Jiangsu Dayan Down Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report: Jiangsu Dayan Down Products Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Jiangsu Dayan Down Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Jiangsu, offering duck down, goose down, and feather-related products with low minimum order quantities of 2 kilograms. The company reports a factory area of over 22,000㎡ and 30+ staff, and is marked as a verified supplier, indicating a basic manufacturing and verification foundation. Its platform profile shows 1 year as a Gold Supplier, with labels including Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, Minor Customization, and Warranty Available. However, Trade Assurance is not supported, and key business performance indicators such as six-month order volume, transaction value, store rating, and customer reviews are either missing or zero. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ sourcing, sampling, customization discussion, or early-stage supplier development in down and feather products. Procurement should proceed cautiously due to limited commercial track record visibility and insufficient customer feedback data.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company name: Jiangsu Dayan Down Products Co., Ltd.
• Country/region: China, Jiangsu Province
• Factory area: 22,000+㎡
• Employees: 30+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier reports a relatively large factory area of over 22,000㎡, which suggests that it has physical production or processing space suitable for handling down and feather-related products. The employee count of 30+ staff, however, is relatively moderate compared with the reported factory size. This indicates that while the supplier may have sufficient site capacity, its labor scale is not clearly aligned with a large-scale manufacturing operation based on the available data.

The supplier is marked as a verified supplier, which strengthens its basic credibility from a factory existence and supplier verification perspective. However, no additional factory audit details, production line numbers, annual capacity, machinery list, or formal factory certification information are provided.

Scoring Rationale

The large factory area supports a positive assessment of physical capacity, and the verified supplier status provides a basic level of confidence. However, the relatively small disclosed staff size and lack of production capacity data limit the ability to classify the supplier as a fully large-scale and highly stable supply chain partner. The company is stronger than a small workshop-level supplier but does not have enough disclosed evidence to support a top-tier score.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
• Trade Assurance: False
• Certification / industry labels: Warranty Available, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, Minor Customization
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has Gold Supplier status, but the duration is only 1 year, which indicates a relatively short platform history. The presence of verification and industry/service labels such as Finished Product Inspection and Warranty Available improves its platform credibility to some extent.

However, Trade Assurance is not supported. This is an important limitation because Trade Assurance often provides buyers with additional transaction protection on . The certification and label structure is useful but not comprehensive enough to indicate a mature, long-standing, highly protected platform compliance profile.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has basic platform credibility through Gold Supplier status and verified supplier status, along with several useful service and inspection-related labels. Nevertheless, the short Gold Supplier history and absence of Trade Assurance reduce the reliability of the platform-backed risk protection. The supplier demonstrates some compliance credibility, but it cannot be considered a fully mature or strongly protected supplier profile.

Final Score

13 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Past 6-month order volume: Insufficient Data
• Past 6-month transaction amount: Insufficient Data
• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Review count: 0

Elaboration

The supplier’s disclosed commercial performance data is very limited. There is no available information on order volume or transaction value over the past six months. Store rating is also missing, and the review count is listed as 0.

This creates a significant limitation for procurement evaluation because order volume, transaction amount, store rating, and customer reviews are important indicators of market validation, buyer satisfaction, and operational consistency. Without these data points, it is difficult to confirm whether the supplier has stable transaction activity or proven customer acceptance on the platform.

Scoring Rationale

The absence of six-month order and transaction data, together with zero reviews and no store rating, means the supplier lacks visible commercial validation. While the company may have production capability based on its factory profile, the platform data does not currently demonstrate proven business performance. Therefore, the score must remain low due to insufficient evidence of transaction scale and buyer feedback.

Final Score

6 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤4h
• Full Customization: Available
• Minor Customization: Available

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time is listed as within 4 hours, which indicates acceptable communication efficiency. While it does not meet the highest benchmark of responding within 1 hour, it is still reasonable for standard supplier communication.

The supplier also supports both Full Customization and Minor Customization, which suggests flexibility in handling buyer-specific requirements. This is a positive service capability indicator, especially for buyers who require product adjustment, tailored specifications, or customized sourcing discussions within the listed product categories.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a reasonable response time and clear customization capability. The availability of both full and minor customization strengthens its service profile. However, because the response time is not within 1 hour, it does not qualify for the highest service score. Overall, the supplier shows solid service capability based on the available data.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate. Based on the provided scoring standard, any on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the highest scoring range.

However, the data does not include the number of orders supporting this delivery rate. Therefore, while the percentage itself is excellent, the statistical strength of this indicator cannot be fully verified due to missing order volume data.

Scoring Rationale

According to the provided delivery scoring rule, a 100.0% on-time delivery rate supports a top score. The lack of order volume data should be noted as a limitation, but the delivery score is based directly on the disclosed on-time delivery percentage.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Review count: 0
• Finished Product Inspection: Available
• Factory / supplier verification: True
• Warranty Available: Available

Elaboration

The supplier has some quality assurance indicators, including Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status. The Warranty Available label also adds a degree of post-sale or product assurance signal, although no detailed warranty terms are provided.

However, customer-facing quality validation is weak. The store rating is missing, and the review count is 0. This means there is no visible buyer feedback to confirm product consistency, complaint handling, or satisfaction level. The quality system indicators are present, but the lack of customer feedback limits confidence in actual market performance.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves credit for Finished Product Inspection and verification-related information, which provide a basic quality control foundation. However, the absence of ratings and the lack of customer reviews prevent the supplier from receiving a high score. The current profile shows internal or platform-level quality indicators, but not enough customer-validated quality performance.

Final Score

13 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation recommended, with controlled trial orders first.

Jiangsu Dayan Down Products Co., Ltd. shows a reasonable manufacturing foundation, supported by a 22,000+㎡ factory area, verified supplier status, Finished Product Inspection, customization capability, and a reported 100.0% on-time delivery rate. The supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking duck down, goose down, or feather-related products with low MOQ requirements, sampling needs, or customized sourcing discussions.

However, the main risks are clear: no disclosed six-month order volume, no transaction amount, no store rating, and 0 reviews. In addition, the supplier has only 1 year of Gold Supplier history and does not support Trade Assurance. These factors reduce transaction security and commercial confidence.

For procurement teams, the recommended approach is to begin with sample evaluation or small trial orders, verify product quality specifications, confirm inspection standards, and request additional documentation before scaling volume. Growth potential exists due to the factory area, customization capability, and inspection label, but commercial reliability still requires further validation through actual purchasing experience.