Anping County Huijin Wire Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Anping County Huijin Wire Mesh Co., Ltd. is a China-based wire mesh supplier located in Hebei, with a reported factory area of over 4,000㎡ and more than 40 staff. Its product range in the provided data focuses on expanded metal mesh, galvanized expanded metal, ceiling mesh panels, perforated aluminum expanded mesh sheets, and aluminum expanded metal products. The supplier shows strong platform credibility, supported by 16 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, supplier/factory verification, and platform labels including finished product inspection, ODM service availability, and low MOQ customization. Commercial performance is moderate: the supplier has generated CN¥2.3M+ in transaction value over the past six months, but only 10+ orders and 2 reviews, which limits customer feedback depth. Delivery performance is strong with a 100.0% on-time shipment rate. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking verified mesh-product suppliers with stable platform credibility, moderate production scale, and reliable delivery, while buyers requiring extensive customer validation should conduct additional checks.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 4,000+㎡
- Employees: 40+ staff
- Factory/supplier verification: True
- Location: Hebei, China

Elaboration
The supplier has a clearly stated physical production base and workforce size. A factory area of over 4,000㎡ and more than 40 staff indicate a real manufacturing operation with basic-to-moderate production capacity. The presence of supplier/factory verification improves confidence that the company is not only a trading storefront but has some verified operational foundation.

Scoring Rationale
The company does not qualify as a large-scale supply chain based on the provided factory size and employee count, but it exceeds the level of a very small or weak supplier. Verification strengthens its credibility and supports a stable mid-small factory profile. However, the data does not provide production lines, annual output, machinery list, or capacity figures, so the score should remain in the medium range rather than high.

Final Score
15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 16 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verification: True
- Certification / industry labels: Low MOQ for customization, Finished product inspection, ODM service available

Elaboration
The supplier has a long platform history, which is a strong credibility signal. Sixteen years as a Gold Supplier suggests sustained platform presence. Trade Assurance provides transaction-level protection, while the verification status and platform labels add further confidence in supplier transparency and service structure.

Scoring Rationale
This is one of the supplier’s strongest areas. The combination of long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance, verification, and relevant operational labels forms a complete platform credibility profile. The only limitation is that the data does not include internationally recognized third-party certifications such as ISO or product-specific compliance documents, so the score is slightly below perfect.

Final Score
19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Past 6-month orders: 10+
- Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥2.3M+
- Store rating: 4.8
- Reviews: 2

Elaboration
The transaction value of CN¥2.3M+ indicates meaningful commercial activity over the past six months. However, the order count of 10+ is not high, and only 2 reviews are available. The 4.8 store rating is positive, but the limited number of reviews weakens the statistical reliability of customer feedback.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates real transaction activity and a good rating, but the low review count and moderate order volume prevent it from being classified as a high-volume, highly validated supplier. The transaction amount is a positive indicator, suggesting some larger-value orders may exist, but this cannot be further confirmed from the provided data.

Final Score
15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Response time: ≤2h
- Customization-related labels: Low MOQ for customization, ODM service available
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within two hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency. The platform labels show support for ODM service and low MOQ customization, which suggests some level of customized production or product adaptation capability. However, the provided data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization.

Scoring Rationale
Service capability is solid but not top-tier under the given criteria. A response time of ≤2h is good, but not within the ≤1h benchmark required for the highest score range. Customization capability is supported by ODM and low MOQ customization labels, but the absence of explicit Full Customization data limits the score.

Final Score
8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time shipment rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time shipment rate, which is the strongest possible delivery indicator under the provided scoring framework. This suggests reliable delivery execution for recorded platform transactions.

Scoring Rationale
Since the on-time shipment rate is above 90%, the supplier qualifies for the highest delivery performance scoring range. No negative delivery-related data is provided. However, the order base is only listed as 10+ orders in the past six months, so the score is strong but should be interpreted alongside the relatively limited transaction count.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.8
- Reviews: 2
- Finished product inspection: Present
- Factory verification: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a high store rating of 4.8 and quality-related platform support through finished product inspection. Factory verification further strengthens confidence in operational transparency. However, only 2 reviews are available, which is too limited to establish broad customer satisfaction trends.

Scoring Rationale
The quality assurance indicators are positive, especially finished product inspection and factory verification. The rating is also strong, but the very small review count materially limits customer feedback reliability. Therefore, the supplier should be rated as having good basic quality assurance but insufficient customer feedback volume for a top-tier score.

Final Score
16 / 20

Total Score

83 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled order validation. This supplier is suitable for buyers sourcing expanded metal mesh, galvanized expanded mesh, aluminum expanded mesh, perforated mesh sheets, and related mesh products, especially customers who value verified platform history, Trade Assurance, moderate MOQ options, ODM availability, and reliable delivery performance.

The main risks are limited customer review volume, moderate order count, and insufficient data on full customization capability, production equipment, annual capacity, and international certifications. Its growth potential lies in its long operating history, verified supplier status, finished product inspection label, and strong on-time shipment rate. For larger or specification-critical procurement, buyers should request product samples, inspection reports, production capacity details, and any applicable compliance documents before scaling orders.