Xiamen Skma Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Xiamen Skma Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. is a Fujian, China-based supplier with a reported factory area of 5,000+ ㎡, 30+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its listed product scope focuses on PET plastic cans, pull-ring jars, plastic bottles, beverage-related packaging, and takeaway carrier bags, with relatively accessible MOQs ranging from 200 pieces to 10,000 pieces depending on product type. The supplier shows strong platform credibility, including 5 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, finished product inspection, 3D design capabilities, warranty availability, and an on-time delivery label of 98.2%. Business performance is also relatively strong, with 600+ orders and CN¥4.4M+ transaction value in the past six months. However, the store rating of 4.4 and 100+ reviews indicate solid but not top-tier customer feedback. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking verified packaging suppliers with stable delivery performance, moderate customization-related capability, and proven transaction activity.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Fujian, China
- Factory area: 5,000+ ㎡
- Employees: 30+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Product categories include PET plastic cans, pull-ring jars, plastic bottles, hot beverage packaging, and plastic carrier bags.

Elaboration
The supplier has a clearly stated physical production base with a 5,000+ ㎡ factory area and 30+ employees. This indicates an established operating entity rather than a purely trading-oriented storefront, especially when combined with verified supplier status. The listed product range is concentrated around plastic beverage and takeaway packaging, which suggests a focused rather than highly diversified manufacturing profile.

Scoring Rationale
The factory size is meaningful but not large-scale by industrial manufacturing standards, and the employee count of 30+ suggests a small-to-medium production organization. Verified supplier status improves confidence in operational legitimacy. However, the available data does not show large workforce scale, multiple production sites, advanced production capacity figures, or detailed factory certifications beyond verification status. Therefore, the company fits best into the “small to mid-sized but operationally established” category.

Final Score
14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier tenure: 5 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verification: Verified supplier status is True
- Certification / industry labels: Warranty available, 3D design capabilities, Finished product inspection, On-time delivery 98.2%

Elaboration
The supplier has multiple platform-level trust signals. A 5-year Gold Supplier history provides a reasonable track record on , while Trade Assurance adds transaction protection for buyers. The presence of finished product inspection and warranty availability also strengthens compliance and risk-control visibility. The 3D design capability label suggests some degree of pre-production support for product design or packaging customization.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates strong platform credibility through Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and multiple operational labels. The 5-year tenure is credible and stable, although not exceptionally long compared with suppliers with much longer platform histories. Certification information is platform-label based; no external ISO, food-contact, BRC, SGS test report, or regulatory compliance certificate is provided in the dataset. As a result, the score is high but not at the maximum level.

Final Score
17 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 600+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥4.4M+
- Store rating: 4.4
- Reviews: 100+

Elaboration
The supplier shows active recent commercial performance, with more than 600 orders and CN¥4.4M+ in transaction value over the past six months. This indicates that the supplier has ongoing buyer demand and a proven transaction record. The review count of 100+ provides a useful level of market feedback, though it is not extremely high. The store rating of 4.4 is acceptable but below the level typically associated with very high customer satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale
Order volume and transaction value are both strong indicators of market activity, especially within a recent six-month period. However, the 4.4 store rating moderates the assessment because it suggests customer experience is good but not outstanding. The review volume is sufficient to support basic commercial validation, but it does not represent a very large feedback base. Overall, the business performance is solid and active, but quality perception and review depth prevent a top-tier score.

Final Score
17 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- 3D design capabilities: Listed
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within two hours indicates reasonably prompt communication, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within one hour. The presence of 3D design capabilities may support design discussion or pre-production visualization. However, the dataset does not explicitly confirm Full Customization support, so customization capacity cannot be fully validated.

Scoring Rationale
Service capability is supported by acceptable response speed and a relevant design capability label. However, the response time is not at the highest level, and Full Customization is not provided in the data. Because the analysis must not assume unsupported capabilities, the score reflects a supplier with normal service responsiveness and partial customization-related support, rather than a highly responsive, fully customized service model.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 98.2%

Elaboration
The supplier reports an on-time delivery rate of 98.2%, which is a strong delivery-performance indicator. This figure is also included in the platform labels, reinforcing its visibility as part of the supplier’s operating profile. For procurement teams, this reduces concern around schedule reliability, particularly for repeat packaging orders where consistent replenishment timing is important.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. At 98.2%, the supplier performs near the upper end of the delivery benchmark. Since no negative delivery-related data is provided, the score is placed at the top of the category.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.4
- Reviews: 100+
- Finished product inspection: Listed
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory Verification: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a store rating of 4.4 based on 100+ reviews, showing that customer feedback exists and is generally positive, though not exceptional. Finished product inspection is listed, which provides a basic quality-control signal before shipment. Verified supplier status further supports baseline credibility. However, the data does not explicitly state Factory Verification as a separate label, and no detailed quality certifications, test reports, defect rates, or product compliance documentation are provided.

Scoring Rationale
The quality profile is supported by finished product inspection and a meaningful number of reviews. However, the 4.4 rating is moderate rather than excellent, and review volume is not large enough to indicate broad, highly validated customer satisfaction. The lack of explicit Factory Verification and absence of detailed quality compliance documents limit the quality assurance assessment. Therefore, the supplier is assessed as having adequate but not premium-level quality feedback.

Final Score
14 / 20

Total Score

79 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with normal supplier qualification controls.

This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking PET plastic cans, plastic bottles, pull-ring jars, beverage packaging, and takeaway packaging products with relatively accessible MOQs and proven transaction activity. It is especially appropriate for small to mid-sized importers, beverage packaging buyers, promotional packaging buyers, and customers that value delivery reliability and platform transaction protection.

The main risks are the moderate store rating of 4.4, limited employee scale, lack of explicit Full Customization confirmation, and insufficient data on external quality certifications or factory-level compliance documentation. Before placing large or long-term orders, buyers should request product samples, confirm material specifications, clarify customization capability, and verify any required compliance documents.

The supplier’s growth potential is supported by strong recent order activity, CN¥4.4M+ six-month transaction value, 5-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and excellent 98.2% on-time delivery performance.