Anqing Clean Dental Instrument Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Anqing Clean Dental Instrument Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Anhui, offering disposable medical and dental-related consumables such as exam table paper couch rolls, disposable sterilization wraps, medical crepe paper, non-woven medical paper sheets, and sterile pouches. Based on the provided data, the company operates from a 6,200+㎡ facility with 40+ staff and is listed as a verified factory supplier, indicating a stable but not large-scale manufacturing base. Its profile shows relatively strong platform credibility, including 6 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and customization capability labels. Commercial performance is supported by 80+ orders and CN¥878.9K+ transaction value over the past six months, with a 4.9 store rating from 60+ reviews. The supplier appears suitable for small to medium-sized buyers seeking low-MOQ, customizable disposable medical packaging or dental consumable products. Key limitations include limited disclosed quality inspection details and insufficient data on product-specific certifications.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Company: Anqing Clean Dental Instrument Technology Co., Ltd.
• Country/Region: China, Anhui Province
• Factory area: 6,200+㎡
• Employees: 40+ staff
• Verified factory supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a clearly stated physical manufacturing base with a factory area exceeding 6,200㎡. This indicates a tangible production site rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. The staff size of 40+ suggests a small-to-medium operational team, which may be sufficient for focused production of disposable medical and dental consumable categories, but does not indicate a large-scale industrial workforce.

The presence of a verified factory supplier status strengthens the company’s credibility from a procurement perspective, as it provides some level of platform-backed confirmation regarding the supplier’s manufacturing identity. However, no additional data is provided regarding production lines, monthly capacity, automation level, factory audit reports, or internationally recognized factory certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates a stable manufacturing foundation with a moderate factory area and verified supplier status. However, the employee count remains relatively modest, and there is insufficient data on production capacity, equipment scale, or formal factory management certifications. Therefore, it fits best within the “medium stable factory” range, but not at the upper end of large-scale supply-chain capability.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 6 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified factory supplier: True
• Certification / industry tags: “Low MOQ for customization”, “Full customization”, “Minor customization”

Elaboration

The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 6 years, which provides a meaningful record of platform presence. Trade Assurance support adds an important transaction-protection mechanism for buyers, especially for new sourcing relationships. The verified factory supplier status further supports the credibility of the supplier’s operational identity.

The listed platform tags indicate customization capabilities, including low-MOQ customization, full customization, and minor customization. These are useful commercial capability indicators but should not be treated as product certifications. No data is provided regarding ISO, CE, FDA, MDR, or other medical product compliance certifications. Therefore, compliance credibility is strong at the platform level, but product-level regulatory compliance remains Insufficient Data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has strong platform credibility due to 6 years of Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance availability, and verified factory status. These elements provide a relatively complete platform-backed trust structure. However, because the provided certification labels are customization-related rather than formal medical or quality-management certifications, the score should not reach the maximum level.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 80+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥878.9K+
• Store rating: 4.9
• Reviews: 60+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded over 80 orders in the past six months, showing active commercial operations on the platform. The transaction value of CN¥878.9K+ indicates measurable sales traction, though it does not suggest very large-scale transaction volume. The store rating of 4.9 is strong, and the review count of 60+ provides a reasonable amount of buyer feedback, though it is not a very large review base.

From a procurement standpoint, this performance suggests that the supplier has passed basic market validation and is actively transacting with buyers. The data supports a view of steady business activity rather than early-stage or unproven operations.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 80+ recent orders, nearly CN¥879K in six-month transaction value, a high 4.9 rating, and 60+ reviews indicates stable medium-level commercial performance. However, the available figures do not demonstrate very high order volume or exceptionally large transaction scale. Therefore, the supplier fits within the stable mid-range performance band.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤1 hour
• Customization tags: “Low MOQ for customization”, “Full customization”, “Minor customization”

Elaboration

The supplier’s stated response time of within one hour is a strong service indicator, especially for international buyers who require quick confirmation on quotations, specifications, samples, and delivery schedules. The presence of full customization, minor customization, and low-MOQ customization tags suggests flexibility in handling different buyer requirements.

However, the provided data does not include details on languages supported, engineering support, design assistance, sample lead time, after-sales service, or dedicated account management. These areas remain Insufficient Data.

Scoring Rationale

The response time meets the highest service-performance threshold, and the supplier is marked as supporting full customization. This combination supports a high service score. The score is not reduced significantly because the two most important available indicators—fast response and customization support—are both positive.

Final Score

10 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 96.3%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 96.3% is strong. For procurement teams, this indicates that the supplier has demonstrated reliable shipment execution on the platform. A delivery rate above 90% generally supports confidence in order fulfillment and scheduling reliability.

No additional data is provided on average lead time, production cycle, logistics methods, peak-season capacity, or historical delay reasons. These areas are therefore Insufficient Data.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. At 96.3%, the supplier performs well above the required threshold and shows strong delivery reliability based on the available platform data.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.9
• Reviews: 60+
• Verified factory supplier: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: True

Elaboration

The supplier’s 4.9 store rating indicates positive customer satisfaction based on available platform feedback. The 60+ reviews provide a moderate feedback base, enough to support basic quality confidence but not enough to be considered extensive buyer validation. Factory verification strengthens trust by confirming the supplier’s manufacturing status.

However, there is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, quality control workflow, inspection reports, defect rates, product test reports, or product-specific certifications. Given that the listed products relate to medical and dental disposable consumables, the absence of disclosed quality and compliance documentation is a notable procurement risk and should be verified before bulk purchasing.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a high rating and a reasonable number of reviews, supported by factory verification. This indicates generally positive customer feedback and basic quality credibility. However, the lack of disclosed Finished Product Inspection data and absence of product-level certification information prevent it from being scored in the highest quality band.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Anqing Clean Dental Instrument Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking disposable medical or dental consumable products with low MOQ and customization requirements. The supplier shows strong platform credibility, fast response capability, good delivery performance, and stable recent transaction activity. It is especially suitable for small to medium-sized importers, dental supply distributors, medical consumable wholesalers, and buyers testing customized packaging or disposable paper-based medical products.

Main risk points:
1. Product certification data is insufficient. No ISO, CE, FDA, MDR, or equivalent product compliance information is provided.
2. Finished Product Inspection status is insufficient data. Buyers should request inspection procedures, QC reports, or third-party inspection options.
3. Production capacity details are limited. Factory area and staff count are available, but monthly output, production lines, and equipment details are not provided.
4. Review base is moderate, not extensive. 60+ reviews support basic confidence but do not represent large-scale customer validation.

Suggested procurement approach:
Start with sample orders or small trial orders under Trade Assurance. Before placing larger-volume orders, request product specifications, compliance documents, quality inspection records, packaging details, and confirmation of lead time. If documentation and sample quality meet buyer requirements, the supplier has good potential to become a stable mid-sized sourcing partner.