delivery performance, Trade Assurance support, Finished Product Inspection, and Full Customization capability.

Suitable customer types:
- Small to mid-sized apparel brands
- Start-up fashion labels requiring low-MOQ customization
- Buyers sourcing women’s streetwear, tracksuits, and custom logo clothing
- Buyers needing flexible product customization with moderate order volume

Main risks:
- Employee count is not provided
- Factory area of 850+㎡ suggests limited production scale
- No detailed monthly capacity, production line, or machinery data
- No detailed quality inspection standards or third-party certification data provided
- Review count is moderate rather than extensive

Growth potential:
The supplier shows good platform performance, strong order activity, and excellent on-time delivery. If it can provide clearer factory capacity data, workforce information, and more detailed quality assurance documentation, its procurement suitability for larger buyers would improve.