zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Dongguan Yinshang Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Dongguan Yinshang Clothing Co., Ltd.

Dongguan Yinshang Clothing Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Dongguan Yinshang Clothing Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based apparel supplier with a reported factory area of 980+㎡ and verified supplier status. The company offers women’s fashion apparel products with relatively low MOQs of 50 pieces, indicating suitability for small to mid-sized buyers, boutique brands, test orders, and flexible sourcing programs. On , the supplier shows solid platform credibility with 5 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and certification/industry labels including Low MOQ for customization, Finished Product Inspection, and ODM service availability. Business activity is also notable, with 200+ orders and CN¥2M+ transaction value over the past six months, although the customer review count remains limited at 7 reviews. Delivery performance is strong, with a 95.9% on-time dispatch rate. Key limitations include insufficient employee data, limited factory scale information beyond area size, and no explicit Full Customization confirmation. Overall, this supplier appears appropriate for buyers seeking low-MOQ women’s fashion apparel with verified platform support.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Company name: Dongguan Yinshang Clothing Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 980+㎡
  • Employee count: Insufficient Data
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Product focus based on listed products: women’s fashion apparel, including tassel, pleated, breathable, slim street style, and sequin skirt items
  • MOQ: 50 pieces across listed products

Elaboration

The supplier has a disclosed factory area of 980+㎡, which indicates a physical production or operational base, but the scale is relatively limited compared with larger apparel manufacturers. The employee count is not provided, which restricts the ability to fully assess production depth, workforce stability, and capacity for large-volume manufacturing. The presence of verified supplier status adds some credibility to the factory’s existence and operational legitimacy.

The listed product range shows concentration in women’s fashion clothing, particularly skirts and style-driven seasonal garments. The consistent MOQ of 50 pieces suggests the supplier may be oriented toward flexible, smaller-batch production rather than purely mass-volume manufacturing. This can be attractive to emerging fashion brands, boutiques, and buyers testing new designs, but it does not by itself prove large-scale manufacturing capability.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic manufacturing capability through its factory area disclosure and verified supplier status. However, the factory size of 980+㎡ is modest, and the absence of employee count prevents a stronger conclusion about production scale, workforce capacity, and operational resilience. The supplier appears capable of handling small to mid-sized apparel orders, but the available data does not support classification as a large-scale stable supply chain.

Final Score

12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 5 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification/industry labels:
  • Low MOQ for customization
  • Finished product inspection
  • ODM service available

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively solid platform credibility profile. Five years as an Gold Supplier indicates a sustained platform presence rather than a newly established account. Trade Assurance availability provides buyers with a platform-supported transaction mechanism, which can reduce payment and delivery-related risks when used properly.

The verified supplier status further supports platform credibility. The listed labels also provide additional sourcing confidence, especially Finished Product Inspection and ODM service availability. These labels are relevant for apparel buyers requiring product checks and development support. However, the provided data does not include detailed third-party factory audit reports, specific management system certifications, social compliance certifications, or product compliance certifications. Therefore, while platform credibility is strong, broader compliance depth cannot be fully confirmed.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets several core credibility indicators: 5-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and relevant operational labels. This creates a credible sourcing profile. The score is not placed at the absolute maximum because the data does not provide details on formal factory certifications, social compliance audits, or specific certification documentation beyond platform labels.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 200+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥2M+
  • Store rating: 5.0
  • Number of reviews: 7

Elaboration

The supplier shows meaningful recent commercial activity. More than 200 orders in the past six months indicates active demand and repeat platform transaction capability. A transaction value above CN¥2M also suggests that the supplier is not limited to very small occasional orders and has demonstrated measurable business throughput.

The store rating of 5.0 is positive, but the number of reviews is only 7, which limits the statistical reliability of the rating. A perfect score based on a small review base is less conclusive than a similar rating supported by a large number of buyer reviews. Therefore, while order volume and transaction value are strong, customer feedback volume remains a constraint in evaluating long-term buyer satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates strong recent business momentum with 200+ orders and CN¥2M+ in transaction value over six months. These indicators support a solid commercial performance score. However, the limited review count prevents a top-tier rating because the public feedback sample is still small. The supplier appears commercially active and suitable for buyers seeking vendors with recent transaction validation, but additional buyer references or order history verification would strengthen confidence.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤3h
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data
  • Customization-related label: Low MOQ for customization
  • ODM service available: True

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of ≤3 hours is acceptable and indicates a reasonable communication standard for international sourcing. While it is not within the strongest benchmark of one hour or less, it still suggests that buyer inquiries are likely to receive timely attention.

The supplier has labels for Low MOQ for customization and ODM service availability, which indicates some level of customization or product development support. However, there is no explicit confirmation of Full Customization capability in the provided data. This distinction matters because ODM availability may support style development or design adjustment, while Full Customization could involve more complex buyer-specific design, material, fit, branding, or packaging requirements. Without explicit confirmation, the customization capability should be treated as useful but not fully verified.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s service capability is above basic level due to ≤3h response time and stated ODM/customization-related labels. However, it does not meet the highest service benchmark because response time is not ≤1 hour and Full Customization is not explicitly confirmed. The supplier should be considered suitable for routine inquiries, low-MOQ customization discussions, and ODM-related development, but buyers with complex customization needs should verify service scope before placing orders.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time dispatch rate: 95.9%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate of 95.9% is a strong delivery indicator. According to the scoring framework, delivery performance above 90% falls within the 9–10 point range. This suggests that the supplier has demonstrated reliable order dispatch performance on the platform.

For apparel sourcing, delivery reliability is especially important because fashion products are often seasonal and time-sensitive. A high dispatch rate can reduce the risk of missed sales windows, delayed launches, or inventory planning disruptions. However, the provided data only covers on-time dispatch rate and does not include average production lead time, logistics methods, late shipment causes, or delivery performance by order size.

Scoring Rationale

The 95.9% on-time dispatch rate supports a high delivery score. The supplier appears reliable in dispatch execution based on the available data. The score is not reduced significantly because the provided metric directly meets the highest delivery-performance band. Additional logistics and production lead-time data would provide a more complete delivery assessment, but the available indicator is clearly positive.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 5.0
  • Number of reviews: 7
  • Finished Product Inspection: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided; specific factory verification details beyond this are Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a 5.0 store rating, which is a positive quality and service indicator. The presence of a Finished Product Inspection label is also important, especially for apparel products where stitching, fabric condition, sizing, finishing, color consistency, and packaging can directly affect buyer satisfaction.

However, the number of reviews is limited to 7, so the rating does not yet represent a broad customer feedback base. The supplier’s verified status adds credibility, but the data does not provide detailed factory audit findings, inspection pass rates, defect rates, return rates, or third-party quality certification records. Therefore, the supplier shows good quality assurance signals, but the evidence base remains moderate rather than comprehensive.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier earns a strong but not top-level score in this category. The 5.0 rating and Finished Product Inspection label are meaningful positives, and verified supplier status supports credibility. The main limitation is the small review sample, which weakens the reliability of the customer feedback profile. Buyers should consider pre-shipment inspection, approval samples, and clear quality specifications before scaling orders.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 12 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 18 / 20
Business Performance 17 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 80 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Dongguan Yinshang Clothing Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers looking for women’s fashion apparel suppliers with low MOQ, platform transaction protection, ODM availability, and verified credibility. The supplier is particularly appropriate for boutique brands, small to mid-sized fashion retailers, online sellers, and buyers conducting trial orders or seasonal product testing.

The main strengths are its 5-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, 200+ recent orders, CN¥2M+ recent transaction value, 95.9% on-time dispatch rate, and Finished Product Inspection label. These indicators support reasonable sourcing confidence.

Key risks include insufficient employee data, modest disclosed factory area, limited public review count, and lack of explicit Full Customization confirmation. Buyers should verify production capacity, customization scope, sample quality, lead time, and inspection arrangements before scaling order volume.

Overall, the supplier shows good growth potential for flexible women’s fashion sourcing, especially where low MOQ and responsive platform-based cooperation are priorities.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Dongguan Naisen Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Naisen Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xixi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xixi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Jibenzhan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Jibenzhan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Ronghan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Ronghan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Chunzhen Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Chunzhen Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Tianpei Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Tianpei Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Keyi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Keyi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yingzi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yingzi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xinge Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xinge Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Lianpei Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Lianpei Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Haoxin Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Haoxin Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yunmei Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yunmei Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xingcan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xingcan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Metro Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Metro Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Luqi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Luqi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Manni Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Manni Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Gangyin Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Gangyin Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Shangcai Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Shangcai Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yingnati Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yingnati Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongyang Dais Hardware Products Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongyang Dais Hardware Products Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shanghai Pdyear Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Pdyear Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Litong Oster Composite New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Litong Oster Composite New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi New Qidian Welding Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi New Qidian Welding Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sectec Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sectec Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Wanhuacao Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Wanhuacao Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Taihui Shoe Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Taihui Shoe Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Sanfeng Cell Phone Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Sanfeng Cell Phone Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Yipeng Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Yipeng Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Luxun Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Luxun Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining Guopai Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining Guopai Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tigerwong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tigerwong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
King Feng Chuen Enterprise Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
King Feng Chuen Enterprise Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Dongfang Sunrise Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Dongfang Sunrise Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Minzhen Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Minzhen Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Taojun Refrigeration Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Taojun Refrigeration Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhenghongxin Precision Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhenghongxin Precision Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Grand Nets Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Grand Nets Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Baxin Electronic Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Baxin Electronic Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Pherobio Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pherobio Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Mecan Medical Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Mecan Medical Limited Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026