Shenzhen Tigerwong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Tigerwong Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, offering access control and security entrance products such as boom barriers, face recognition access gates, turnstile barriers, tripod gates, and related access control solutions. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a small-to-mid-sized verified supplier, with a factory area of 830+㎡ and 30+ staff. Its platform credibility is relatively strong, supported by 8 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and platform tags showing response time within 2 hours and 100% on-time delivery. Commercial performance is notable, with 100+ orders and CN¥5.2M+ transaction value over the past six months, although the review count is limited at 10+. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ access control equipment with verified platform credibility and strong delivery performance. Key limitations include relatively small production scale and insufficient data on full customization capability, formal product inspection systems, and detailed factory certifications.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Company: Shenzhen Tigerwong Technology Co., Ltd.
• Location: Guangdong, China
• Factory area: 830+㎡
• Employees: 30+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Product range includes boom barriers, face recognition access gates, turnstile barriers, tripod gates, and access control-related products.

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively compact operating scale, with a factory area of slightly above 830㎡ and a workforce of more than 30 employees. This indicates that the company has basic in-house operating capacity but does not demonstrate the scale of a large industrial manufacturer based on the provided data. The presence of multiple access control and entrance management product categories suggests a focused product portfolio in security gate and access control systems.

The “verified supplier” status is a positive factor, as it provides some level of third-party or platform-backed confirmation of supplier existence and operational legitimacy. However, the provided data does not include detailed factory certifications, production line numbers, monthly output capacity, machinery list, R&D team size, or quality management certifications. Therefore, the company’s production depth and scalability cannot be fully confirmed.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates basic production capability through its factory area, staff size, and verified status. However, its physical scale is relatively small, and there is insufficient data to confirm large-scale manufacturing capability or advanced factory certification. It is stronger than an unverified small trading entity, but it does not meet the threshold of a large-scale stable supply chain.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 8 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Certification / platform tags: “Response time ≤2h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively strong platform profile. An 8-year Gold Supplier history indicates long-term platform presence, which is a meaningful credibility factor in supplier screening. Trade Assurance support also improves transactional security for buyers, especially for international procurement scenarios where payment protection and order dispute mechanisms are important.

The platform tags show operational reliability indicators, including response time within 2 hours and 100% on-time delivery. In addition, the company is marked as a verified supplier, further improving its compliance credibility. However, the data does not show detailed certification labels such as ISO certification, CE, RoHS, FCC, or other product-specific compliance documents. Therefore, while platform credibility is strong, compliance completeness cannot be fully confirmed.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs well in platform credibility due to 8 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These are strong trust indicators for -based sourcing. The score is not at the absolute maximum because the provided certification data does not include detailed product or factory compliance certificates beyond platform-level tags.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 100+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥5.2M+
• Store rating: 4.8
• Reviews: 10+

Elaboration

The supplier shows solid recent commercial activity. More than 100 orders in the past six months indicates active market demand and a reasonable level of buyer acceptance. The transaction value of CN¥5.2M+ is significant relative to the visible order count and suggests that the supplier is handling orders of meaningful commercial value.

The store rating of 4.8 is positive and indicates generally favorable buyer satisfaction. However, the review count is only 10+, which limits the statistical reliability of the rating. A high rating based on a limited review base should be interpreted with caution because it does not provide the same confidence level as a supplier with hundreds or thousands of reviews.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has strong six-month transaction data, with both order count and transaction value showing clear commercial validation. The 4.8 rating further supports positive buyer experience. However, the relatively limited review count prevents the supplier from being classified as fully high-volume and broadly validated from a feedback perspective.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤2h
• Platform tag: “Response time ≤2h”
• Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 2 hours is a positive service indicator. This suggests that the company is reasonably responsive to buyer inquiries and may be suitable for time-sensitive quotation or pre-sales communication. Fast response is especially important for access control and security equipment buyers who may need technical clarification before purchase.

However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization as a formal capability. Although one listed product title includes the word “Customizable,” this alone is not sufficient to confirm platform-level full customization service, engineering customization depth, private labeling, ODM/OEM capability, or tailored system integration support. Therefore, customization capability must be marked as insufficiently verified.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs well in communication speed, but the response time is ≤2h rather than ≤1h. In addition, full customization capability is not clearly confirmed in the provided data. As a result, the supplier demonstrates acceptable service responsiveness but not enough verified evidence for top-tier service capability.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
• Platform tag: “On-time delivery 100.0%”

Elaboration

The supplier’s delivery performance is excellent based on the provided data. A 100.0% on-time delivery rate indicates that the supplier has been able to meet agreed shipping timelines for recorded platform orders. This is particularly important for project-based procurement, installation schedules, and buyers managing downstream construction, facility management, or security system deployment timelines.

However, the data does not specify the number of orders used to calculate this on-time delivery rate, nor does it provide lead time ranges, shipping methods, or historical delay cases. Therefore, while the available indicator is very strong, it should still be monitored during actual procurement execution.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, it deserves a full score in this category based strictly on the provided data.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.8
• Reviews: 10+
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: Verified supplier / factory audit status provided as True

Elaboration

The supplier’s store rating of 4.8 indicates favorable customer feedback. This is a positive quality signal, particularly when combined with the supplier’s verified status. The company also has visible recent business performance, which indirectly supports market acceptance of its products.

However, the review count is only 10+, which is not large enough to provide highly robust quality validation. In addition, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier has a Finished Product Inspection process or any formal quality assurance certification. For access control and security gate products, product reliability, electronic component quality, mechanical durability, and after-sales support are important, but the provided dataset does not include enough information to assess these areas in detail.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a good rating and verified status, supporting a reasonable level of quality confidence. However, the limited number of reviews and insufficient data on finished product inspection systems prevent a higher score. The quality profile is acceptable but not fully proven through extensive customer feedback or documented inspection procedures.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Shenzhen Tigerwong Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking access control and entrance management products with low MOQ requirements, active transaction history, Trade Assurance protection, and strong delivery reliability. The supplier is particularly appropriate for small-to-medium procurement projects, pilot orders, distributors testing product-market fit, and buyers requiring responsive communication within a platform-protected transaction environment.

The main risks are the relatively small factory scale, limited employee count, limited review volume, and insufficient data regarding full customization capability, finished product inspection, detailed factory certifications, and product compliance documents. Buyers should request additional documentation before placing large or technically complex orders, including product test reports, quality inspection procedures, warranty terms, production capacity details, and any relevant compliance certificates.

Overall, the supplier shows strong platform credibility, good recent commercial activity, and excellent reported delivery performance. Its growth potential appears positive within the access control and security gate segment, but larger-scale procurement should proceed with sample validation, technical confirmation, and staged order placement.