zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shanghai Zaoye Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shanghai Zaoye Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shanghai, offering prefab container house products including 20FT container houses, luxury prefab container houses, extendable villa-style units, and modular portable containers. The supplier shows a moderate operational base with a reported factory area of 9,000+㎡, 30+ staff, and verified supplier status. Platform credibility is supported by Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and service/quality-related tags such as finished product inspection, ODM service, project solutions, and on-site installation. However, its Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, and customer feedback data is weak, with no available store rating and 0 reviews. Business activity exists, with 10+ orders and CN¥540.9K+ transaction value over the past six months, but buyer validation remains limited. This supplier is more suitable for trial orders, small-to-medium prefab housing projects, or buyers requiring low MOQ procurement, provided that buyers conduct specification confirmation and pre-shipment quality checks.

Shanghai Zaoye Engineering Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Company name: Shanghai Zaoye Engineering Technology Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Shanghai, China
  • Factory area: 9,000+㎡
  • Employees: 30+ staff
  • Verified supplier / factory verification status: True
  • Product focus: Prefab container houses and modular portable container units

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported factory area of over 9,000㎡, which indicates a reasonable physical production or operational base for prefab container housing products. The employee count of 30+ staff suggests that the company is not a large-scale manufacturing group, but it appears to have a basic organizational structure capable of handling production, sales, and project-related services. The presence of verified supplier status adds credibility to its company profile, although the provided data does not specify the detailed verification scope, audit standard, production line capacity, annual output, equipment list, or specific factory certifications.

The product range shown is concentrated around prefab container houses, including 20FT units, 40FT/20FT extendable units, and modular portable container products. This focused product structure suggests specialization within the modular building/container housing category, but the available data is insufficient to confirm large-scale production capacity or advanced engineering capability.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates a moderate factory foundation due to its 9,000+㎡ factory area and verified supplier status. However, the workforce size of 30+ staff is relatively limited, and there is no detailed information about production lines, machinery, annual capacity, quality certifications, or large-scale project execution records. Therefore, it should not be rated as a large-scale stable supply chain. It is more appropriately positioned as a small-to-medium supplier with basic production capability and some verification support.

Final Score

14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / industry tags:
  • Project solutions
  • On-site installation
  • Finished product inspection
  • ODM service available

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status and Trade Assurance support. Trade Assurance is particularly relevant for international buyers because it provides a platform-based transaction protection mechanism. The verified supplier status also strengthens basic credibility, though the data does not specify whether this verification includes factory audit details, production capacity assessment, or third-party inspection documentation.

The certification and service tags are useful but should be interpreted carefully. “Finished product inspection” indicates a quality control-related capability, while “ODM service available” suggests some level of design or customization support. “Project solutions” and “on-site installation” are relevant for prefab container housing buyers, but the provided data does not include details on project scale, geographic service coverage, installation team size, or past project references.

The main limitation is the short Gold Supplier history of only 1 year. This means the supplier has platform credibility, but not yet a long-term track record.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform trust elements: Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and several relevant operational tags. However, the Gold Supplier tenure is short, and the data does not include detailed factory audit documents, internationally recognized certifications, or long-term platform transaction history. As a result, the credibility level is solid but not mature enough for a top-tier score.

Final Score

15 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 10+
  • Transaction amount in the past 6 months: CN¥540.9K+
  • Store rating: Insufficient Data
  • Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded commercial activity on the platform, with more than 10 orders and over CN¥540.9K in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates that the company has received actual buyer orders and has generated measurable transaction volume. For prefab container houses, where unit values can be relatively high, the transaction value is meaningful, but the order count remains limited.

The main weakness is the absence of customer feedback. The store rating field is blank, and the review count is 0. This limits the ability to evaluate buyer satisfaction, repeat purchase confidence, dispute history, or product acceptance after delivery. The transaction data confirms some business activity, but not enough to establish strong market validation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a certain level of recent transaction performance, supported by CN¥540.9K+ in six-month transaction value. However, the order quantity of 10+ is not high, and the lack of store rating and customer reviews significantly weakens commercial credibility. The business performance is therefore above a completely unverified supplier but still below a stable, well-reviewed, high-volume supplier.

Final Score

11 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤2h
  • ODM service available: True, based on platform tag
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data
  • Other service-related tags: Project solutions, on-site installation

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported response time of within 2 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for international procurement inquiries. This is positive for buyers who require quotation clarification, product specification discussion, and project coordination. The platform tag “ODM service available” also suggests that the supplier may provide some design or product adaptation support.

However, the data does not explicitly confirm “Full Customization.” ODM is not identical to full customization, and the scope of ODM service is not described. There is also no data on quotation speed, engineering drawing support, multilingual service capability, after-sales process, or installation response coverage. The tags “project solutions” and “on-site installation” are favorable, but without details, they should be treated as supporting indicators rather than confirmed comprehensive service capability.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows a normal-to-good service foundation, mainly due to the ≤2h response time and ODM-related tag. However, it does not meet the strongest service tier because response time is not within ≤1 hour, and full customization capability is not confirmed. The service capability is suitable for standard inquiries and potentially customized discussions, but buyers should confirm technical service scope before placing complex project orders.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. For prefab container houses and modular building products, delivery reliability is important because project timelines often depend on coordinated shipping, installation schedules, and site preparation.

However, the provided data does not include the number of deliveries used to calculate this rate, the shipment destinations, logistics methods, or whether the on-time rate is based on platform-recorded orders only. Therefore, while the metric is excellent, its statistical depth cannot be fully evaluated.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the reported rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score in this dimension. The only caution is that the dataset does not show the delivery sample size, but the available metric itself is fully positive.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Finished product inspection: True, based on platform tag
  • Verified supplier / factory verification status: True
  • Store rating: Insufficient Data
  • Number of reviews: 0
  • On-time delivery rate: 100.0%, indirectly supportive but not a direct quality indicator

Elaboration

The supplier has quality-related platform indicators, especially the “Finished product inspection” tag and verified supplier status. These suggest that some level of inspection or verification mechanism exists. For prefab container houses, finished product inspection is important because buyers need confirmation of structure, dimensions, materials, fittings, doors, windows, insulation, and overall assembly condition before shipment.

However, the customer feedback side is weak. The store rating is not provided, and the review count is 0. This means there is no visible buyer feedback to validate product quality, installation experience, durability, packaging quality, or after-sales handling. Additionally, the data does not include product test reports, ISO certification, structural compliance documents, material certificates, or third-party inspection records.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has basic quality assurance indicators through finished product inspection and verified supplier status, which prevents it from being scored as completely unverified. However, the lack of customer reviews and missing store rating create a significant information gap. Since buyer-side quality validation is unavailable, the supplier cannot be rated in the higher quality tiers. A cautious mid-low score is appropriate.

Final Score

12 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 14 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 15 / 20
Business Performance 11 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 12 / 20
Total Score 69 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation recommended for trial orders or controlled procurement.

Shanghai Zaoye Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers seeking prefab container houses with low MOQ requirements, as all listed products show a minimum order quantity of 1 set. The supplier may be appropriate for small-to-medium projects, sample purchases, pilot housing projects, temporary accommodation solutions, or buyers who need container house products with platform transaction protection through Trade Assurance.

However, buyers should proceed carefully due to several risks:

  1. Limited customer feedback: Store rating is unavailable and review count is 0.
  2. Short platform history: Gold Supplier duration is only 1 year.
  3. Moderate company scale: 9,000+㎡ factory area is positive, but 30+ staff suggests limited manpower compared with larger manufacturers.
  4. Customization scope unclear: ODM service is listed, but Full Customization is Insufficient Data.
  5. Quality documentation not fully visible: Finished product inspection is listed, but detailed certificates, test reports, and compliance documents are Insufficient Data.

Suggested procurement approach: Start with a small trial order or sample project, use Trade Assurance, request detailed drawings/specifications, confirm materials and configuration in writing, require finished product inspection evidence before shipment, and consider third-party inspection for larger-value orders.

Growth potential: The supplier has a focused prefab container house product line, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, 100% reported on-time delivery, and measurable recent transaction value. If it builds more customer reviews, expands platform history, and provides stronger quality documentation, its procurement attractiveness could improve.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shanghai Starway Engineering & Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Starway Engineering & Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Rong Tai Biochemical Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Rong Tai Biochemical Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Minran Refrigerating Engineering Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Minran Refrigerating Engineering Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Huaao Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Huaao Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Jiangteng Environmental Protection Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Jiangteng Environmental Protection Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Puliweite Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Puliweite Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wincoo Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wincoo Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Boyang Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Boyang Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Cenmade Laser Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Cenmade Laser Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Huilin Digital Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Huilin Digital Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Kouyi Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Kouyi Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lixin Adhesive Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lixin Adhesive Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Senraise Intelligence Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Senraise Intelligence Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Twinjet Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Twinjet Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wanling Water Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wanling Water Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Kelrosa Health Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Kelrosa Health Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Ctp Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Ctp Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Taka Architectural Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Taka Architectural Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Fd Seals Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Fd Seals Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenyang Ms Office Furniture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenyang Ms Office Furniture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Chongqing Wangdeng Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Wangdeng Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Pinzhu New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Pinzhu New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cixi Hoto Metallic Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cixi Hoto Metallic Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Saiyang Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Saiyang Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chaozhou Daxin Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chaozhou Daxin Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Boyeezon Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Boyeezon Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huzhou Linggao Elevator Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huzhou Linggao Elevator Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Puqi Geologic Exploration Equipment Institute (Common Partnership) Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Puqi Geologic Exploration Equipment Institute (Common Partnership) Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Yineng Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Yineng Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Epowsens Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Epowsens Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Lituo Imp & Exp Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Lituo Imp & Exp Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Henglicai Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Henglicai Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Honglai Stainless Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Honglai Stainless Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Mengli Electrical Appliance Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Mengli Electrical Appliance Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Goal Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Goal Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jingzhou Syntek Smart Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jingzhou Syntek Smart Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Moonbay Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Moonbay Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Xingbang Kitchen And Bathroom Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Xingbang Kitchen And Bathroom Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingyu Electronics (Ningbo) Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Xingyu Electronics (Ningbo) Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Topwell Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Topwell Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026