zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Anqing Decoration Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Anqing Decoration Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. is a China-based packaging materials supplier located in Anhui, with a reported factory area of over 8,500 m² and verified supplier status. The supplier offers plastic packaging products including PE, LDPE, HDPE, recyclable, and custom packaging bags, with MOQs ranging from 200 to 10,000 pieces based on the listed products. On , the company is a 3-year Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, and carries platform tags including low MOQ for customization, finished product inspection, and response time within one hour. Its recent business performance shows 200+ orders and CN¥473.2K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.7 store rating and 20+ reviews. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking plastic packaging products with flexible MOQ options, fast communication, and platform-backed transaction protection. Key limitations include missing employee count data and relatively limited review volume.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 8,500+ m²
- Employee count: Insufficient Data
- Factory location: Anhui, China
- Verified supplier: True
- Product scope provided: PE, LDPE, HDPE, recyclable and custom plastic packaging bags

Elaboration
The supplier has a clearly stated physical factory scale of more than 8,500 m², which indicates a meaningful production footprint for packaging materials. The listed product range suggests focus on plastic packaging bags across different materials and use cases, including recyclable and custom packaging formats. Verified supplier status provides additional support for the existence and legitimacy of the operation.

However, employee count is not provided, which limits the ability to fully assess labor capacity, production organization, and scalability. Without staff numbers, it is not possible to confirm whether the company has the workforce depth normally associated with larger-scale manufacturing.

Scoring Rationale
The factory area and verified supplier status support a positive assessment of company strength. The supplier appears stronger than a small or weakly documented factory because it has a sizeable facility and verified status. However, the absence of employee data prevents classification as a fully proven large-scale stable supply chain. The score is therefore placed in the upper-medium range rather than the top band.

Final Score: 16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 3 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / platform tags: Low MOQ for customization, Finished product inspection, Response time ≤1h

Elaboration
The supplier has several important credibility indicators. A 3-year Gold Supplier record shows some platform history, while Trade Assurance provides a transaction protection mechanism for buyers. Verified supplier status further strengthens platform credibility. The presence of finished product inspection as a platform tag adds a quality-related compliance signal.

The certification profile is useful but not fully comprehensive. No external management system certifications, product compliance certificates, or international audit standards are provided in the dataset. Therefore, the assessment must remain limited to platform credibility and the specific tags supplied.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has core platform safeguards: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and relevant operational tags. The 3-year Gold Supplier duration is credible but not long enough to justify the highest score range. Since the available compliance evidence is platform-based and lacks broader certification details, the supplier fits the “core certification complete but relatively shorter history” category.

Final Score: 16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past six months: 200+
- Transaction value in past six months: CN¥473.2K+
- Store rating: 4.7
- Review count: 20+

Elaboration
The supplier shows active commercial performance on the platform. More than 200 orders in the past six months indicates steady order activity, and CN¥473.2K+ in transaction value demonstrates that the supplier has converted platform traffic into actual sales. A 4.7 store rating is positive and suggests generally satisfactory buyer experience.

The review count of 20+ is useful but not large. This means buyer feedback exists, but the sample size is still relatively limited for making a highly robust judgment on long-term commercial reliability. The performance is stronger than a low-activity supplier but does not yet demonstrate very high transaction scale or extensive customer validation.

Scoring Rationale
The order count and transaction value support a stable mid-level business profile. The 4.7 rating is favorable, but the relatively limited review base prevents a top-tier score. Overall, the supplier shows real commercial traction and platform activity, but the evidence does not reach the level of high-volume, high-review, highly validated performance.

Final Score: 15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤1h
- Platform tag: Response time ≤1h
- Platform tag: Low MOQ for customization
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of one hour or less is a strong service indicator, especially for buyers who need fast quotation, sampling discussion, packaging specification confirmation, or order follow-up. The “Low MOQ for customization” tag suggests some customization flexibility, and the listed products include custom plastic packaging bags.

However, the dataset does not explicitly confirm “Full Customization.” Therefore, customization capability can only be assessed as present at a basic or flexible MOQ level, not as a confirmed full-service customization capability.

Scoring Rationale
The fast response time supports a high service score. The supplier also has evidence of customization-related capability through the low MOQ customization tag and listed custom packaging products. However, because Full Customization is not explicitly provided, the score should not reach the maximum band for strong confirmed customization capability.

Final Score: 8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time dispatch rate: 97.8%

Elaboration
The supplier’s reported on-time dispatch rate of 97.8% is a strong delivery performance indicator. This level is above the 90% threshold and suggests reliable order dispatch management based on the available platform data. For procurement teams, this is especially relevant when sourcing packaging materials that may be tied to production schedules, retail launches, or logistics planning.

No additional delivery metrics are provided, such as average lead time, sample lead time, late shipment rate by order type, or export logistics capability. Therefore, the evaluation is based only on the stated on-time dispatch rate.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring framework, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for 9 to 10 points. At 97.8%, the supplier is clearly within the strong delivery performance range. Since no broader delivery history or lead-time data is available, a high but not perfect score is appropriate.

Final Score: 9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.7
- Review count: 20+
- Finished product inspection: Present as platform tag
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided; separate Factory Verification details: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.7, which indicates generally favorable customer feedback. The presence of finished product inspection is a meaningful quality assurance indicator, showing that the supplier has at least some stated inspection process before shipment or completion. Verified supplier status further supports basic credibility.

The main limitation is the review count. With only 20+ reviews, the customer feedback base is not large enough to strongly validate consistency across many transactions. In addition, while verified supplier status is provided, no detailed factory verification report, audit scope, inspection standard, defect rate, or product compliance certificate is included in the data.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has a good rating and a stated finished product inspection mechanism, supporting a solid quality assessment. However, the relatively small review volume and lack of detailed quality certification or audit data prevent classification as a top-tier quality profile. The score reflects good but not fully comprehensive quality validation.

Final Score: 15 / 20

Total Score

79 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled order management. Anqing Decoration Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. appears suitable for small to medium-sized buyers, packaging distributors, e-commerce sellers, and brands seeking plastic packaging bags with flexible MOQ options, fast communication, Trade Assurance protection, and verified supplier status.

The supplier is especially suitable for buyers prioritizing recyclable or custom plastic packaging products within the listed product scope. Its strengths include a sizeable 8,500+ m² factory area, 97.8% on-time dispatch rate, 200+ recent orders, CN¥473.2K+ six-month transaction value, and response time within one hour.

Key risks include missing employee count, limited review volume, absence of explicit Full Customization confirmation, and lack of detailed third-party quality or factory audit documentation beyond the provided platform indicators. Growth potential is moderate to positive if the supplier can provide more transparent workforce data, stronger quality documentation, and broader customer feedback evidence.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Guangzhou Gorgeous Decoration Materials Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Gorgeous Decoration Materials Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Meisu Decoration Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Meisu Decoration Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Lusheng Decoration Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Lusheng Decoration Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Beauty East Decoration Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Beauty East Decoration Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yuehong Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yuehong Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fafaliang Packaging Materials (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fafaliang Packaging Materials (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yukang Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yukang Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anqing Changfan Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anqing Changfan Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anqing Clean Dental Instrument Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anqing Clean Dental Instrument Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Bestand Decoration Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Bestand Decoration Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Guanyi Light-Decoration Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Guanyi Light-Decoration Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shengyao Decoration Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shengyao Decoration Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Enze Decoration Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Enze Decoration Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Yiyuan Decoration Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Yiyuan Decoration Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Qianduomu Intelligent Decoration Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Qianduomu Intelligent Decoration Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huangshan Runyi Decoration Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huangshan Runyi Decoration Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hanzhong Xinda Decoration Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hanzhong Xinda Decoration Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Uogele Decoration Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Uogele Decoration Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Wanli Stone Decoration&Design Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Wanli Stone Decoration&Design Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Purly Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Purly Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Changzhou Taiqi Refrigeration Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Taiqi Refrigeration Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Qixiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Qixiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Wangiant Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Wangiant Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou World Imp & Exp Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou World Imp & Exp Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yancheng Lianggong Formwork Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yancheng Lianggong Formwork Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Feili Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Feili Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Liangyueliang Photoelectric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Liangyueliang Photoelectric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Acumen Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Acumen Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Meisite Daily Necessities Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Meisite Daily Necessities Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hong Yi Nonwovens Production Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hong Yi Nonwovens Production Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Chenglong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Chenglong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Adlone Kitchenware Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Adlone Kitchenware Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lincai Industry And Trade (Shaoxing) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lincai Industry And Trade (Shaoxing) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Unique New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Unique New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Longwell Machinery Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Longwell Machinery Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Jinlinen Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Jinlinen Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ugood Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ugood Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Better Silicone Rubber Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Better Silicone Rubber Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Ginari Gates Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Ginari Gates Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Wutai Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Wutai Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026