Wuxi Shengye Tebang New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Wuxi Shengye Tebang New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Jiangsu, offering filter media products such as Polyester High Speed Fiber Filter Media and Biodegradable PP Filter Cotton Roll OEM. Based on the provided data, the company shows a moderate-to-solid manufacturing foundation, with an 11,000+㎡ factory area, 120+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is relatively strong, supported by 8 years as a Gold Supplier and Trade Assurance availability. Commercial activity appears active but not large-scale, with 50+ orders and CN¥135.2K+ transaction value over the past six months. The store rating is strong at 5.0, but the review base is limited at 10+ reviews. The main operational concern is delivery reliability, with an on-time delivery rate of 76.9%, which is below ideal procurement standards. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking mid-scale filter material sourcing with platform-backed transaction protection, while requiring closer delivery monitoring.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company name: Wuxi Shengye Tebang New Materials Technology Co., Ltd.
• Location: Jiangsu, China
• Factory area: 11,000+㎡
• Employees: 120+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Product scope provided: Polyester High Speed Fiber Filter Media; Biodegradable PP Filter Cotton Roll OEM

Elaboration

The supplier has a documented factory area exceeding 11,000㎡ and more than 120 employees, indicating a tangible manufacturing base rather than a purely trading-oriented profile based on the provided data. The scale suggests the company has basic-to-medium production capacity for filter media-related products. The verified supplier status further supports the existence of some level of supplier validation.

However, the available data does not include detailed production line numbers, annual output capacity, equipment lists, factory audit reports, or international manufacturing certifications. Therefore, while the company appears to have a stable physical production foundation, its full production depth and process sophistication cannot be completely assessed from the current dataset.

Scoring Rationale

The factory size and employee count place the supplier above a small workshop level and support classification as a medium-sized manufacturing operation. Verified supplier status adds credibility to its operational base. However, the absence of detailed factory audit documentation, production capacity figures, or specific factory certifications prevents a higher score in the 18–20 range, which would typically require stronger evidence of large-scale and highly stable supply-chain capability.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 8 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Platform/industry labels: “Response time ≤2h”, “On-time delivery 76.9%”

Elaboration

The supplier has been an Gold Supplier for 8 years, which indicates relatively long-term platform presence. Trade Assurance availability provides buyers with additional transaction protection through the platform. The supplier is also marked as verified, which strengthens its basic compliance credibility on the platform.

The platform labels available are mainly operational indicators, including response time and on-time delivery rate. No additional industry certifications, product compliance certificates, environmental certifications, or quality management system certificates are provided in the dataset. Therefore, the platform credibility is strong, but the broader compliance profile remains partially incomplete.

Scoring Rationale

An 8-year Gold Supplier history combined with Trade Assurance and verified supplier status represents a solid platform credibility structure. This supports a relatively high score. However, the certification/industry label information is limited and does not show a complete compliance certification package. Because of this, the supplier falls slightly below the top tier that would require more comprehensive certification evidence.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 50+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥135.2K+
• Store rating: 5.0
• Reviews: 10+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 50 orders in the past six months, showing active commercial engagement on the platform. The transaction value of CN¥135.2K+ indicates measurable sales activity, although it does not suggest very large-scale transaction volume based on the provided figures. The store rating of 5.0 is positive, but the number of reviews is relatively limited at 10+, meaning the customer feedback sample size is not yet broad.

The available performance data supports the conclusion that the supplier has real transaction history and some market validation. However, the current order and transaction volume are more consistent with a stable but moderate business profile rather than a high-volume supplier.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates legitimate recent business activity, supported by 50+ orders and a positive rating. However, the transaction value is moderate, and the review count remains relatively small. This limits the strength of business validation. The score reflects stable but not high-volume commercial performance.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤2h
• Platform label: “Response time ≤2h”
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of ≤2 hours indicates reasonably efficient communication and suggests that inquiries are likely to receive timely replies. This is beneficial for procurement processes involving quotation requests, order clarification, and pre-shipment coordination.

However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization. One product name includes “OEM,” but the dataset does not provide a formal Full Customization capability label or detailed customization scope. Therefore, customization ability cannot be fully evaluated beyond the limited product description.

Scoring Rationale

The response time is good but does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. The lack of confirmed Full Customization data prevents assignment of a top-tier score. The supplier appears service-responsive, but its advanced customization service capability remains insufficiently evidenced.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 76.9%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 76.9%. According to the defined scoring standard, a delivery performance level between 70% and 79% corresponds to a score range of 5–6 points. This indicates that while the supplier does complete deliveries, delivery reliability is not at a high-performance level.

For procurement buyers, this metric is a meaningful risk factor, especially for replenishment programs, production-linked purchasing, or buyers with strict delivery schedules. Orders may require stronger lead-time confirmation, written delivery commitments, and proactive shipment tracking.

Scoring Rationale

The on-time delivery rate falls clearly within the 70–79% range. This places the supplier below preferred procurement reliability levels. Although not critically poor, the figure suggests a need for delivery risk management and prevents a higher delivery score.

Final Score

6 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 5.0
• Reviews: 10+
• Verified supplier: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: True, based on verified supplier status provided

Elaboration

The supplier has a 5.0 store rating, which is a positive indicator of customer satisfaction. However, the review count is only 10+, so the rating is based on a limited number of customer evaluations. This reduces the statistical strength of the feedback profile.

The supplier is marked as verified, which provides some quality and credibility support at the supplier level. However, there is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, third-party product testing, quality management certifications, or detailed inspection procedures. Therefore, the quality assurance system cannot be considered fully transparent based on the available data.

Scoring Rationale

The high store rating supports a favorable quality impression, but the low review volume and absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection limit confidence. Verified supplier status adds some assurance, but not enough to classify the supplier as having a comprehensive quality control framework. The score reflects good early feedback with incomplete quality-system visibility.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation recommended.

Wuxi Shengye Tebang New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers seeking filter media and filter cotton roll products from a medium-scale China-based supplier with platform credibility, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. The company is likely more appropriate for buyers with moderate procurement volumes, flexible delivery schedules, and a willingness to manage supplier performance through platform-protected transactions.

Suitable customer types:
- Buyers sourcing polyester filter media or PP filter cotton roll products
- Importers requiring Trade Assurance protection
- Customers looking for mid-scale suppliers with verified factory presence
- Buyers who can tolerate some delivery variability and manage lead times carefully

Main risk points:
- On-time delivery rate is only 76.9%, requiring delivery monitoring
- Review count is limited at 10+, reducing the depth of customer feedback validation
- Finished Product Inspection information is not provided
- Full Customization capability is not confirmed
- No specific product certifications or quality system certifications are provided in the dataset

Growth potential:
The supplier has a solid platform foundation, 8 years of Gold Supplier history, verified status, and active recent transaction records. If it improves delivery reliability and provides clearer quality control documentation, it could become a stronger candidate for more structured and repeat procurement programs.