zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shijiazhuang Longgong Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shijiazhuang Longgong Plastic Products Co., Ltd. is a Hebei, China-based supplier with a reported factory area of over 18,000㎡ and more than 140 staff, indicating a medium-scale manufacturing base with established production capacity. The supplier shows strong platform credibility, supported by 18 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, verified supplier status, and platform tags including low MOQ for customization, response time within 2 hours, and 100% on-time delivery. Its listed products are mainly electrical tape-related items, including PVC electrical tape and self-amalgamating voltage-resistant products, with relatively high MOQs across several listings. However, business performance data is weak, with only 2 orders and CN¥405.6+ transaction value in the past six months, no store rating provided, and 0 reviews. This supplier appears suitable for buyers prioritizing platform credibility, production base stability, and delivery reliability, but it requires cautious validation due to limited recent transaction and customer feedback data.

Shijiazhuang Longgong Plastic Products Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Factory location: Hebei, China
  • Factory area: 18,000+㎡
  • Employees: 140+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Product listings indicate electrical tape-related products with MOQs ranging from 2,000 pieces to 50,000 rolls.

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported factory size exceeding 18,000㎡, which suggests a relatively solid physical manufacturing base. A workforce of more than 140 staff indicates that the company is not a micro-scale operation and likely has structured production, warehousing, sales, and operational functions. The presence of multiple product listings with large MOQs, especially 20,000–50,000 rolls for several tape products, also indicates that the supplier is positioned toward bulk supply rather than small trial orders.

However, the provided data does not include detailed production capacity, number of production lines, annual output, equipment list, export markets, or specific factory certifications beyond verified supplier status. Therefore, while the company demonstrates stable basic manufacturing strength, the absence of deeper production and certification details prevents it from being rated as a top-tier large-scale supplier.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier fits the profile of a medium-sized stable factory: it has a sizeable facility, a meaningful employee base, and verified supplier status. These factors support a positive assessment of operational stability. However, because there is no disclosed data on production volume, factory audit reports, ISO certifications, equipment scale, or historical export capacity, the assessment should remain conservative. The company is stronger than a small basic manufacturer but does not have enough disclosed evidence to qualify as a fully large-scale, highly documented supply chain operator.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 18 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Platform / industry tags:
  • Low MOQ for customization
  • Response time ≤2h
  • On-time delivery 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier has a very long Gold Supplier history of 18 years, which is a significant platform credibility indicator. Long-term platform presence generally supports supplier continuity and reduces the risk of dealing with a newly established or unverified storefront. Trade Assurance availability is also positive because it provides buyers with platform-backed transactional protection. Verified supplier status further strengthens basic compliance credibility.

The supplier also carries platform tags related to customization, response speed, and delivery performance. These tags are useful, but they are not equivalent to internationally recognized certifications or formal factory management system approvals. No external certifications such as ISO, product compliance certificates, or third-party audit documents are provided in the dataset.

Scoring Rationale

This dimension is one of the supplier’s strongest areas. An 18-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status together represent a strong platform-based trust profile. The main limitation is that the data does not provide detailed certification documents or broader compliance evidence beyond -related indicators. Therefore, the supplier deserves a high score, though not a perfect one due to incomplete certification depth.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 2
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥405.6+
  • Store rating: Insufficient Data
  • Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration

The recent transaction data is very limited. Only 2 orders were recorded in the past six months, and the transaction amount is CN¥405.6+, which is low relative to the supplier’s listed MOQs and apparent bulk-supply positioning. This creates a mismatch between the supplier’s production scale/platform credibility and its recent visible commercial performance.

The absence of a store rating and the presence of 0 reviews further limit commercial validation. Without customer ratings, review details, repeat buyer data, or larger recent order history, it is difficult to confirm market acceptance, buyer satisfaction, or consistency of commercial execution based on the provided data alone.

Scoring Rationale

Although the supplier has strong platform tenure, business performance must be judged strictly by recent measurable transaction data. The very low order count, low disclosed transaction amount, missing store rating, and zero reviews indicate weak recent commercial verification. This does not necessarily mean the supplier lacks capability, but based on the available data, the business performance evidence is insufficient and below average.

Final Score

8 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤2h
  • Platform tag: Low MOQ for customization
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 2 hours is positive and suggests acceptable communication efficiency. This is suitable for buyers who require reasonably quick quotation follow-up, sample discussions, or order coordination. The platform tag “Low MOQ for customization” suggests some customization support, but the dataset does not explicitly confirm “Full Customization.” Therefore, customization capability should be considered present at a basic or limited level rather than advanced.

No additional service-related information is provided, such as multilingual support, engineering support, design assistance, sample lead time, after-sales process, or dedicated account management. As a result, the service capability assessment must remain moderate.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs well on response speed but does not meet the highest service benchmark of response time ≤1 hour combined with clearly confirmed strong customization capability. Since only low-MOQ customization is mentioned and Full Customization is not confirmed, the score should reflect a normal but not exceptional service level.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The reported on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, which is excellent according to the provided scoring framework. This indicates that, for the recorded platform delivery data, the supplier has met shipment timing expectations. Delivery reliability is particularly important for bulk procurement of electrical tape-related products because delays can affect downstream production, resale schedules, and inventory planning.

However, the number of recent orders is only 2, so the 100% on-time rate is based on a limited recent transaction sample. While the metric itself is strong, buyers should still verify lead times and production scheduling for larger orders.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier reports 100.0%, it merits the maximum score within this dimension. The limited order sample is noted as a risk factor but does not reduce the score under the stated delivery-performance criteria.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: Insufficient Data
  • Number of reviews: 0
  • Verified supplier / factory verification: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Product category: Electrical tape-related products listed, including PVC electrical tape and voltage-resistant self-amalgamating product listings.

Elaboration

Quality and customer feedback data is limited. The supplier has verified supplier status, which provides some baseline confidence that the company has undergone a platform-level verification process. However, there is no store rating, no customer reviews, and no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection. For product categories related to electrical insulation or automotive/electrical applications, buyers typically need clear quality control data, product test reports, or inspection procedures. None of these are included in the provided dataset.

The absence of customer feedback is a significant limitation because it prevents assessment of product consistency, complaint history, packaging quality, communication quality, and post-delivery satisfaction. While factory verification is a positive factor, it is not enough to fully validate product quality performance.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has some basic quality credibility through verified supplier status, but the lack of rating, reviews, and finished product inspection evidence makes quality validation weak. The score is therefore below the mid-level threshold. It should not be rated extremely low because verification exists, but the absence of customer feedback and quality-system data creates a notable procurement risk.

Final Score

9 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 16 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 8 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 9 / 20
Total Score 69 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Shijiazhuang Longgong Plastic Products Co., Ltd. can be considered for cooperation, especially for buyers seeking a supplier with a stable manufacturing base, long platform history, Trade Assurance support, and strong reported delivery performance. The company appears more suitable for bulk buyers, distributors, or procurement teams sourcing electrical tape-related products with relatively high MOQ requirements.

However, cooperation should proceed cautiously due to weak recent business validation. The supplier has only 2 orders and CN¥405.6+ transaction value in the past six months, no visible store rating, and 0 reviews. Quality feedback is also insufficient, and there is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection or formal product/factory certifications beyond platform verification.

Main risks:
- Limited recent transaction history
- No customer reviews or store rating
- Insufficient disclosed quality inspection data
- No confirmed Full Customization capability
- Delivery performance is strong but based on limited order data

Growth potential:
The supplier has good structural potential due to its 18-year Gold Supplier status, verified supplier profile, factory scale, and 100% on-time delivery rate. If future data shows stronger order volume, customer reviews, and clearer quality control documentation, its procurement attractiveness could improve significantly.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shijiazhuang Huabang Mineral Products Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Huabang Mineral Products Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Juyuan Mineral Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Juyuan Mineral Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Jianliang Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Jianliang Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Xuang Mineral Products Processing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Xuang Mineral Products Processing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bestway Plastic And Metal Products Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bestway Plastic And Metal Products Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bailiheng Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bailiheng Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Botong Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Botong Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Haobike Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Haobike Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Jincang Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Jincang Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bazhou Shengjue Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bazhou Shengjue Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengshui Tuan Plastic Products Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hengshui Tuan Plastic Products Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Huanfu Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Huanfu Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jinshengfeng Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jinshengfeng Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Haoran Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Haoran Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Shuaibao Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Shuaibao Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Jiaxinqi Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Jiaxinqi Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Bahao Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Bahao Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Baihao Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Baihao Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lanzhou Jintudi Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lanzhou Jintudi Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Bolida Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Bolida Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shenzhen Jinhua Electronic Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jinhua Electronic Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Futian Huaqiang Electronic World Omk Electronic Sales Department Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Futian Huaqiang Electronic World Omk Electronic Sales Department Supplier Evaluation
Luoyang Hengchang Heavy Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luoyang Hengchang Heavy Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Chegongshe Hardware Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Chegongshe Hardware Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Rinhoo Jewelry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Rinhoo Jewelry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Link Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Link Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Bendin Industrial Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Bendin Industrial Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Ruitu Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Ruitu Automobile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Yite Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Yite Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Xinleichuang Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Xinleichuang Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Laizhou Huibang Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Laizhou Huibang Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Chelaiwang Automotive Parts Co., Ltd, Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Chelaiwang Automotive Parts Co., Ltd, Supplier Evaluation
Dezhou Success Tanks Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dezhou Success Tanks Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Shinelite Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Shinelite Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining Tovisen Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining Tovisen Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Yobest New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Yobest New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Moben New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Moben New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi An Green Source Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi An Green Source Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Botong Aluminum Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Botong Aluminum Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Jhr Smart Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Jhr Smart Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026