zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Yiwu Hengyao Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Yiwu Hengyao Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd.

Yiwu Hengyao Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Yiwu Hengyao Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. is a Zhejiang-based Chinese supplier offering electric personal grooming products, including portable hair cutting machines, women’s electric trimmers, rechargeable shaving kits, and multi-function hair removal devices. Based on the provided data, the company operates with a factory area of over 3,500㎡ and more than 100 staff, indicating a mid-sized production setup with basic supply stability. The supplier is listed as a Gold Supplier for 1 year and supports Trade Assurance, with platform tags showing an on-time delivery rate of 83.9% and response time within 6 hours. Its recent business performance shows 300+ orders and CN¥270.4K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.1 store rating and 80+ reviews. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking small to medium-volume sourcing, low MOQ flexibility, and cost-sensitive grooming appliance products. However, limited Gold Supplier history, moderate rating level, and insufficient data on product inspection and customization require cautious evaluation.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company name: Yiwu Hengyao Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Zhejiang, China
  • Factory area: 3,500+㎡
  • Employees: 100+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Product scope includes electric grooming and hair removal appliances.

Elaboration

The supplier has a factory area exceeding 3,500㎡ and more than 100 employees, which indicates a mid-sized manufacturing or supply operation rather than a very small trading setup. The presence of a verified supplier status provides a certain level of credibility regarding company existence and operational capability. The listed product portfolio is focused on electric personal care and grooming devices, suggesting some category specialization within small electrical appliances.

However, the provided data does not include detailed production capacity, number of production lines, monthly output, equipment information, R&D team size, quality laboratory capability, or major factory audit certificates. Therefore, while the company demonstrates basic and stable production scale, there is insufficient evidence to classify it as a large-scale or highly mature supply chain.

Scoring Rationale

A factory size of 3,500+㎡ and 100+ employees fits the profile of a medium-sized supplier with basic manufacturing capacity. The verified supplier status strengthens its credibility, but the lack of detailed audit reports, factory certifications, production capacity data, or advanced manufacturing indicators limits the score. The supplier appears stable enough for regular procurement, but not sufficiently documented to be rated as a large-scale, highly established supply chain.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Certification / industry tags:
  • On-time delivery: 83.9%
  • Response time: ≤6h
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has core platform credibility elements, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These are positive signals for platform-based procurement because they provide a certain level of transaction protection and supplier identity verification.

However, the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, which means the supplier has a relatively short platform track record. The provided certification or industry tags are limited to delivery and response performance indicators. There is no provided evidence of additional compliance certifications, product certifications, factory audit reports, safety certifications, social compliance audits, or international market compliance documentation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the essential platform credibility elements: Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. These support a moderate level of purchasing confidence. Nevertheless, the short Gold Supplier duration and lack of comprehensive certification data prevent a higher score. The platform credibility is acceptable for initial cooperation, but not yet strong enough to be considered a long-established and fully documented supplier.

Final Score

15 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 300+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥270.4K+
  • Store rating: 4.1
  • Number of reviews: 80+

Elaboration

The supplier has achieved more than 300 orders over the past six months, which indicates active commercial operation and market demand. The transaction amount of CN¥270.4K+ shows measurable business activity, though it does not indicate a very large transaction scale. The review count of 80+ provides some customer feedback base, but it is not extensive. The store rating of 4.1 is acceptable but not particularly high, suggesting that buyer satisfaction is moderate rather than excellent.

The supplier’s business activity appears suitable for small to medium-scale procurement. The relatively low MOQs shown in the product data, ranging from 1 piece to 100 pieces depending on product type, may also support sample orders or small-batch trial purchases. However, based strictly on the provided data, there is insufficient evidence of large-volume repeat buyers, major clients, export markets, or strong category leadership.

Scoring Rationale

The 300+ recent orders demonstrate stable transaction activity, while CN¥270.4K+ in six-month transaction value supports a moderate commercial base. However, the store rating of 4.1 is not high enough to indicate outstanding customer satisfaction, and the review quantity is moderate. The supplier is commercially validated, but the data does not support classification as a high-volume, high-reputation seller.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤6h
  • Platform tag: Response time ≤6h
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 6 hours indicates a reasonable communication standard for online B2B sourcing. This response speed should be acceptable for general inquiries, sample discussions, order confirmation, and basic procurement communication.

However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM, ODM, private labeling, packaging customization, design modification, or technical customization. Since customization capability is a key service factor, the lack of evidence limits the assessment. The supplier can be considered responsive, but its ability to handle customized projects cannot be confirmed from the available data.

Scoring Rationale

A response time of ≤6 hours supports a normal to good service level, but it does not reach the strongest level defined by response within 1 hour. In addition, customization capability is marked as Insufficient Data, which prevents a higher score. The supplier appears suitable for standard product inquiries and general purchasing communication, but buyers requiring customized product development should verify capabilities before placing orders.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 83.9%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 83.9%, which falls within the 80%–89% scoring range. This indicates generally acceptable delivery performance, but it also suggests that a noticeable portion of orders may not be shipped on time. For buyers with strict delivery schedules, seasonal sales windows, or marketplace replenishment requirements, this performance level requires attention.

The data does not include average lead time, production cycle, shipping method, peak season performance, inventory availability, or delay reasons. Therefore, delivery reliability can only be assessed based on the provided on-time delivery percentage.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% merits 7 to 8 points. At 83.9%, the supplier is within the middle of this range. The delivery performance is acceptable but not excellent. Buyers should confirm lead times, production schedules, and shipment deadlines before placing larger orders.

Final Score

8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.1
  • Review count: 80+
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification report is not provided.

Elaboration

The supplier has a store rating of 4.1 and 80+ reviews, which provides a basic customer feedback foundation. The rating level is acceptable but not high enough to indicate consistently excellent buyer satisfaction. The review count is also moderate, meaning the available customer feedback is useful but not extensive.

The supplier is marked as a verified supplier, which contributes positively to supplier credibility. However, there is no provided data confirming Finished Product Inspection, quality control process, defect rate, inspection reports, product testing standards, warranty handling, or product compliance certifications. Since the products are electric grooming appliances, quality control and safety compliance would be important procurement considerations, but such information is not available in the provided dataset.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has basic quality-related credibility through store feedback and verified supplier status. However, the 4.1 rating is moderate, not excellent, and the review count is limited to 80+. Most importantly, there is insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection and detailed quality assurance systems. This supports a fair but cautious score, reflecting basic quality validation without strong evidence of a comprehensive inspection framework.

Final Score

14 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 15 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 15 / 20
Business Performance 15 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 8 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 14 / 20
Total Score 74 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Yiwu Hengyao Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking small to medium-volume sourcing of electric grooming and personal care appliances, especially those requiring low MOQ options and basic platform transaction protection through Trade Assurance. The supplier shows reasonable company scale, verified supplier status, active recent transactions, and acceptable delivery performance.

Suitable customer types:
- Small and medium importers
- E-commerce sellers testing personal care appliance products
- Buyers requiring low MOQ trial orders
- Cost-sensitive distributors seeking basic grooming appliance products
- Buyers comfortable with platform-based supplier management

Main risks:
- Gold Supplier history is only 1 year.
- Store rating of 4.1 is moderate rather than strong.
- On-time delivery rate of 83.9% is acceptable but not high.
- Insufficient Data on Full Customization capability.
- Insufficient Data on Finished Product Inspection, product compliance, and detailed quality control systems.

Growth potential:
The supplier has a mid-sized operational base, 300+ recent orders, and a focused product category in electric grooming appliances. If it improves delivery consistency, strengthens quality documentation, and provides clearer customization and inspection capabilities, it may become more suitable for larger or longer-term procurement programs. For now, buyers should begin with sample testing or small-batch trial orders before scaling procurement volume.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Yiwu Binge Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Binge Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nvision Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nvision Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Jinmin Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Jinmin Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Suoke Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Suoke Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Mingge Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Mingge Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Hengbo Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Hengbo Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Dingfeng Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Dingfeng Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Jiayu Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Jiayu Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Yachen Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Yachen Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sutai Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sutai Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhanjiang Shile Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhanjiang Shile Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Jieweishi Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Jieweishi Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Epers Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Epers Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Sylon Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Sylon Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Yuanming Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Yuanming Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Haifei Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Haifei Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Zhenmei Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Zhenmei Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lvesta (Zhanjiang) Electrical  Appliance   Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lvesta (Zhanjiang) Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lianjiang Ricco Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lianjiang Ricco Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Ouyou Electrical Appliance Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Ouyou Electrical Appliance Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Leiteng (Guangzhou) Iot Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Leiteng (Guangzhou) Iot Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yipomson Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yipomson Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Guanwei Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Guanwei Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou C&L Auto Accessories Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou C&L Auto Accessories Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Changsha Renji Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changsha Renji Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Lanparte Television Equipment Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Lanparte Television Equipment Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Saao Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Saao Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Aurora Sound Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Aurora Sound Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Oufei'Er Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Oufei'Er Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Xinchaoyue Heavy Industry Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Xinchaoyue Heavy Industry Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Moon Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Moon Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Global Power Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Global Power Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Funeng Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Funeng Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Solarwool Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Solarwool Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Lifang Amusement Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Lifang Amusement Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Arctic Point Cold Chain Technology (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Arctic Point Cold Chain Technology (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Jinqianquan Electromechanical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Jinqianquan Electromechanical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Chuanghui Foodstuffs Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Chuanghui Foodstuffs Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Chengdu Yibai Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengdu Yibai Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Jinbao Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Jinbao Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026