Jiangsu Skyplant Greenhouse Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Jiangsu Skyplant Greenhouse Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based greenhouse and hydroponic systems supplier located in Jiangsu, with a reported factory area of 6,400+ m² and 30+ staff. The supplier shows a relatively credible platform profile, supported by 12 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, verified supplier status, and listed service/quality tags including Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, Full Customization, and Warranty Available. Its commercial performance appears moderate, with 50+ orders and CN¥1.5M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.7 store rating and 20+ reviews. However, the on-time delivery rate of 66.7% is a clear operational concern and should be closely managed before bulk purchasing. Overall, this supplier is more suitable for buyers seeking greenhouse, hydroponic, and related agricultural equipment with customization requirements, but procurement should begin with controlled trial orders and clear delivery terms.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company name: Jiangsu Skyplant Greenhouse Technology Co., Ltd.
• Location: Jiangsu, China
• Factory area: 6,400+ m²
• Employees: 30+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a physical production base with a stated factory area of over 6,400 m², which indicates a meaningful operating footprint rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. The employee count of 30+ staff suggests a relatively lean organization, which may be sufficient for specialized greenhouse and hydroponic product supply but does not indicate a large-scale industrial workforce. The presence of verified supplier status adds credibility to the existence and basic operational legitimacy of the company.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic-to-moderate production capability through its factory area and verified supplier status. However, the staffing scale remains relatively small, and the data does not provide detailed evidence of production lines, annual capacity, equipment lists, export volume, or factory audit reports beyond the verified supplier indication. Therefore, it should not be scored as a large-scale stable supply chain. It fits best within the lower-to-middle range of a medium stable factory profile.

Final Score

14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 12 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / industry tags:
• Warranty available
• Finished product inspection
• ODM service available
• Full customization

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. A 12-year Gold Supplier history indicates long-term presence on , while Trade Assurance provides buyers with a transaction protection mechanism. The verified supplier status further strengthens credibility from a platform compliance perspective. The listed tags also show that the supplier presents a relatively complete commercial and service capability profile, especially with warranty availability, inspection support, ODM service, and customization.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and multiple relevant platform tags supports a high credibility score. The available information aligns closely with the top scoring band for platform and compliance reliability. The only reason not to assign a perfect score is that the provided data does not include specific third-party factory audit documents, ISO certifications, product certifications, or detailed compliance certificates.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in past six months: 50+
• Transaction value in past six months: CN¥1.5M+
• Store rating: 4.7
• Number of reviews: 20+

Elaboration

The supplier has demonstrated active commercial performance over the most recent six-month period. More than 50 orders and over CN¥1.5 million in transaction value indicate ongoing buyer engagement and a measurable sales record. The store rating of 4.7 is positive, suggesting generally favorable customer satisfaction. However, the review count of 20+ is not large, so the customer feedback base is still somewhat limited.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows stable business activity with moderate order volume and transaction value. The 4.7 rating supports a positive commercial reputation, but the relatively limited number of reviews prevents the business performance from being classified as strongly validated at a high-volume level. Based on the available data, this supplier fits the “stable medium-scale transaction” category rather than the “high-order, high-transaction, high-review” category.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤3h
• Full customization: Available
• ODM service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier reports a response time of within three hours, which is acceptable for international B2B communication but does not meet the highest standard of response within one hour. The availability of Full Customization and ODM service indicates that the supplier can support buyers with non-standard requirements, product adaptation, or project-based sourcing needs.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has solid service capability due to its customization and ODM support. However, the response time is not within the top-tier threshold of one hour or less. Therefore, the service capability should be considered good but not excellent. The available data supports a score in the upper part of the normal-response/customization-capable range.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 66.7%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 66.7%, which is below the 70% threshold. This is the weakest area in the current supplier profile. For buyers purchasing greenhouse structures, hydroponic systems, or related components, delivery reliability can directly affect project installation schedules, seasonal agricultural planning, and downstream customer commitments.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate below 70% should receive below 5 points. Although the supplier performs well in platform credibility and has moderate commercial activity, the delivery metric represents a concrete operational risk. This score reflects the need for strict delivery management, confirmed lead times, written production schedules, and potentially phased shipments.

Final Score

4 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.7
• Reviews: 20+
• Finished Product Inspection: Available
• Verified supplier: True
• Warranty available: Listed

Elaboration

The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.7, which indicates generally satisfactory customer feedback. The availability of Finished Product Inspection and warranty support suggests that basic quality assurance mechanisms are present. Verified supplier status also adds some confidence regarding supplier legitimacy and operational transparency. However, the number of reviews is only 20+, which limits the depth of customer feedback available for quality validation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates good quality-related indicators, particularly through Finished Product Inspection, warranty availability, and a favorable rating. However, the review volume is not large enough to fully validate consistent quality performance across many buyers and order types. The data supports a strong but not top-tier quality score. More evidence would be required for a higher score, such as detailed inspection reports, defect rate data, product certifications, or larger-scale review history.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Jiangsu Skyplant Greenhouse Technology Co., Ltd. is a credible supplier for buyers sourcing greenhouse systems, hydroponic channels, blackout greenhouse solutions, film lock systems, Dutch bucket systems, and electric roll-up units, based strictly on the listed product data. The supplier is especially suitable for buyers who value platform credibility, Trade Assurance protection, customization capability, and moderate transaction validation.

However, the main risk is delivery reliability, as the reported on-time delivery rate is only 66.7%. Buyers should avoid immediate large-volume orders without prior validation. A trial order or phased procurement approach is recommended, with written confirmation of lead time, shipment schedule, inspection requirements, and penalty or contingency terms where applicable.

The supplier shows growth potential due to its long presence, verified status, customization capability, and moderate recent transaction volume. If delivery performance improves, it could become a stronger long-term sourcing partner.