Guangdong Sutai Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report

Supplier: Guangdong Sutai Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd.
Country/Region: Guangdong, China

Executive Summary

Guangdong Sutai Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. appears to be a medium-sized electrical appliance supplier with a reported factory area of over 8,100㎡ and more than 120 staff. The supplier is listed as a verified/audited supplier and has 4 years of Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and a reported 100.0% on-time delivery rate. Its recent platform performance is relatively solid, with 200+ orders and CN¥1M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.7 store rating and 60+ reviews.

The supplier’s product listings cover small household and kitchen appliances, including air fryers, stainless-steel jug products, and non-stick kitchen appliance items. Based on the available data, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking mid-scale sourcing from a platform-verified Chinese appliance manufacturer with stable transaction records and strong delivery reliability. Key data gaps include lack of clear information on Full Customization capability and Finished Product Inspection systems.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Factory area: 8,100+㎡
• Employees: 120+ staff
• Verified/audited supplier: True
• Location: Guangdong, China

Elaboration

The supplier has a factory size exceeding 8,100㎡ and a workforce of more than 120 employees, indicating a meaningful production base rather than a very small trading operation. The presence of an audited or verified supplier status further supports the credibility of its manufacturing setup. Guangdong is also a major manufacturing region in China, but no additional external assumptions are made beyond the provided location data.

The available data suggests the company has sufficient physical and human resources to handle regular appliance production orders. However, the data does not provide detailed production capacity, number of production lines, annual output, machinery list, R&D team size, or export market coverage. Therefore, while the company shows stable medium-scale manufacturing strength, it cannot be classified as a large-scale supply chain operator based only on the provided information.

Scoring Rationale

Given the factory area, employee count, and verified/audited supplier status, the supplier fits the profile of a medium-sized stable factory. It demonstrates stronger capacity than a small workshop, but the absence of detailed production-scale indicators prevents a higher score in the 18–20 range. The company has a credible manufacturing base, but the available evidence is not sufficient to confirm large-scale supply chain capability.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified/audited supplier: True
• Certification/industry tags provided:
• On-time delivery 100.0%
• Response time ≤6h

Elaboration

The supplier has 4 years of Gold Supplier history, which provides a reasonable platform credibility record. Trade Assurance support is also a positive factor, as it gives buyers a platform-based transaction protection mechanism. The verified/audited supplier status adds another layer of credibility regarding the supplier’s presence and business legitimacy.

However, the available certification or industry tag information is limited. The listed tags mainly relate to operational performance, such as on-time delivery and response time. There is no provided evidence of product compliance certifications, factory management system certifications, export certifications, or third-party product testing reports. Therefore, the supplier demonstrates a solid platform credibility profile but does not show a fully comprehensive compliance documentation system based on the supplied data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has core platform trust indicators: Gold Supplier status, 4-year platform history, Trade Assurance, and verified/audited status. These support a relatively strong credibility assessment. However, the score is not placed in the highest range because the compliance-related data is incomplete, and no specific product or factory management certifications are provided. This makes the supplier credible on-platform but not fully validated from a broader compliance perspective.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 200+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥1M+
• Store rating: 4.7
• Number of reviews: 60+

Elaboration

The supplier has achieved over 200 orders and more than CN¥1M in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates active commercial operations and a measurable level of buyer acceptance on the platform. The 4.7 store rating is positive, and the presence of 60+ reviews provides some degree of customer feedback visibility.

The order count and transaction value suggest the supplier is commercially active and has passed a basic market validation stage. However, the data does not show repeat buyer rate, major customer profiles, export destination markets, category-specific sales distribution, or historical growth trend. As a result, the supplier’s performance can be considered stable and above basic level, but not enough to classify it as a top-tier high-volume performer.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s 200+ orders and CN¥1M+ transaction value over six months show a healthy operating record. Combined with a 4.7 rating and 60+ reviews, this supports a strong but not exceptional business performance score. The review volume is meaningful but not very large, and the transaction value is solid but does not alone prove large-scale market dominance. Therefore, the supplier fits the upper-middle performance range.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤6h
• Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported response time of within 6 hours indicates acceptable communication responsiveness for international procurement communication. This is suitable for general inquiry handling, quotation discussions, and order follow-up. However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, private label, OEM/ODM services, packaging customization, design customization, or engineering support.

The product listing includes one item described as “Factory Custom,” but this alone is not sufficient to confirm a structured Full Customization capability. Therefore, customization capability must be marked as Insufficient Data rather than assumed.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs reasonably well in responsiveness, but the response time is not within the highest-performing ≤1 hour range. Since Full Customization capability is not clearly confirmed, the service capability score should remain in the normal-to-good range rather than the top range. The supplier appears capable of standard communication and basic service handling, but its advanced customization service capability remains unverified.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery-related indicator in the provided data. This suggests that, based on platform-recorded or supplier-provided performance information, the supplier has maintained reliable shipment timing. For procurement teams, this is a significant positive factor, particularly for buyers managing inventory cycles, seasonal sales, or platform fulfillment deadlines.

However, the data does not include average lead time, production cycle length, logistics options, peak-season delivery performance, or late-shipment dispute records. Therefore, the assessment is based strictly on the reported on-time delivery rate.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier’s reported rate is 100.0%, it deserves the highest score in this dimension. Although other logistics details are not available, the stated delivery performance indicator is excellent.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.7
• Number of reviews: 60+
• Verified/audited supplier: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: True / audited supplier indicated

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.7 store rating, which reflects generally positive customer feedback. The 60+ reviews provide a moderate level of review volume, giving buyers some visibility into previous customer experience. The verified/audited supplier status also supports a basic quality credibility foundation, especially regarding the supplier’s operational presence.

However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier has a Finished Product Inspection process, third-party inspection support, quality management certifications, defect rate records, product testing reports, or compliance documents for specific markets. Since the supplier operates in electrical appliance categories, quality control information would be especially important, but it is not available in the provided dataset.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows good customer feedback and some verified supplier credibility, supporting a positive quality assessment. However, the review count is moderate rather than extensive, and the absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection information prevents a higher score. The supplier appears to have acceptable quality feedback based on platform data, but its formal quality assurance system remains only partially visible.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Guangdong Sutai Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking a medium-scale Chinese supplier for small household and kitchen appliance products, especially buyers who value platform credibility, Trade Assurance support, active transaction records, and strong reported delivery performance. The supplier may be appropriate for trial orders, small-to-medium batch procurement, and buyers requiring relatively low MOQ product sourcing based on the listed product information.

Suitable customer types:
- Small and medium importers
- E-commerce sellers
- Retail buyers testing appliance SKUs
- Buyers seeking suppliers with platform transaction history and Trade Assurance support

Main risks:
- Full Customization capability is Insufficient Data
- Finished Product Inspection information is Insufficient Data
- No provided details on product certifications, testing reports, production lines, annual capacity, or export compliance
- Review volume is moderate, not extensive

Growth potential:
The supplier shows solid commercial activity, credible platform status, and excellent reported delivery performance. If it can provide clearer quality inspection procedures, product compliance documents, and customization capability evidence, its procurement attractiveness would improve further.