Xiamen Dayan Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Xiamen Dayan Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Fujian, focused on smart toilet and intelligent sanitary ware products, including automatic sensor toilets, smart toilet bowls, and home-use smart toilets. The company shows a solid manufacturing foundation with a reported factory area of 20,000+㎡, 140+ staff, and verified supplier status. On , it holds 3 years of Gold Supplier membership, supports Trade Assurance, and lists compliance/service tags including Finished Product Inspection, Warranty Available, Full Customization, and ODM service.

Commercially, the supplier has achieved 90+ orders and CN¥878.9K+ transaction value over the past six months, indicating active but not yet high-volume marketplace performance. The store rating of 4.3 with 10+ reviews suggests acceptable feedback, though the review base remains limited. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking smart sanitary ware with low MOQ flexibility, customization capability, and moderate procurement risk, but larger-scale buyers should conduct further validation before bulk purchasing.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Company: Xiamen Dayan Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.
• Location: Fujian, China
• Factory area: 20,000+㎡
• Employees: 140+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory-audited supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively strong physical manufacturing base, with a factory size exceeding 20,000㎡ and more than 140 employees. This indicates that the company is not a small trading-only operation based on the provided data. The presence of verified supplier status further supports its operational credibility from a factory-capability perspective.

However, the provided data does not include annual production capacity, number of production lines, equipment details, monthly output, R&D team size, or specific factory audit reports. Therefore, while the supplier appears to have a stable manufacturing base, the available information is not sufficient to classify it as a fully large-scale or highly advanced production enterprise.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates clear factory scale, a meaningful workforce, and supplier verification, which places it above small-scale or weak-capability suppliers. The 20,000+㎡ area is a positive indicator for production stability, while 140+ employees suggests moderate operational capacity. However, because there is no disclosed production capacity or detailed factory certification information, the score should remain within the upper range for a medium-sized stable factory rather than the top tier.

Final Score

17 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 3 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / industry tags:
• Warranty available
• Finished product inspection
• Full customization
• ODM service available

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These are meaningful platform-level trust factors for international buyers, especially when evaluating transaction protection and supplier legitimacy.

The listed tags also show a relatively complete commercial support structure, including warranty, inspection, customization, and ODM capability. However, the Gold Supplier duration is 3 years, which is positive but not long enough to be considered a long-established platform record. Also, no specific third-party certifications, product safety certifications, or international compliance certificates are provided in the data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core credibility elements needed for procurement confidence: Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and verification. The certification/service tags are also relatively complete. The main limitation is that 3 years of Gold Supplier history is moderate rather than long-term, and there is insufficient data on formal product certifications or international compliance approvals. Therefore, the supplier fits the “core certifications are complete but platform history is relatively short” category.

Final Score

17 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 90+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥878.9K+
• Store rating: 4.3
• Review count: 10+

Elaboration

The supplier has demonstrated active marketplace performance, with more than 90 orders and CN¥878.9K+ in transaction value over the past six months. This shows that the supplier has real commercial activity and is not an inactive or purely newly listed store.

However, the review count is only 10+, which limits the strength of customer validation. The store rating of 4.3 is acceptable but not exceptional. For procurement decision-making, this means the supplier has proven transaction activity, but the customer feedback base is still relatively thin compared with suppliers that have hundreds of reviews or consistently higher ratings.

Scoring Rationale

The order volume and transaction amount indicate a stable medium level of commercial activity. The supplier is not lacking business validation, but it also does not yet show high-volume marketplace dominance. The 4.3 rating and limited review count reduce confidence compared with top-performing suppliers. Therefore, the score is placed in the lower-middle part of the “stable medium-scale transaction” range.

Final Score

14 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤2h
• Full customization: Available
• ODM service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier provides a response time of no more than 2 hours, which is acceptable for international procurement communication and indicates reasonable responsiveness. The availability of Full Customization and ODM service also suggests that the supplier can support more than standard product resale, potentially helping buyers with customized smart sanitary ware requirements.

However, the response time does not meet the strongest service benchmark of ≤1 hour. In addition, the data does not provide details on language capability, engineering support, sample lead time, design support process, or after-sales service response procedures. These missing details limit the ability to assign a top-tier service score.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates solid service capability through acceptable response speed and clear customization/ODM support. This makes it suitable for buyers needing product modification or private-label-style cooperation. However, because response time is ≤2h rather than ≤1h, and because detailed service workflow information is not available, the supplier should be scored as strong but not top-level.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 89.8%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 89.8%, which is close to the 90% threshold but still falls slightly below it. This indicates generally acceptable delivery performance, but not enough to be classified as highly reliable under the given scoring standard.

For procurement planning, this delivery level suggests that buyers should maintain reasonable lead-time buffers, especially for time-sensitive orders. The data does not include average lead time, production cycle, logistics methods, or historical delay reasons, so further delivery-risk assessment would be needed before large-volume or urgent purchasing.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% falls into the 7–8 point range. Since the supplier’s rate is 89.8%, it is at the very upper end of this band and very close to the 90% benchmark. Therefore, it receives the highest reasonable score within the 80–89% range, but not a 9 because it does not reach 90%.

Final Score

8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.3
• Review count: 10+
• Finished Product Inspection: Available
• Verified supplier / factory-audited supplier: True
• Warranty available: Listed

Elaboration

The supplier has several positive quality-related indicators, including Finished Product Inspection, warranty availability, and verified supplier status. These elements suggest that the company has some quality assurance structure in place and is not relying solely on informal product handling.

However, customer feedback is still limited. A 4.3 store rating is acceptable but not high, and the review count of 10+ is not enough to provide a broad customer satisfaction sample. The data also does not include defect rates, product certification documents, inspection reports, return rates, warranty claim statistics, or detailed quality control procedures. Therefore, while the supplier shows a basic quality assurance framework, the buyer should still verify product quality through samples and pre-shipment inspection.

Scoring Rationale

The score reflects a balance between positive quality assurance indicators and limited customer feedback depth. Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status support a moderate-to-good quality score. However, the 4.3 rating and small review base prevent the supplier from reaching the high-score range. The supplier appears to have basic quality systems, but the available data is not sufficient to confirm consistently high product quality at scale.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended with controlled risk and staged cooperation.

Xiamen Dayan Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers sourcing smart toilets and intelligent sanitary ware who require low MOQ flexibility, Trade Assurance protection, customization support, ODM service, and a supplier with verified factory presence. The supplier is particularly appropriate for small to medium-sized importers, distributors testing smart sanitary ware products, e-commerce sellers, and buyers requiring sample or pilot orders before scaling up.

Key risks include the limited review base of 10+, a moderate store rating of 4.3, and an on-time delivery rate of 89.8%, which is close to but below the 90% high-performance benchmark. Product certification details, production capacity, export market experience, and specific quality control records are Insufficient Data.

For procurement execution, buyers should start with sample orders or small trial batches, confirm product specifications carefully, request inspection documentation, and use Trade Assurance where possible. The supplier shows good growth potential due to its factory scale, customization capability, platform credibility, and active transaction record, but large-volume procurement should be preceded by quality validation and delivery-performance monitoring.