Ambohr Electric Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Ambohr Electric Co., Limited is a China-based supplier located in Shaanxi, offering oxygen-related industrial equipment such as oxygen concentrators, oxygen generators, oxygen plants, and gas disposal machinery. The supplier shows a basic-to-moderate manufacturing profile, with a reported factory area of 4,900+㎡, 60+ staff, and verified supplier status. On , the company has relatively strong platform credibility, supported by 8 years as a Gold Supplier and Trade Assurance availability. Its recent business activity is moderate, with 80+ orders and CN¥676.1K+ transaction value over the past six months. However, the store rating of 3.9 and 20+ reviews indicate limited customer feedback depth. Service response is within 4 hours, but no Full Customization capability is provided. Delivery performance is acceptable at 87.9% on-time delivery. Overall, this supplier may suit small to mid-sized buyers seeking low-MOQ oxygen equipment sourcing, while quality validation and pre-shipment inspection should be prioritized.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory location: Shaanxi, China
- Factory area: 4,900+㎡
- Employees: 60+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a physical factory footprint and a defined workforce, indicating that it has basic production and operational capacity. A factory size of 4,900+㎡ and 60+ employees suggest a small-to-medium manufacturing setup rather than a large-scale industrial production base. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the company’s stated operational presence, although no additional factory audit details, production line count, annual capacity, or factory certification information is provided.

Scoring Rationale:
The company appears to have stable basic manufacturing capability, supported by factory area, staff count, and supplier verification. However, the scale is not large enough to classify it as a major production base, and there is insufficient data on production capacity, equipment, or factory certifications. Therefore, it fits best within the lower-to-mid range of a stable medium/small manufacturer.

Final Score: 14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 8 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry labels: “Response time ≤4h”, “On-time delivery 87.9%”
- Product or industry certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier has a solid platform credibility profile, mainly supported by 8 years of Gold Supplier status and Trade Assurance participation. These factors indicate a longer operating history on and provide buyers with basic transaction protection. The verified supplier status further improves platform trustworthiness. However, the available labels are mainly service and delivery-related, not product compliance or industry certification labels. There is no provided evidence of medical, industrial, electrical, quality management, or export-related certification.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier performs strongly in platform-level credibility because of its long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and verification status. The score is not at the maximum level because the certification label set is incomplete from a compliance perspective, and no product or factory compliance certificates are provided.

Final Score: 18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 80+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥676.1K+
- Store rating: 3.9
- Reviews: 20+

Elaboration:
The supplier shows measurable recent commercial activity, with 80+ orders and CN¥676.1K+ transaction value over six months. This indicates that the supplier has active demand and some level of market validation. However, the review count is relatively limited, and the store rating of 3.9 is moderate rather than strong. The business record supports basic commercial reliability but does not indicate high-volume or premium customer satisfaction performance.

Scoring Rationale:
The order and transaction levels are acceptable for a moderate supplier, but the rating and review base reduce confidence. A 3.9 store score suggests buyer experience may be mixed or not consistently strong. The supplier demonstrates real commercial traction, but not enough to qualify as a high-performance supplier.

Final Score: 14 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤4h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier provides a response time within 4 hours, which suggests reasonable communication speed for buyer inquiries. This is suitable for standard sourcing communication and early-stage quotation discussions. However, there is no provided evidence that the supplier supports Full Customization, engineering customization, OEM/ODM service, private labeling, or project-based customization.

Scoring Rationale:
The response speed is acceptable but does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. Since Full Customization capability is not provided, the service capability should be considered basic rather than advanced. This makes the supplier more suitable for standard product procurement than highly customized sourcing projects.

Final Score: 6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 87.9%

Elaboration:
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 87.9% falls within the 80–89% range. This indicates generally acceptable delivery reliability, but there remains a meaningful risk of delayed shipments. For buyers with strict project deadlines, this performance level may require closer order tracking, confirmed lead times, and clear delivery terms before purchase.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. At 87.9%, the supplier is near the upper end of this band but still below the 90% threshold required for top delivery scoring.

Final Score: 8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 3.9
- Reviews: 20+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: True / verified supplier status provided

Elaboration:
The supplier has limited but available customer feedback, with 20+ reviews and a store rating of 3.9. This provides some quality-related visibility, but the feedback base is not large, and the rating is not high. Verified supplier status gives some confidence in the company’s existence and basic operational profile, but no Finished Product Inspection information is provided. There is also no supplied data on product testing, inspection procedures, defect rates, warranty policy, or quality certifications.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has partial quality assurance support through verification and customer reviews, but the moderate rating and limited review count restrict confidence. The absence of Finished Product Inspection data is a significant gap for industrial oxygen-related equipment sourcing, where performance consistency and safety checks are important procurement considerations.

Final Score: 12 / 20

Total Score

72 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for buyers seeking low-MOQ oxygen-related industrial equipment from a supplier with solid platform credibility and moderate recent transaction activity. This supplier is more suitable for small to mid-sized buyers, trial orders, sample-based procurement, or standard product sourcing rather than highly customized or high-risk large-volume projects.

Key risks include moderate store rating, limited review volume, insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, and no provided product certification or detailed factory audit information. Growth potential exists due to 8 years of Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and active recent transactions. Buyers should request product certificates, inspection reports, warranty terms, and pre-shipment inspection before placing larger orders.