Anhui Haidila Electric Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Supplier Evaluation Report: Anhui Haidila Electric Technology Co., Ltd

Executive Summary
Anhui Haidila Electric Technology Co., Ltd is a China-based supplier located in Anhui, offering EV charging products including DC fast chargers and commercial EV charging stations in the 40kW to 480kW range, based on the provided product listings. The company shows a moderate production foundation with a reported factory area of 6,800+㎡, 50+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is relatively solid, supported by 3 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and listed service/quality labels such as Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service, and warranty availability.
Commercial performance is still limited, with only 6 orders and 3 reviews in the past six months, although the transaction value of CN¥270.4K+ indicates some business activity. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking small to medium-volume EV charger procurement, pilot orders, customized projects, or supplier development. Key risks include limited review volume and relatively low order count.
Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength — 20 Points
Basis
- Factory location: Anhui, China
- Factory area: 6,800+㎡
- Employee count: 50+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier has a reported production site of 6,800+㎡ and more than 50 employees, indicating an established operational base rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. The factory size and workforce suggest the company has basic to moderate production capacity for EV charging equipment. The verified supplier status provides additional credibility regarding company existence and operational verification, although the provided data does not specify detailed factory audit reports, production line numbers, annual output, equipment list, or capacity utilization.
Scoring Rationale
The company does not appear to qualify as a large-scale manufacturing group based on the available data, as the employee count and factory area are moderate. However, the presence of a physical factory, 50+ staff, and supplier verification supports a stable manufacturing foundation. Because production scale details are incomplete, a high score above 17 would not be justified. The supplier fits best within the “medium stable factory” range.
Final Score
15 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 3 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Listed labels: Warranty available, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service available
Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform trust indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These elements help reduce transaction risk for international buyers, especially for first-time cooperation. The 3-year Gold Supplier history shows some platform continuity, although it is not long enough to be considered a long-established supplier. The presence of quality and service-related labels also improves compliance credibility, but no third-party product certifications or specific factory management certifications were provided.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has core credibility elements: Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and verification. However, the Gold Supplier tenure is relatively moderate at 3 years, and there is insufficient data regarding formal factory certifications, product safety certifications, or internationally recognized compliance documents. Therefore, the supplier demonstrates good but not fully mature platform credibility.
Final Score
16 / 20
3. Business Performance — 20 Points
Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 6
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥270.4K+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 3
Elaboration
The supplier has recorded commercial activity, with 6 orders and CN¥270.4K+ transaction value over the past six months. This indicates that the supplier has completed platform transactions, but the order count remains low. The 5.0 store rating is positive, but it is based on only 3 reviews, which limits the statistical reliability of customer feedback. The transaction amount suggests that products may be higher-value industrial equipment, but order frequency is still limited based on the provided data.
Scoring Rationale
Business performance is partially validated but not strong enough to be categorized as high-volume or highly proven. The low order count and small review base create uncertainty regarding repeat purchasing, customer diversity, and long-term commercial stability. The transaction value is a positive factor, but the limited number of orders and reviews keeps the score in the lower-to-mid range.
Final Score
12 / 20
4. Service Capability — 10 Points
Basis
- Response time: ≤4h
- Full Customization: Listed
- ODM service available: Listed
Elaboration
The supplier reports a response time of within 4 hours, which is acceptable for international B2B communication but does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within 1 hour. The availability of Full Customization and ODM service indicates that the supplier can support customized project requirements to some extent. However, no further information is provided regarding engineering team size, design process, sample development time, after-sales service structure, or multilingual support.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates adequate service capability due to its acceptable response speed and listed customization/ODM capabilities. However, because the response time is not within 1 hour and detailed service infrastructure is not provided, it should not receive a top-tier score. The supplier is suitable for buyers requiring basic customization communication, but service depth still requires further verification.
Final Score
8 / 10
5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points
Basis
- On-time dispatch rate: 100.0%
Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. This suggests that completed platform orders have been dispatched within the committed timeframe. However, the data does not provide total shipment quantity, average lead time, destination markets, logistics modes, or performance consistency across larger order volumes.
Scoring Rationale
Based strictly on the provided benchmark, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for a score of 9 to 10 points. Since the reported rate is 100.0%, the supplier deserves the maximum score in this category. The only limitation is that the order base appears small, but the scoring criterion is directly tied to the dispatch rate.
Final Score
10 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points
Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 3
- Finished Product Inspection: Listed
- Verified supplier: True
- Warranty available: Listed
Elaboration
The supplier has a perfect store rating of 5.0, which is positive, but the review count is only 3, making the feedback base limited. Finished Product Inspection is listed, indicating that some level of outbound quality control is available. Warranty availability also supports post-sale quality assurance. Verified supplier status further strengthens basic credibility. However, the provided data does not include detailed inspection standards, defect rates, product certification documents, warranty terms, or independent quality audit results.
Scoring Rationale
The quality profile is favorable but not fully proven. The 5.0 rating and Finished Product Inspection label support a good quality score, while the very limited number of reviews prevents classification as a highly validated supplier with broad customer confirmation. Because quality assurance indicators exist but customer feedback volume is low, the supplier fits the “good rating with basic quality system” category.
Final Score
16 / 20
Total Score
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Company Strength | 15 / 20 |
| Platform & Compliance Credibility | 16 / 20 |
| Business Performance | 12 / 20 |
| Service Capability | 8 / 10 |
| Delivery Performance | 10 / 10 |
| Quality & Customer Feedback | 16 / 20 |
| Total Score | 77 / 100 |
Procurement Recommendation
Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended
Anhui Haidila Electric Technology Co., Ltd is recommended for small to medium-volume procurement, pilot projects, sample orders, and customized EV charger sourcing, especially where buyers value Trade Assurance, supplier verification, Finished Product Inspection, and customization capability.
The supplier shows a reasonable manufacturing base and strong platform credibility, supported by a 6,800+㎡ factory, 50+ staff, 3-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and 100.0% on-time dispatch rate. However, buyers should remain cautious because business validation is still limited, with only 6 orders and 3 reviews in the past six months.
Main risks:
- Low review count limits customer feedback reliability
- Low recent order volume limits commercial validation
- Insufficient data on product certifications, factory audit details, production capacity, and quality inspection standards
Growth potential:
The supplier has potential as a developing EV charging equipment manufacturer with customization and ODM capability. It may be suitable for buyers willing to begin with controlled trial orders before scaling procurement volume.
Leave your comment