Anping County Yaoan Wiremesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Anping County Yaoan Wiremesh Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based wire mesh supplier located in Hebei, with a reported factory area of 6,000+ sqm and 30+ staff. The supplier appears to focus on stainless steel wire mesh, test sieves, BBQ grill mesh, and related wire mesh products, with flexible MOQ structures ranging from 1 piece to 1,000 square meters depending on product type. Its profile shows basic platform credibility, including 1 year as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service availability, Full Customization, and Minor Customization. Commercial performance is still limited, with 7 orders and CN¥6.7K+ transaction value over the past six months. The supplier has a 5.0 store rating, but only 1 review, so customer feedback validation remains weak. Overall, this supplier is suitable for small to medium buyers, sample-based procurement, customized wire mesh orders, and buyers willing to verify quality before scaling.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Factory location: Hebei, China
- Factory area: 6,000+ sqm
- Staff size: 30+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Product scope includes stainless steel wire mesh, test sieves, BBQ grill mesh, and related mesh products
Elaboration
The supplier has a documented factory area of more than 6,000 sqm, which indicates a physical production base rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. The staff size of 30+ suggests a small to lower-mid-sized operation. The verified supplier status provides some support for the existence and basic legitimacy of the business. However, there is no provided data on production lines, monthly capacity, machinery, annual output, export percentage, or major customer references.
Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates basic manufacturing capability through its factory area, employee count, and verified supplier status. However, the workforce size is relatively modest, and the absence of detailed production capacity data limits confidence in its ability to handle large-scale or highly time-sensitive procurement programs. It is stronger than a very small or unverified supplier, but the available data does not support classification as a large-scale stable supply chain.
Final Score
14 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier tenure: 1 year
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry tags: Finished Product Inspection, ODM service available, Full Customization, Minor Customization
Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. The presence of Finished Product Inspection and customization-related tags also strengthens the profile from a compliance and service capability perspective. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, which limits the depth of long-term platform credibility. No external certifications, management system certificates, product compliance documents, or third-party audit reports are provided in the supplied data.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has the core trust mechanisms expected for initial sourcing: Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and verification. This makes it more credible than an unverified or non-Trade-Assurance supplier. However, the short Gold Supplier tenure and lack of additional certification evidence prevent a higher score. The profile is credible for cautious sourcing, but not yet strongly validated over a long operating history on the platform.
Final Score
15 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 7
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥6.7K+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 1
Elaboration
The supplier has recorded transaction activity, but the scale is limited. Seven orders over six months and CN¥6.7K+ in transaction value indicate that the supplier has completed some platform-based sales, yet the commercial volume remains low. The 5.0 store rating is positive, but the review base is only 1, which is insufficient to establish a reliable customer satisfaction trend.
Scoring Rationale
Business performance is validated to some extent because there are recorded orders and transaction value. However, both order count and transaction amount are low, and the review sample is too small to support strong commercial confidence. The perfect rating is favorable but statistically weak due to only one review. This profile fits an early-stage or low-volume supplier rather than a commercially proven high-volume vendor.
Final Score
11 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: Available
- Minor Customization: Available
- ODM service: Available
Elaboration
The supplier shows relatively responsive communication, with a stated response time of within 2 hours. Customization capability is a clear advantage, as the profile includes Full Customization, Minor Customization, and ODM service availability. This is relevant for buyers requiring adjusted specifications, sizes, mesh types, or product formats. However, there is no data on engineering team size, sample lead time, design support process, or after-sales service system.
Scoring Rationale
The response time is good, though not within the ≤1 hour benchmark for the highest service score. The availability of Full Customization and ODM service strengthens the supplier’s service capability and makes it suitable for customized procurement. Due to the lack of deeper service process data, the score remains in the upper-middle range rather than the top tier.
Final Score
8 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is a strong delivery indicator. Based on the provided scoring standard, a delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the highest score range. However, the underlying order base is limited, with only 7 orders in the past six months, so the delivery performance is positive but based on a relatively small commercial sample.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier meets the top delivery benchmark based on the reported 100.0% on-time delivery rate. The small transaction volume should be noted as a limitation, but the available data itself supports a high delivery score. There is no provided evidence of late shipment issues.
Final Score
10 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 1
- Finished Product Inspection: Available
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory verification / supplier verification: True based on provided verified supplier status
Elaboration
The supplier has a strong nominal store rating of 5.0 and indicates Finished Product Inspection capability. Verified supplier status also supports a basic level of quality and operational credibility. However, the customer feedback base is very limited, with only 1 review. No defect rate, inspection reports, product test certificates, compliance documents, or third-party quality audit results are provided.
Scoring Rationale
The quality profile is supported by Finished Product Inspection and a perfect store rating, but the low number of reviews limits confidence in consistency. The supplier appears to have basic quality assurance mechanisms, but the data is insufficient to confirm performance across many customers or repeated orders. Therefore, the supplier deserves a moderate-to-good score, but not a top-tier rating.
Final Score
15 / 20
Total Score
73 / 100
- Company Strength: 14 / 20
- Platform & Compliance Credibility: 15 / 20
- Business Performance: 11 / 20
- Service Capability: 8 / 10
- Delivery Performance: 10 / 10
- Quality & Customer Feedback: 15 / 20
Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation is recommended on a cautious and controlled basis, especially for sample orders, small to medium-volume purchases, and customized stainless steel wire mesh or related mesh products. The supplier has a verified physical base, Trade Assurance support, customization capability, Finished Product Inspection, and strong reported delivery performance.
The most suitable customer types are small and medium buyers, distributors testing new mesh products, buyers requiring customized specifications, and procurement teams willing to start with trial orders before scaling. The main risks are limited operating history, low six-month transaction value, only 7 recent orders, and only 1 customer review. These factors mean commercial reliability and long-term quality consistency are not yet strongly proven by platform data.
Growth potential exists if the supplier can increase transaction volume, accumulate more reviews, maintain delivery performance, and provide stronger quality documentation. For larger-volume procurement, buyers should request samples, confirm specifications, require pre-shipment inspection, and use Trade Assurance before placing scaled orders.
Leave your comment