zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Wuxi Yongtai Building Sealing Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Wuxi Yongtai Building Sealing Materials Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Jiangsu, with a reported factory area of 9,400+ sqm and 40+ staff. The company appears to focus on building sealing, waterproofing, epoxy floor coating, polyurethane roof paint, and related coating materials based on the listed product data. Its platform profile shows 2 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and customization-related service labels including Full Customization, ODM service available, and Minor Customization. Business performance is moderate, with 70+ orders and CN¥135.2K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.9 store rating but only 10+ reviews. Delivery performance is strong with a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate, and response time is within 1 hour. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking coating and waterproofing products with responsive communication and flexible customization, while larger buyers should further verify quality systems, production capacity depth, and inspection documentation before scaling orders.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Jiangsu, China
- Factory area: 9,400+ sqm
- Employees: 40+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Product scope includes epoxy self-leveling materials, polyurethane roof paint, waterproof coating, epoxy floor coating, and roof renovation coating products

Elaboration
The supplier has a physical production base of over 9,400 sqm, which indicates a meaningful manufacturing footprint rather than a very small workshop-level operation. The staff size of 40+ suggests a small-to-medium production team. The company is also marked as a verified supplier, which adds a basic layer of credibility regarding its existence and operational presence. However, the available data does not provide detailed information on annual production capacity, number of production lines, machinery, laboratory capability, R&D staffing, or formal factory certifications beyond the verified supplier status.

Scoring Rationale
The factory area is relatively solid, and the company appears to have basic manufacturing capability for building sealing and coating-related products. However, the employee count is not large, and there is insufficient data on production scale, equipment, quality laboratory infrastructure, or internationally recognized factory certifications. Therefore, the company fits best into the category of a small-to-medium supplier with basic verified production capability, rather than a large-scale stable supply chain.

Final Score
14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry tags: Warranty available, Full customization, ODM service available, Minor customization

Elaboration
The supplier has several key credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These features improve transaction security and provide buyers with a more structured sourcing environment. The available tags also indicate service-related capabilities such as warranty availability and customization support. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 2 years, which is relatively short compared with long-established platform suppliers. No third-party management system certifications, product compliance certificates, or internationally recognized quality certifications are provided in the supplied data.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has the core platform credibility elements expected for a usable supplier: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification. The short 2-year Gold Supplier history limits the strength of its long-term platform credibility. In addition, while the service tags are useful, they do not replace formal compliance or product certification evidence. The score reflects a supplier with core platform safeguards in place but not yet a long-proven compliance profile.

Final Score
16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 70+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥135.2K+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 10+

Elaboration
The supplier has generated more than 70 orders over the past six months, which shows active commercial engagement on the platform. The reported transaction value of CN¥135.2K+ indicates real sales activity, though the value is moderate rather than high. The store rating of 4.9 is strong and suggests generally positive buyer satisfaction. However, the review count is only 10+, which limits the statistical reliability of the rating and makes it harder to assess consistency across a wider buyer base.

Scoring Rationale
The business performance is commercially validated but not yet at a high-volume level. The order count is respectable for a medium activity supplier, and the rating is strong. However, the transaction value is not especially large, and the limited review base reduces confidence in the consistency of customer satisfaction. This supports a mid-range score for stable but not outstanding marketplace performance.

Final Score
15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤1h
- Full Customization: listed
- ODM service available: listed
- Minor customization: listed
- Warranty available: listed

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within 1 hour is a strong indicator of communication efficiency and operational responsiveness. The presence of Full Customization, ODM service available, and Minor Customization tags suggests that the supplier can support different levels of buyer-specific requirements. Warranty availability also indicates some level of after-sales service positioning. However, the data does not include details such as sample lead time, engineering support, language capability, dedicated account management, or customization case history.

Scoring Rationale
The combination of fast response time and customization-related service tags supports a high service capability score. Since the response time meets the strongest benchmark and the supplier lists multiple customization options, it is likely suitable for buyers requiring flexible product adaptation. The score is not the absolute maximum because detailed evidence of customization execution, technical support depth, or service process control is not provided.

Final Score
9 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time dispatch rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate, which is the strongest delivery metric available in the provided data. This indicates that, based on platform-recorded performance, the supplier has met dispatch commitments reliably. However, the data does not include average production lead time, international logistics performance, delayed shipment history, order complexity, or whether the 100.0% rate is based on a large transaction sample.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring criteria, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for 9 to 10 points. A 100.0% rate supports the top score range. The score is set at the maximum because the provided delivery metric is clear and fully meets the highest performance threshold, although buyers should still confirm lead times for larger or customized orders.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 10+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Supplier marked as verified, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a strong store rating of 4.9, which is positive from a customer feedback perspective. However, the number of reviews is only 10+, meaning the rating is based on a relatively limited feedback pool. The supplier is marked as verified, which supports basic credibility, but the provided data does not confirm whether Finished Product Inspection is available. It also does not provide detailed quality control documentation, inspection procedures, product testing standards, warranty terms, defect rate, or third-party inspection records.

Scoring Rationale
The high store rating supports confidence in buyer satisfaction, but the limited review count prevents a higher score. Quality assurance evidence is incomplete because Finished Product Inspection is not confirmed, and the factory verification details are not specified beyond the verified supplier status. As a result, the supplier shows positive but not fully substantiated quality performance. The score reflects good early customer feedback with insufficient quality system transparency.

Final Score
14 / 20

Total Score

78 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled order scaling. Wuxi Yongtai Building Sealing Materials Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers sourcing waterproof coatings, epoxy floor coatings, polyurethane roof paint, and related building sealing materials, especially when fast communication, Trade Assurance protection, and customization support are important.

The supplier is most appropriate for small-to-medium buyers, project-based purchasers, trial orders, and buyers who need responsive sourcing support with moderate transaction risk. For large-volume procurement or technically demanding projects, buyers should request additional documentation before committing to scale.

Main risk points include limited review volume, only 2 years of Gold Supplier history, insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, insufficient detail on factory verification scope, and lack of disclosed production capacity or quality certification information.

Growth potential is present due to the supplier’s verified status, 9,400+ sqm factory area, strong 100.0% on-time dispatch rate, ≤1h response time, customization labels, and active six-month order history. A prudent procurement approach would be to begin with samples or a small trial order, verify product quality and consistency, then gradually increase order volume based on delivery, inspection results, and after-sales responsiveness.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Langfang Yuelai Sealing Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Langfang Yuelai Sealing Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Bafangle New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Bafangle New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Shengtao Metal Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Shengtao Metal Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yueling Building Materials Limited Supplier Evaluation
Yueling Building Materials Limited Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Shengye Tebang New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Shengye Tebang New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kst Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kst Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
C-Cure Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
C-Cure Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Taiyan Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Taiyan Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Renqiu Tuoxin Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Renqiu Tuoxin Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gomix (Guangdong) Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gomix (Guangdong) Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Oscar Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Oscar Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Prestressed Building Materials Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Prestressed Building Materials Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Guansu Building Materials Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Guansu Building Materials Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Qiaochen Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Qiaochen Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Binzhou Chengli Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Binzhou Chengli Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Hengchi Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Hengchi Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Meifei Building Materials (Hebei) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Meifei Building Materials (Hebei) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Bepro Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Bepro Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Singer Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Singer Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Prologade Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Prologade Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shijaizhuang Chenxing Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijaizhuang Chenxing Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huzhou Xingxing Abrasive Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huzhou Xingxing Abrasive Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yueyang Dongting Sealing Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yueyang Dongting Sealing Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Xinrou Aviation Supplies Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Xinrou Aviation Supplies Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Elsky Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Elsky Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Novi Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Novi Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Dongke Aluminum Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Dongke Aluminum Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Lezet Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Lezet Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Enjoy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Enjoy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Guibang Decorative Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Guibang Decorative Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Dmais Electrical And Mechanical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shunde Dmais Electrical And Mechanical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Yilong Network Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Yilong Network Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Shinechef Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Shinechef Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Xinhuilun Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Xinhuilun Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Junuo Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Junuo Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Zoetic Outdoor Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Zoetic Outdoor Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Botou Tianjian Measuring Tool Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Botou Tianjian Measuring Tool Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Qishen Plastic Industry Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Qishen Plastic Industry Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jixiang Building Materials Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jixiang Building Materials Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Xiangma Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Xiangma Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026