Xiamen Nasda Clean Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Xiamen Nasda Clean Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Fujian, with a reported factory area of over 23,000㎡ and more than 50 staff. Based on the provided product listings, the company supplies non-woven fabric-related materials and disposable products, including spunbond polypropylene plant fabric, meltblown non-woven materials, non-woven cloth, disposable bibs/aprons, and GRS polypropylene meltblown non-woven products. The supplier demonstrates strong platform credibility, with 18 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and listed capabilities such as Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, Full Customization, and social responsibility labeling.

Commercial performance shows meaningful transaction value of CN¥2.9M+ over the past six months, but order volume and review count remain limited at 10+ orders and 4 reviews. Service responsiveness is acceptable but not fast, with response time within 5 hours. Delivery performance is moderate, with an 80.0% on-time dispatch rate. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking a verified, established non-woven materials supplier with customization capability, while requiring additional diligence on delivery stability and customer feedback depth.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company name: Xiamen Nasda Clean Technology Co., Ltd.
• Location: Fujian, China
• Factory area: 23,000+㎡
• Staff size: 50+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Product scope includes non-woven fabric materials, meltblown non-woven products, disposable bib/apron products, and polypropylene-based materials.

Elaboration

The supplier reports a factory area of over 23,000㎡, which indicates a meaningful physical production footprint. This is a positive indicator for buyers requiring manufacturing continuity and potential production scalability. However, the reported staff size of 50+ suggests the company may not be a very large-scale labor-intensive manufacturer, and the available data does not provide details on production lines, annual capacity, machinery, automation level, or output volume.

The presence of verified supplier status strengthens confidence that the company has undergone some level of platform-side verification. However, no specific factory audit report details, ISO certification, BSCI, SEDEX, GRS certificate documentation, or other formal factory management certifications are provided in the dataset. Therefore, while the company appears to have a solid operating base, the assessment cannot classify it as a fully proven large-scale industrial supplier without further production-capacity evidence.

Scoring Rationale

The factory size of 23,000+㎡ supports a relatively strong company-strength score, especially when combined with verified supplier status. The staff count of 50+ indicates operational capability but does not clearly support classification as a large-scale manufacturer. Since detailed production capacity, equipment list, production line count, and formal factory certifications are not provided, the score should remain in the medium-stable factory range rather than the top tier.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 18 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / industry labels provided:
• Socially responsible
• Finished product inspection
• ODM service available
• Full customization

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. An 18-year Gold Supplier history is a significant indicator of long-term platform presence. Trade Assurance support provides additional transactional protection for buyers using ’s platform mechanism. The verified supplier status further supports supplier credibility from a platform-validation perspective.

The listed labels also add value, especially Finished Product Inspection, ODM service availability, Full Customization, and social responsibility. These labels indicate that the supplier presents both compliance-related and service-related capabilities. However, the dataset does not include detailed third-party audit certificates, full compliance documents, certification numbers, expiration dates, or specific inspection standards. Therefore, while platform credibility is strong, formal compliance depth beyond platform labels cannot be fully confirmed.

Scoring Rationale

This supplier meets the strongest platform credibility indicators in the provided data: long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and multiple platform capability labels. The 18-year Gold Supplier duration is particularly strong. The score is not a full 20 because the available data does not provide detailed factory audit reports or complete third-party certification documentation.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 10+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥2.9M+
• Store rating: 5.0
• Number of reviews: 4

Elaboration

The supplier shows a relatively strong transaction amount of CN¥2.9M+ over the past six months, which indicates that some buyers have placed commercially meaningful orders. However, the reported order count is only 10+, which suggests that transaction activity may be concentrated in a limited number of orders rather than broad-based frequent purchasing.

The store rating of 5.0 is positive, but the review base is very small, with only 4 reviews. This limits the statistical reliability of the rating. A perfect score based on a small review count should be interpreted cautiously, as it does not yet demonstrate broad customer validation.

Overall, business performance appears commercially active but not deeply proven by high order volume or extensive customer feedback.

Scoring Rationale

The CN¥2.9M+ transaction value supports a solid performance score, as it demonstrates real commercial activity. However, 10+ orders and only 4 reviews are relatively limited, meaning buyer validation is not broad enough to justify a top-tier business-performance rating. The 5.0 rating is positive, but its credibility is constrained by the small review sample size.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤5h
• Full Customization: Listed
• ODM service available: Listed

Elaboration

The supplier has a response time of within 5 hours, which is acceptable for general B2B sourcing communication. It is not in the highest service tier, as the benchmark for top scoring is response within one hour. However, the availability of Full Customization and ODM service indicates the supplier can support customized product requirements rather than only standard catalog orders.

This is especially relevant for buyers seeking customized non-woven materials, disposable products, or product specifications. The data does not include details on design support, sample lead time, engineering team size, customization workflow, or multilingual sales support, so the service capability assessment must remain limited to the provided platform indicators.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates useful customization-related service capability through Full Customization and ODM service labels. However, response time of ≤5h is acceptable rather than highly responsive. Because no further service-process data is available, the supplier fits the normal-to-good service category rather than the premium service category.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time dispatch rate: 80.0%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate is reported at 80.0%. This places the company in the 80–89% range, which indicates moderate delivery reliability. It suggests that most shipments may be dispatched on time, but there remains a visible risk of delays.

For buyers with strict delivery windows, seasonal demand, or downstream production schedules, this delivery performance should be monitored carefully. The provided data does not include average lead time, late shipment frequency, logistics methods, production cycle, or historical shipment volume. Therefore, the assessment is based only on the stated on-time dispatch rate.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring framework, an on-time dispatch rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. Since the supplier is exactly at 80.0%, the score should be placed at the lower end of this band. This reflects acceptable but not strong delivery reliability.

Final Score

7 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 5.0
• Review count: 4
• Finished Product Inspection: Listed
• Verified supplier: True
• Socially responsible label: Listed

Elaboration

The supplier has a 5.0 store rating, which is favorable. It also lists Finished Product Inspection, which is an important quality-control indicator. Verified supplier status further supports a basic level of supplier credibility. These factors suggest the supplier has some quality assurance structure in place.

However, the review count is only 4, which limits the reliability of the customer feedback profile. A high rating with very few reviews does not provide the same confidence as a high rating supported by a large number of buyer evaluations. The data also does not provide defect rates, inspection reports, customer complaint history, return rate, product testing reports, or specific quality certifications.

As a result, the supplier appears to have positive quality indicators, but the customer feedback base is still insufficient for a top-tier quality rating.

Scoring Rationale

Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status provide meaningful quality assurance signals. The 5.0 rating is positive, but the low number of reviews prevents the score from reaching the highest band. The absence of detailed inspection records, test reports, or formal quality certifications also limits the quality confidence level.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditionally Recommended

Xiamen Nasda Clean Technology Co., Ltd. is recommended for buyers seeking an established China-based supplier of non-woven fabric-related products with verified platform credibility, long operating history, Trade Assurance support, and customization capability. The supplier is particularly suitable for buyers who value platform-backed sourcing, ODM availability, Full Customization, and Finished Product Inspection.

However, cooperation should be managed with appropriate controls. The main risks are the limited number of customer reviews, moderate order volume, and only 80.0% on-time dispatch rate. Buyers with strict delivery schedules should confirm production lead time, shipment timeline, and penalty terms before placing large orders. Buyers should also request product samples, inspection standards, and any available quality documentation before bulk procurement.

The supplier’s growth potential is supported by its 23,000+㎡ factory area, 18-year Gold Supplier status, CN¥2.9M+ recent transaction value, and customization-related labels. With stronger delivery performance and broader customer feedback accumulation, the supplier could move closer to a higher-tier procurement rating.