zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Guangdong Meisite Daily Necessities Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Guangdong Meisite Daily Necessities Co.,Ltd is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 45,000+㎡, 100+ staff, and audited supplier status. Its listed product portfolio focuses on stainless steel low-pressure pots, micro pressure cookers, and related home kitchenware products, with MOQs ranging from small trial quantities to 3,000-piece production-level orders. The supplier shows strong platform credibility through 16 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and compliance-related labels including Finished Product Inspection and warranty availability. Business activity is solid, with 600+ orders and CN¥743.7K+ transaction value in the past six months, supported by 200+ reviews and a 4.3 store rating. Delivery performance is particularly strong, with a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate. The main limitation is incomplete visibility on customization capability, as Full Customization is not specified. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking established kitchenware sourcing with verified platform credibility and reliable delivery.

Guangdong Meisite Daily Necessities Co.,Ltd

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company name: Guangdong Meisite Daily Necessities Co.,Ltd
  • Country/region: China, Guangdong
  • Factory area: 45,000+㎡
  • Employees: 100+ staff
  • Audited supplier: True
  • Product scope provided: stainless steel low-pressure pots, micro pressure cookers, multifunctional household kitchenware

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a relatively strong physical operating base, particularly through its reported 45,000+㎡ factory area. This indicates a sizeable production site compared with many small and mid-sized suppliers. The employee count of 100+ staff suggests an organized manufacturing operation, although the staffing scale is not exceptionally large relative to the factory area. The audited supplier status adds credibility to the existence and operational profile of the business.

The listed products are concentrated within kitchenware and cookware, especially stainless steel low-pressure pots and micro pressure cookers. This focused product scope suggests specialization within a defined category rather than a highly diversified general-trading model.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier qualifies as a strong manufacturing candidate due to its large reported factory area and audited supplier status. The 100+ staff count supports stable production capability but does not fully indicate a very large labor-intensive manufacturing scale. Therefore, the company fits between a medium-to-large stable factory and a large-scale supplier. The available data supports a high score, but not a perfect score because detailed production capacity, production lines, annual output, equipment list, or factory certification names are not provided.

Final Score

18 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 16 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Audited supplier: True
  • Certification / industry labels provided:
  • Socially responsible
  • OEM for well-known brands
  • Warranty available
  • Finished product inspection

Elaboration

The supplier has a long-standing Gold Supplier record of 16 years, which is a strong platform credibility indicator. Trade Assurance support also improves buyer protection by providing a transaction framework for online orders. The audited supplier status further supports credibility from a supplier verification perspective.

The provided labels are also commercially relevant. “Finished product inspection” is directly related to quality control visibility, while “Warranty available” supports after-sales confidence. “Socially responsible” and “OEM for well-known brands” are positive platform-level labels; however, the data does not provide names of brands, audit reports, certificate numbers, or third-party compliance documents.

Scoring Rationale

The platform credibility profile is strong because the supplier combines long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance, audited supplier status, and multiple compliance-related labels. A 16-year Gold Supplier history is particularly significant and supports a high trust level. The score is not set at the absolute maximum because the provided data does not include detailed factory audit reports, compliance certificate names, expiry dates, or independently verifiable documentation beyond the listed platform labels.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 600+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥743.7K+
  • Store rating: 4.3
  • Number of reviews: 200+

Elaboration

The supplier has meaningful recent commercial activity, with more than 600 orders over the past six months. This indicates that the store is actively transacting and has received repeated buyer engagement. The transaction value of CN¥743.7K+ confirms a measurable sales base, although it does not indicate extremely high-value industrial-scale trade.

The 4.3 store rating is acceptable but not outstanding. Combined with 200+ reviews, the rating has some statistical relevance and is not based on only a small number of buyers. The order volume is a positive signal, while the rating level suggests there may still be room for improvement in customer satisfaction, service consistency, product quality, or transaction experience.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows stable and proven business performance due to 600+ recent orders and CN¥743.7K+ transaction value. The review count is also sufficient to provide a meaningful market signal. However, the store rating of 4.3 is moderate rather than excellent, preventing the supplier from reaching the highest score band. The data supports a strong but not top-tier commercial validation score.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤6h
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data
  • Customization capability details: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s stated response time of within 6 hours indicates acceptable communication responsiveness for online sourcing. This is suitable for general RFQ handling, quotation follow-up, and order coordination. However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, private-label service, design development, packaging customization, or engineering-level product modification.

Although the product listings include multiple cookware items with different MOQs, this alone does not prove customization capability. Therefore, customization strength cannot be positively scored beyond the available evidence.

Scoring Rationale

The response time is reasonable but does not meet the strongest service standard of response within one hour. More importantly, Full Customization support is not specified, which limits the evaluation of service depth. The supplier can be considered service-capable for standard procurement inquiries, but there is insufficient data to confirm advanced customization support. A mid-range score is appropriate.

Final Score

6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time dispatch rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate, which is the strongest delivery metric provided in the dataset. This indicates that, based on the available platform data, the supplier has consistently dispatched orders within the committed time frame. For procurement teams, this is an important operational indicator, especially for buyers managing replenishment cycles, promotional timelines, or marketplace inventory planning.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. Since the supplier’s reported rate is 100.0%, it reaches the highest delivery performance band. No negative delivery-related data is provided. Therefore, the supplier receives the maximum score for this dimension.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.3
  • Reviews: 200+
  • Finished product inspection: Listed
  • Audited supplier: True
  • Warranty available: Listed
  • Factory Verification: Audited supplier status provided; separate detailed factory verification report is not provided

Elaboration

The supplier has a moderate-to-good store rating of 4.3 with more than 200 reviews. This review base is large enough to provide a meaningful indication of customer experience, though the rating is not at a premium level. The presence of a Finished Product Inspection label is a positive quality-control indicator, showing that final goods inspection is part of the supplier’s presented quality assurance profile.

The audited supplier status also contributes to quality credibility from a supplier verification perspective. In addition, the “Warranty available” label supports buyer confidence in after-sales handling. However, the data does not include detailed QC procedures, inspection standards, defect rates, product test reports, material certifications, or customer complaint breakdowns.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates a solid quality profile supported by Finished Product Inspection, audited supplier status, warranty availability, 200+ reviews, and a 4.3 rating. However, the store rating is good rather than excellent, and the dataset lacks deeper quality documentation such as inspection reports, certification files, test standards, or detailed factory verification records. This supports an above-average but not top-tier quality score.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 18 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 17 / 20
Service Capability 6 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 86 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, with qualification checks before large-volume customized orders.

Guangdong Meisite Daily Necessities Co.,Ltd is suitable for buyers sourcing stainless steel cookware, low-pressure pots, micro pressure cookers, and household kitchenware products. The supplier is especially appropriate for buyers who value established platform history, Trade Assurance coverage, audited supplier status, reliable dispatch performance, and moderate-to-high recent transaction activity.

Suitable customer types:
- Importers and distributors of household kitchenware
- E-commerce sellers requiring stable delivery performance
- Buyers seeking verified suppliers with Trade Assurance
- Buyers placing standard product orders or trial orders within the listed MOQ ranges

Main risks:
- Full Customization capability is not confirmed.
- Store rating of 4.3 is acceptable but not premium.
- Detailed factory audit reports, production capacity data, product testing documents, and QC process documents are not provided.
- Claims such as “OEM for well-known brands” are listed, but brand names or supporting documentation are not included.

Growth potential:
The supplier has strong platform maturity, sizable factory space, high on-time dispatch performance, and active recent order volume. If it can provide clearer customization capabilities, formal QC documentation, and more detailed factory verification materials, it could become a stronger candidate for larger or more customized procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Henan Kangzhimei Daily Chemical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Kangzhimei Daily Chemical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Dasheng Daily Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Dasheng Daily Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Zhengda Daily Use Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Zhengda Daily Use Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sheng Zhu Daily Pigments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sheng Zhu Daily Pigments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Potentech (Guangdong) Limited Supplier Evaluation
Potentech (Guangdong) Limited Supplier Evaluation
Frascio (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Frascio (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Mondax (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Mondax (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanpu Technology (Guangdong) Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanpu Technology (Guangdong) Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Liangjian Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Liangjian Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Kepu Kejea Co. , Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Kepu Kejea Co. , Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Cundao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Cundao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jushu Food Co.. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jushu Food Co.. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jiahao Marketing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jiahao Marketing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sunkings Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sunkings Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Kivon Power Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Kivon Power Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Hexu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Hexu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Aodiliya Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Aodiliya Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jiajianle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jiajianle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Kinocean Yacht Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Kinocean Yacht Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Svavo Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Svavo Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Zhejiang Tolerance Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Tolerance Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Booming Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Booming Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Yongshuo Heavy Industry Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Yongshuo Heavy Industry Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Tianyue Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Tianyue Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gongyi City Meiqi Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gongyi City Meiqi Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Everest Enclosure Tech Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Everest Enclosure Tech Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Aumes Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Aumes Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ganzhou Yuanfeng Compound Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ganzhou Yuanfeng Compound Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Garfield Home Furnishing Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Garfield Home Furnishing Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Dalian Xiesheng Construction Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dalian Xiesheng Construction Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hcb Office Equipment Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hcb Office Equipment Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Kd Craft Limited Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Kd Craft Limited Supplier Evaluation
Jinhua Racing Automotive Supply Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinhua Racing Automotive Supply Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Dazheng Yongye Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Dazheng Yongye Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Hengda Die-Casting Lock Factory Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Hengda Die-Casting Lock Factory Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Maidean Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Maidean Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Dkk Sealing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Dkk Sealing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Sunshine Garden Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Sunshine Garden Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Jinbao Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Jinbao Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuanming Printing (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuanming Printing (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026