Cangzhou New-Civic Animal Husbandry Equipment Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Cangzhou New-Civic Animal Husbandry Equipment Co., Ltd is a China-based supplier located in Hebei, offering low-MOQ plastic animal husbandry products such as poultry drinkers, rabbit drinking equipment, poultry waterers, feeders, and related plastic packaging items. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a small-scale but operationally verified supplier, with a factory area of 2,500+ sqm and 10+ staff. Its platform credibility is relatively solid, supported by 5 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status. Commercial performance shows 70+ orders and CN¥135.2K+ transaction value over the past six months, indicating active but not large-scale transaction volume. Delivery reliability is strong, with a 97.6% on-time delivery rate. However, the limited number of reviews and absence of explicit finished product inspection data create quality transparency limitations. This supplier is more suitable for small to mid-sized buyers seeking cost-effective livestock equipment with moderate customization or sourcing requirements.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Hebei, China
- Factory area: 2,500+ sqm
- Employees: 10+ staff
- Verified supplier / factory audit status: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a defined manufacturing footprint with a factory area above 2,500 sqm, which indicates a basic physical production base rather than a purely trading-oriented setup. However, the employee count of 10+ staff suggests a relatively small organizational scale. The verified supplier status strengthens confidence that the company has passed some level of supplier verification or factory-related review, but the available data does not include detailed production lines, annual capacity, equipment list, or export scale.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates basic manufacturing capability and has verification support, which prevents it from being classified as weak or unverified. However, the limited staff size and lack of detailed production capacity data make it difficult to rate it as a medium or large-scale stable factory. Its strength lies in having a physical and verified operating base, while its limitation is the relatively small visible workforce and insufficient production scale disclosure.

Final Score
12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 5 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / platform tags: “Response time ≤2h”, “On-time delivery 97.6%”
- Verified supplier status: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a relatively mature presence, supported by 5 years of Gold Supplier membership and Trade Assurance. These factors provide buyers with platform-level transaction protection and indicate continuity on the marketplace. The verified supplier status further improves credibility. However, the provided certification tags are mainly service and delivery-related, and there is no data showing specific product certifications, industry compliance certificates, or third-party quality management certifications.

Scoring Rationale
A 5-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status create a credible platform profile. This is stronger than a basic or newly registered supplier. However, because the data does not show detailed certification coverage beyond platform-level verification and operational tags, the supplier does not reach the highest compliance credibility tier.

Final Score
17 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 70+
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥135.2K+
- Store rating: 4.7
- Number of reviews: 10

Elaboration
The supplier has measurable recent transaction activity, with more than 70 orders in the past six months. The transaction value of CN¥135.2K+ indicates active sales, though the scale is not high compared with larger-volume suppliers. A 4.7 store rating is positive, but the review base of 10 is relatively limited, reducing the statistical strength of customer feedback. The business data supports the view that the supplier has proven market activity but remains at a moderate or developing transaction scale.

Scoring Rationale
The order count shows a functioning commercial track record, and the store rating is favorable. However, the relatively low transaction amount and small number of reviews limit the evidence of broad buyer validation. The supplier performs better than a minimally validated seller, but the data does not support classification as a high-volume, highly validated supplier.

Final Score
15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within two hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for general sourcing inquiries. This is useful for buyers who require timely quotation follow-up or order coordination. However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM, ODM, packaging customization, mold development, or technical modification services.

Scoring Rationale
The response speed is strong enough to support efficient buyer communication, but the absence of customization-related information prevents a higher score. Since service capability is evaluated not only by response time but also by customization support, the supplier should be rated as having normal service capability rather than advanced service capability.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 97.6%

Elaboration
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate of 97.6% is strong and exceeds the 90% threshold for the highest scoring range. This suggests reliable fulfillment performance based on the platform-provided delivery metric. No additional data is provided regarding average lead time, logistics methods, urgent order capacity, or delay dispute history.

Scoring Rationale
The 97.6% on-time delivery rate directly supports a high delivery performance score. While other delivery details are not available, the provided metric is clear and significantly above the benchmark for strong performance.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.7
- Number of reviews: 10
- Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: True, based on provided verified supplier / factory audit status

Elaboration
The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.7, which indicates generally favorable customer satisfaction among recorded buyers. However, the review count is only 10, so the feedback base is limited. Verified supplier or factory audit status provides some support for supplier reliability, but there is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, third-party quality inspection procedures, product testing reports, or quality management certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has acceptable customer feedback and some verification support, but the limited number of reviews and missing finished product inspection data reduce quality assurance confidence. The quality profile is reasonable for lower-risk, standard procurement, but not sufficiently documented for buyers requiring strict quality control or compliance-heavy sourcing.

Final Score
14 / 20

Total Score

75 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for small to mid-sized buyers seeking cost-effective animal husbandry plastic products with moderate order requirements. The supplier is suitable for buyers prioritizing low MOQ options, basic livestock equipment sourcing, Trade Assurance protection, and reliable delivery performance.

Main risk points include limited visible company scale, only 10 recorded reviews, insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, and no provided evidence of product-specific certifications or advanced customization capability. Buyers should request product samples, confirm inspection standards, clarify customization options, and verify packaging, lead time, and after-sales terms before placing larger orders.

Overall, the supplier shows good platform credibility, active recent transactions, and strong delivery performance. Its growth potential is supported by stable activity and verified supplier status, but stronger quality documentation and broader customer feedback would be needed to support larger or higher-compliance procurement programs.