Anyang Yingpai Dental Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Anyang Yingpai Dental Material Co., Ltd. is a China-based dental material and dental equipment supplier located in Henan, with a reported factory area of 5,000+㎡ and 80+ staff. The company shows a relatively mature platform profile, supported by 14 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, verified supplier status, finished product inspection, and an on-time delivery rate of 90.7%. Its listed product range covers dental resin raw materials, portable dental X-ray equipment with sensor, stainless steel dental wax carver tools, dental lab consumables, and dental material sets, with low MOQs across several items. Commercial performance is solid, with 200+ orders and CN¥3.3M+ transaction value in the past six months, plus a 4.6 store rating from 70+ reviews. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for dental distributors, dental laboratories, and buyers seeking flexible MOQ procurement. Key limitations include limited disclosed factory certification details and a response time of up to 7 hours rather than rapid-response service.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Factory location: Henan, China
• Factory area: 5,000+㎡
• Employees: 80+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory-audited supplier: True
• Product scope includes dental raw materials, dental tools, dental lab consumables, and dental equipment.

Elaboration

The company demonstrates a defined physical operating base with over 5,000㎡ of factory space and more than 80 employees. This indicates that the supplier is not a purely trading-only storefront based on the provided information, and it has a basic-to-medium level of operational infrastructure. The presence of a verified supplier status further strengthens confidence in its physical and organizational legitimacy.

However, the provided data does not include detailed production line capacity, monthly output, machinery lists, quality management certificates, or specific factory audit reports. Therefore, while the company shows credible manufacturing or supply capability, the scale should be assessed as medium rather than large.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has measurable factory size, staff count, and verified supplier status, which supports a stable production and supply foundation. A 5,000+㎡ facility and 80+ staff place it above a small workshop level, but the lack of detailed capacity data and formal factory certification information prevents it from being classified as a large-scale, highly transparent supply chain operation.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 14 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Platform / industry tags include:
• Response time ≤7h
• ODM service available
• Finished product inspection
• On-time delivery 90.7%

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform history, with 14 years as a Gold Supplier. This is a significant credibility indicator within the ecosystem, especially when combined with Trade Assurance and verified supplier status. Trade Assurance provides buyers with an additional transaction protection mechanism, while the verified supplier status improves confidence in the legitimacy of the business profile.

The available tags also indicate operational transparency around inspection, delivery, response time, and ODM service. However, no specific international product certifications, dental industry regulatory certifications, or third-party quality system certificates are provided in the data. Therefore, compliance credibility is strong at the platform level, but product-level regulatory compliance cannot be confirmed.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance, and verification represents a mature and credible platform profile. The 14-year duration is especially positive. The score is not full because the provided data does not disclose detailed certification documents, certification bodies, medical/dental device compliance records, or complete audit documentation.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past six months: 200+
• Transaction value in the past six months: CN¥3.3M+
• Store rating: 4.6
• Review count: 70+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 200 orders and over CN¥3.3M in transaction value during the past six months, which indicates active commercial operations and a meaningful transaction base. This level of activity suggests that the supplier has existing buyer demand and operational experience in fulfilling orders through the platform.

The store rating of 4.6 is positive, though not at the highest possible level. The review count of 70+ provides some customer feedback visibility, but it is not a very large review base compared with highly mature, high-volume suppliers. Overall, the company shows stable and commercially validated performance, but not enough data to classify it as a top-tier high-volume supplier.

Scoring Rationale

The order volume and transaction value are solid for a six-month period, supporting a relatively strong business performance score. The 4.6 rating is favorable, and 70+ reviews provide a reasonable feedback sample. However, because the rating is not exceptionally high and the review base is moderate rather than extensive, the score is positioned below the top range.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤7h
• ODM service available
• No explicit data provided for Full Customization support.

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of up to 7 hours indicates acceptable communication capability, although it does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response within one hour. The availability of ODM service suggests that the supplier can support some level of product development or customization cooperation.

However, the data only confirms ODM service and does not specifically confirm Full Customization. Therefore, customization capability should be considered present but not fully verified at an advanced level. For buyers requiring standard products, low MOQ sourcing, or moderate customization, the supplier’s service capability appears sufficient. For buyers requiring highly responsive project management or complex customization, further confirmation would be needed.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier earns credit for ODM availability and a clearly stated response time. However, the response time is not rapid enough for the highest score band, and Full Customization is not confirmed in the provided data. This places the supplier in the normal-response, basic-to-moderate customization category.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 90.7%

Elaboration

The reported on-time delivery rate of 90.7% is above the 90% threshold, indicating generally reliable delivery performance. This is an important indicator for procurement planning, especially for buyers managing recurring orders or inventory replenishment cycles.

Although the on-time delivery rate is positive, it is only slightly above the 90% benchmark. The data does not include average lead time, late-shipment reasons, production scheduling capacity, or logistics method performance. Therefore, the supplier should be considered reliable but not without delivery monitoring needs.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. Since the figure is 90.7%, it meets the high-performance threshold but with limited margin. A score of 9 reflects strong but not exceptional delivery performance.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.6
• Review count: 70+
• Finished product inspection: Yes
• Verified supplier / factory-audited supplier: True
• No specific product certifications or quality management certificates provided.

Elaboration

The supplier has a favorable store rating of 4.6 and 70+ reviews, which provides a reasonable level of customer feedback visibility. The presence of finished product inspection is a positive quality-control indicator, suggesting that goods are checked before shipment or completion. Verified supplier status also contributes to confidence in the supplier’s operating profile.

However, quality assurance cannot be considered fully comprehensive based only on the available data. There is no disclosed information regarding ISO certification, dental product compliance certificates, inspection standards, defect rates, warranty terms, or third-party testing reports. This is particularly relevant because the listed product portfolio includes dental-related materials and equipment, where product quality and compliance can be critical depending on the buyer’s market.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates good customer feedback and has a finished product inspection mechanism, which supports a strong quality score. However, the review base is moderate rather than extensive, and the absence of disclosed formal quality certifications or product-level compliance documentation limits the score from reaching the highest range.

Final Score

17 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Anyang Yingpai Dental Material Co., Ltd. shows strong platform credibility, stable recent transaction activity, acceptable service capability, and good delivery performance. It is suitable for buyers sourcing dental materials, dental lab consumables, dental tools, and selected dental equipment with flexible MOQs. The supplier may be especially appropriate for small to medium-sized dental distributors, dental laboratories, and procurement teams seeking Trade Assurance-backed transactions.

Main risk points: - Insufficient Data on specific product certifications, especially for dental equipment or regulated dental materials.
- Insufficient Data on detailed production capacity, machinery, monthly output, and quality system certificates.
- Response time is ≤7h, which is acceptable but not highly responsive.
- Store rating is good at 4.6, but not top-tier, and the review base of 70+ is moderate.

Growth potential: The supplier has a long operating history, verified status, finished product inspection, and 200+ recent orders, indicating a solid commercial base. If it can provide more transparent certification documents, factory audit details, and product compliance evidence, it could become a stronger candidate for larger or more regulated procurement programs.