zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shanghai Moben New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shanghai Moben New Material Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shanghai, with a reported factory area of 17,000+ sqm and 100+ staff. The company focuses on smart glass, PDLC smart film, switchable privacy glass, holographic smart glass, and related power supply transformer products. Based on the provided data, the supplier demonstrates a solid production foundation, verified supplier status, Gold Supplier membership for 4 years, Trade Assurance support, and strong recent transaction performance, including 200+ orders and CN¥18.2M+ transaction value over the past six months. Its on-time delivery rate of 96.9% is a clear operational strength. However, the store rating of 4.1 and only 10+ reviews indicate that customer feedback depth is still limited. Information on full customization, finished product inspection, and formal factory certifications is insufficient. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking commercially active smart glass or PDLC film suppliers with moderate-to-strong production capacity and reliable delivery performance.

Shanghai Moben New Material Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Shanghai, China
- Factory area: 17,000+ sqm
- Employees: 100+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Product scope includes smart glass, PDLC smart film, switchable privacy glass, holographic smart glass, and transformer-related products.

Elaboration
The supplier has a relatively substantial physical production footprint, with a reported factory area exceeding 17,000 sqm. A workforce of 100+ staff indicates that the company is beyond a small trading-only operation and has a meaningful operational base. The presence of multiple related smart glass and PDLC film products suggests a focused product category rather than a highly scattered catalogue. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the company profile, although the provided data does not specify detailed factory audit reports, production line quantity, machinery scale, annual capacity, or formal manufacturing certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The company fits the profile of a medium-sized and relatively stable supplier. Its factory area and employee count support a solid production foundation, and verified supplier status strengthens confidence in its operating presence. However, the data does not confirm large-scale manufacturing capacity, advanced factory certifications, or detailed production infrastructure. Therefore, it should not be scored at the top “large-scale stable supply chain” level.

Final Score
17 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Platform labels: “Response time ≤4h”, “On-time delivery 96.9%”

Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform-level credibility indicators. A 4-year Gold Supplier history demonstrates a certain level of continuity on , while Trade Assurance provides buyers with a transactional protection mechanism. Verified supplier status further supports baseline credibility. The listed platform labels also show measurable service and delivery indicators. However, the provided data does not include detailed third-party certifications, factory audit documents, product compliance certificates, or complete industry certification labels.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has the core platform credibility elements expected from a reliable supplier: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and measurable operational labels. The 4-year Gold Supplier history is positive but not long enough to be considered a very long-term platform record. Since formal compliance certifications and complete certification details are not provided, the score remains below the highest range.

Final Score
17 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 200+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥18.2M+
- Store rating: 4.1
- Reviews: 10+

Elaboration
The supplier shows strong recent commercial activity. More than 200 orders and over CN¥18.2M in transaction value within six months indicate meaningful buyer demand and active sales conversion. This is a positive signal for procurement teams because it demonstrates that the supplier is not merely listed on the platform but has recent transaction momentum. However, the store rating of 4.1 is moderate rather than excellent, and the review count of 10+ is relatively limited compared with the order volume.

Scoring Rationale
The high order count and transaction value support a strong business performance score. These figures suggest that the supplier has been commercially validated by recent buyers. However, the rating and review base reduce the score because customer feedback volume is not deep enough to fully confirm consistency across many completed transactions. The supplier performs well commercially, but the customer feedback profile prevents a top-tier score.

Final Score
16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤4h
- Platform label: “Response time ≤4h”
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s stated response time of within 4 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for international procurement interactions. This response level is useful for quotation clarification, technical confirmation, order coordination, and after-sales communication. However, there is no provided evidence confirming Full Customization capability, engineering support, design customization, sample development process, or dedicated project management services.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates normal-to-good responsiveness but does not meet the highest service benchmark of response time within 1 hour. In addition, customization capability is not confirmed in the provided data. Because service capability assessment depends not only on response speed but also on customization and communication depth, the score is placed in the middle range.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 96.9%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 96.9% is a strong operational indicator. For procurement buyers, especially those managing project-based glass, film, or construction-related material timelines, reliable delivery performance is critical. A rate above 90% falls into the strongest scoring band under the required evaluation framework.

Scoring Rationale
The provided on-time delivery rate clearly exceeds the 90% threshold for the highest delivery performance range. Since the figure is specific and platform-labeled, it provides a strong basis for scoring. No negative delivery data is provided.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.1
- Reviews: 10+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Supplier verification provided as True, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a moderate store rating of 4.1 and a limited review base of 10+ reviews. While the verified supplier status provides some confidence in the company’s legitimacy, the available quality-related data is not comprehensive. There is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, quality management certifications, testing standards, defect rate, inspection workflow, or detailed third-party factory verification report. For smart glass and PDLC film products, quality consistency, electrical performance, optical clarity, and installation reliability are important, but these aspects cannot be confirmed from the supplied data.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has some positive quality signals through verified supplier status and a visible store rating, but the rating is not high enough to support a premium quality score. The review count is also relatively low, limiting confidence in long-term customer satisfaction. Because Finished Product Inspection and detailed quality assurance systems are not provided, the score remains in the lower-middle range rather than the strong quality range.

Final Score
13 / 20

Total Score

80 / 100

  • Company Strength: 17 / 20
  • Platform & Compliance Credibility: 17 / 20
  • Business Performance: 16 / 20
  • Service Capability: 7 / 10
  • Delivery Performance: 10 / 10
  • Quality & Customer Feedback: 13 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled qualification steps. Shanghai Moben New Material Technology Co., Ltd. shows solid supplier fundamentals, strong recent transaction activity, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and excellent on-time delivery performance. It is suitable for buyers seeking smart glass, PDLC smart film, switchable privacy glass, or related products from a commercially active medium-sized supplier.

The supplier is especially suitable for small to mid-sized procurement projects, sample-based sourcing, repeat commercial orders, and buyers who value delivery reliability. For large-scale, high-specification, or technically sensitive projects, further verification is necessary before mass procurement.

Key risks include limited customer review volume, moderate store rating, insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, insufficient data on Full Customization, and lack of detailed factory certification or product compliance information. Its growth potential appears positive based on recent transaction value, order volume, and delivery performance, but quality assurance documentation should be requested before placing large or long-term orders.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shanghai Sturdyarmor New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sturdyarmor New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Nailite New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Nailite New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Flying New Material Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Flying New Material Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Tongyizhong New Material Technology Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Tongyizhong New Material Technology Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Renren Jiabei New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Renren Jiabei New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Jinlong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Jinlong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Yinwang New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Yinwang New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Chuangxin New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Chuangxin New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Marlboro New Material Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Marlboro New Material Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Aorunde New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Aorunde New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Vnovo New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Vnovo New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Baolijia New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Baolijia New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Longyi New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Longyi New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Misource New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Misource New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Gmark New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Gmark New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Emf New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Emf New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yijin New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yijin New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Eheng New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Eheng New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Hdmann Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Hdmann Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Aupcon Medical Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Aupcon Medical Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanchang Hongzhou Agricultural Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Nanchang Hongzhou Agricultural Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hengxin Thread Factory Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hengxin Thread Factory Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Realkey Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Realkey Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Lunneng Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Lunneng Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Sanying Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Sanying Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Rambo Auto Parts Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Rambo Auto Parts Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Yaolong Metal Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Yaolong Metal Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Benhao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Benhao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Julu Xinhua Sealing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Julu Xinhua Sealing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Haokun Heavy Industry Machinery Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Haokun Heavy Industry Machinery Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Chuangxing Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Chuangxing Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anqing Clean Dental Instrument Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anqing Clean Dental Instrument Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Unique New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Unique New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Hualv Alu-Formwork Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Hualv Alu-Formwork Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining Aide Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jining Aide Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fato Mechanical And Electrical Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Fato Mechanical And Electrical Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Xuwei Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Xuwei Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangyin Xinming Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangyin Xinming Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qixiang Electron Science & Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qixiang Electron Science & Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026