zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Qingdao Yanpeng Greenhouse Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Qingdao Yanpeng Greenhouse Engineering Co., Ltd. is a China-based greenhouse engineering supplier located in Shandong Province, with a reported factory area of 4,500+ m² and 20+ staff. The company offers multiple agricultural greenhouse-related products, including single-span tomato greenhouses, prefab agricultural greenhouse frames, Gothic arch greenhouses, plastic greenhouses, and farm tunnel greenhouses. Its platform profile shows Gold Supplier status for 2 years, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service availability, Full Customization, and response time within 4 hours.

From a procurement perspective, the supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking greenhouse structures with customization requirements and relatively low-to-medium MOQ flexibility. However, business validation is limited: only 2 orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value were recorded in the past six months, with 0 customer reviews and no available store rating. While delivery performance is strong at 100.0% on-time shipment, the limited review base and modest transaction history create verification risk for larger-volume procurement.

Qingdao Yanpeng Greenhouse Engineering Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Shandong Province, China
- Factory area: 4,500+ m²
- Employee count: 20+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Product scope includes multiple agricultural greenhouse structures and greenhouse frames

Elaboration
The supplier has a physical manufacturing base with a reported factory area above 4,500 m², which indicates a defined production site rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. The employee count of 20+ staff suggests a small-to-medium operational scale. The company’s listed products are concentrated around greenhouse structures, including steel skeleton greenhouses, prefab agricultural frames, Gothic arch structures, plastic greenhouses, and farm tunnel greenhouses. This product concentration supports a focused supply capability within greenhouse engineering and agricultural structure products.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates basic factory capability and has verified supplier status, which supports production credibility. However, the reported staff size is relatively limited, and the factory area, while meaningful, does not indicate a large-scale industrial supply base. Based on the available data, the supplier fits better as a small-to-medium specialized manufacturer rather than a large-scale, highly mature supply chain operator.

Final Score
14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry labels: Finished Product Inspection, ODM service available, Full customization, Response time ≤4h

Elaboration
The supplier has core platform trust indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These elements provide baseline platform credibility and reduce procurement risk compared with suppliers lacking transaction protection or verification. The presence of Finished Product Inspection also supports quality control credibility, while ODM and Full Customization labels indicate the platform recognizes certain service and customization capabilities.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has several important credibility indicators, but the Gold Supplier duration is only 2 years, which limits the strength of long-term platform trust. The certification label set is useful, but there is no additional data provided on international management certifications, product certifications, or third-party factory audit details beyond the verified supplier and inspection labels. Therefore, the supplier shows solid but not top-tier platform credibility.

Final Score
16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 2
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥67.6K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded platform transactions in the past six months, but the volume is limited. Two orders and CN¥67.6K+ in transaction value show that the supplier has some commercial activity, yet the scale is relatively low. The absence of store rating data and the 0 review count significantly reduce the ability to validate buyer satisfaction, repeat purchasing behavior, or market acceptance through customer feedback.

Scoring Rationale
Business performance is the weakest area in the evaluation. Although the supplier is not commercially inactive, the order count and transaction amount do not demonstrate a strong sales track record. The lack of reviews and missing store rating prevent deeper validation of customer experience. For procurement teams, this means commercial reliability should be verified through direct communication, sample orders, or smaller pilot purchases before larger commitments.

Final Score
10 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤4h
- Full Customization: Available
- ODM service: Available

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time is listed as within 4 hours, which indicates acceptable communication responsiveness, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within 1 hour. The availability of Full Customization and ODM service is valuable for greenhouse projects, as buyers may require structure adaptation, size adjustment, framing design changes, or project-specific configurations. These service labels suggest the supplier can support more than standard catalog-based procurement.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows good service capability due to its customization and ODM labels. However, the response time is ≤4h rather than ≤1h, so it should not receive the highest service score. Based on the available data, service capability appears suitable for buyers requiring configurable greenhouse solutions, but communication speed is moderate rather than excellent.

Final Score
8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time shipment rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The reported on-time shipment rate is 100.0%, which is a strong indicator of delivery discipline on the platform. This suggests that the supplier has met committed shipment timelines for recorded transactions. For greenhouse structure procurement, delivery reliability is important because delayed frames or materials can affect installation schedules and agricultural project timelines.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate above 90% qualifies for a 9–10 score range. The supplier’s 100.0% rate supports a high delivery performance score. However, given that the recent order count is only 2, the data sample is limited, so the score should remain strong but not be interpreted as fully proven across high-volume order history.

Final Score
9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Finished Product Inspection: Available
- Verified supplier: True
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0
- On-time shipment rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier has Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status, which provide some quality assurance foundation. These indicators are positive because they suggest that product inspection and supplier verification mechanisms exist on the platform profile. However, the absence of customer reviews and missing store rating data limit the ability to assess actual buyer satisfaction, product consistency, after-sales handling, or long-term quality performance.

Scoring Rationale
The quality assurance framework is partially supported by Finished Product Inspection and verification status, but customer feedback is insufficient. A supplier with no reviews and no available rating cannot be considered strongly validated by the market, even if platform quality labels are present. Therefore, the quality score should reflect a moderate level of confidence, with a clear need for buyer-side verification before large-scale procurement.

Final Score
13 / 20

Total Score

70 / 100

  • Company Strength: 14 / 20
  • Platform & Compliance Credibility: 16 / 20
  • Business Performance: 10 / 20
  • Service Capability: 8 / 10
  • Delivery Performance: 9 / 10
  • Quality & Customer Feedback: 13 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended, especially for buyers seeking agricultural greenhouse structures, prefab greenhouse frames, tunnel greenhouses, or customized greenhouse solutions with flexible MOQ options. The supplier is more suitable for small-to-medium procurement projects, trial orders, customized project inquiries, or buyers who can conduct technical confirmation before purchase.

The main strengths are verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, Full Customization, ODM service availability, Finished Product Inspection, and a 100.0% on-time shipment rate. These indicators provide a reasonable foundation for initial sourcing engagement.

The main risks are limited commercial proof, only 2 orders in the past six months, CN¥67.6K+ recent transaction value, 0 customer reviews, and no available store rating. These gaps reduce confidence in market validation and customer satisfaction.

Recommended procurement approach: start with a sample order, pilot project, or small-volume purchase; request detailed drawings, material specifications, production photos, inspection records, and delivery schedule confirmation before scaling up. The supplier has growth potential if it can increase transaction volume, accumulate verified reviews, and build a stronger customer feedback record.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Qingzhou Guangyuan Greenhouse Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Guangyuan Greenhouse Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Xinguangzheng Global Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Xinguangzheng Global Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Evu Environmental And Engineering Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Evu Environmental And Engineering Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Xinguangzheng Xinyuan Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Xinguangzheng Xinyuan Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Skyplant Greenhouse Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Skyplant Greenhouse Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Zhongnong Greenhouse Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Zhongnong Greenhouse Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Leader Greenhouse Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Leader Greenhouse Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Fengzhiyuan Greenhouse Equipment Manufacturing Co. Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Fengzhiyuan Greenhouse Equipment Manufacturing Co. Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Cangzhou Zhuotai Greenhouse Equipment Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cangzhou Zhuotai Greenhouse Equipment Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wincoo Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wincoo Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taian Shelley Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taian Shelley Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Zaoye Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Zaoye Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Weizhengheng Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Weizhengheng Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Starway Engineering & Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Starway Engineering & Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Howo Engineering Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Howo Engineering Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Nuoman Engineering Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Nuoman Engineering Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tangyin Xinxing Plastics Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tangyin Xinxing Plastics Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Huaao Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Huaao Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Cisco Fire Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Cisco Fire Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Epoch Development Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Epoch Development Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shandong Tenor Water Treatment Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Tenor Water Treatment Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Century Science And Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Century Science And Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Winture New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Winture New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Guangyuan Greenhouse Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Guangyuan Greenhouse Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Xuhui Non-Woven Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Xuhui Non-Woven Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Duncheng Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Duncheng Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Hechuan Xianglin Glass Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Hechuan Xianglin Glass Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sweeu Knives Jiangsu Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sweeu Knives Jiangsu Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Meisheng Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Meisheng Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Botuolini Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Botuolini Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Dom Machinery Equipment Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Dom Machinery Equipment Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Medsinglong Co Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Medsinglong Co Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Yancheng Lianggong Formwork Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yancheng Lianggong Formwork Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Jiuyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Jiuyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing Fenglang Imp & Exp Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing Fenglang Imp & Exp Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongying Zhengda Metal Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongying Zhengda Metal Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shengzhou First Garment & Necktie Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shengzhou First Garment & Necktie Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Nuote Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Nuote Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Shanghao Automotive Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Shanghao Automotive Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Dingfeng Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Dingfeng Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026