zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shanghai Kouyi Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shanghai Kouyi Technology Development Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shanghai, with a reported factory area of 3,100+㎡ and 30+ staff. The supplier appears to focus on in-stock sewing thread-related products, offering multiple low-MOQ items, including ready-to-ship options with MOQs as low as 1 piece. Its platform profile shows strong credibility indicators, including 7 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, finished product inspection, warranty availability, and a reported on-time delivery rate of 97.2%. Commercial performance is also relatively solid, with 200+ orders and CN¥1M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.9 store rating and 30+ reviews.

This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume sourcing, sample-based purchasing, fast-moving in-stock items, and relatively low procurement risk through Trade Assurance. However, information on deeper factory certifications, production capacity, customization capability, and export market experience is insufficient.

Shanghai Kouyi Technology Development Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company name: Shanghai Kouyi Technology Development Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Shanghai, China
  • Factory area: 3,100+㎡
  • Employees: 30+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Product listings indicate in-stock and ready-to-ship sewing thread-related products
  • Factory certifications beyond supplier verification: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a clearly stated physical production or operating base with a factory area of over 3,100㎡ and more than 30 employees. This suggests a small-to-medium operational scale rather than a large industrial manufacturing base. The company appears capable of handling regular stock-based orders, especially because several listed products are described as “in stock” or “ready to ship.”

The presence of verified supplier status provides some credibility regarding the company’s existence and platform-level verification. However, the provided data does not include detailed production line numbers, monthly output, machinery capacity, quality management certifications, or internationally recognized factory audit reports. Therefore, while the supplier demonstrates basic production and fulfillment capability, the available data does not support classification as a large-scale or highly certified manufacturing operation.

Scoring Rationale

A factory size of 3,100+㎡ and 30+ staff indicates a functioning production or supply operation with basic stability. The company is stronger than a very small trader or unverified seller because it has a declared facility and verified supplier status. However, the workforce size and lack of disclosed advanced factory certifications limit the score. Based on the available information, the supplier fits best within the “small but with basic production capability” to lower “medium stable factory” range.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / platform tags:
  • Warranty available
  • Finished product inspection
  • On-time delivery 97.2%
  • Response time ≤2h

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates strong platform credibility. A 7-year Gold Supplier history indicates a relatively long operating record on compared with newly registered suppliers. Trade Assurance support is important for buyers because it provides a structured transaction protection mechanism through the platform.

The supplier also has several compliance and service-related tags, including warranty availability, finished product inspection, and documented on-time delivery performance. These indicators strengthen buyer confidence, especially for overseas or remote sourcing where direct factory visits may not be practical.

However, the data does not include specific third-party management system certifications, such as ISO certification, product compliance documents, or export compliance documentation. Therefore, the platform credibility is strong, but broader compliance depth cannot be fully confirmed.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 7 years Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and multiple platform tags represents a highly credible supplier profile. The supplier meets most major platform-based trust requirements. The only reason the score is not a perfect 20 is that the provided data does not show detailed independent certifications beyond platform verification and product inspection tags.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 200+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥1M+
  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Reviews: 30+

Elaboration

The supplier has generated more than 200 orders over the past six months, with a transaction value exceeding CN¥1M. This indicates that the store has active commercial traction and is not merely a passive listing account. The order quantity suggests steady demand, especially for low-MOQ and in-stock products.

The 4.9 store rating is strong and indicates generally positive buyer satisfaction. However, the review count of 30+ is moderate rather than large. While the transaction data supports a reliable level of business activity, the number of reviews is still not high enough to confirm broad customer validation across many buyer types or markets.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows stable commercial performance through 200+ recent orders and CN¥1M+ transaction value. These figures are meaningful for small-to-medium procurement needs. The high 4.9 rating supports a positive performance record, but the review base remains limited at 30+, which slightly reduces the strength of validation. Overall, the supplier fits the “stable medium-scale transaction” category rather than the highest-volume category.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Response time: ≤2h
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data
  • Communication efficiency: supported by response time data only
  • Product listings include low MOQ and ready-to-ship options

Elaboration

The supplier’s stated response time of within 2 hours indicates a reasonably efficient communication process. This is suitable for buyers who require timely quotation handling, stock confirmation, order coordination, or sample arrangement.

The product listings also show low MOQ options, including 1-piece minimum order quantities on several items. This suggests flexibility for sampling or small-batch purchasing. However, the data does not state whether the supplier supports full customization, private labeling, OEM, ODM, customized packaging, or color/material development beyond the listed stock product range. Therefore, service capability can be assessed as responsive and practical for standard purchasing, but customization strength cannot be confirmed.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s response time is good, but not within the highest benchmark of ≤1 hour. Since full customization capability is not provided, the supplier cannot be scored in the top range for service capability. The available data supports a normal-to-good service level for standard inquiries and stock-based sourcing.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 97.2%

Elaboration

The supplier reports an on-time delivery rate of 97.2%, which is a strong indicator of delivery reliability. This performance level is above the 90% threshold required for the highest scoring range. For buyers sourcing ready-to-ship or in-stock items, this delivery record is especially relevant because timely dispatch is a key purchasing factor.

The data does not include average lead time, international shipping experience, urgent order handling capability, or historical delay reasons. However, based strictly on the provided on-time delivery percentage, the supplier demonstrates strong fulfillment reliability.

Scoring Rationale

With an on-time delivery rate of 97.2%, the supplier qualifies for the top delivery performance range. The score reflects strong platform-recorded dispatch reliability. No deduction is necessary under the provided scoring rule because the rate is clearly above 90%.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Reviews: 30+
  • Finished product inspection: Yes
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Warranty available: Yes
  • Factory Verification: indicated as verified supplier
  • Additional product quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9, which indicates positive customer feedback. The presence of finished product inspection is an important quality assurance indicator, suggesting that some level of inspection is applied before shipment. Warranty availability further supports after-sales confidence.

The supplier is also marked as verified, which adds credibility to its quality and operational claims at the platform level. However, the review volume is only 30+, which is acceptable but not extensive. The data also does not include defect rates, return rates, product test reports, material certifications, or third-party quality management system certifications. Therefore, quality assurance appears solid at the platform level, but deeper technical quality validation remains insufficient.

Scoring Rationale

The high 4.9 rating, finished product inspection, warranty availability, and verified supplier status justify a strong quality score. However, the limited review count and absence of detailed product compliance or quality certification data prevent the supplier from reaching the highest score band. The supplier is best assessed as having good basic quality assurance with moderate customer validation.

Final Score

17 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 13 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 17 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 17 / 20
Total Score 83 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, especially for small-to-medium volume and stock-based purchasing.

Shanghai Kouyi Technology Development Co., Ltd. is a suitable supplier for buyers seeking ready-to-ship sewing thread-related products, low MOQ purchasing, trial orders, sample procurement, and stable -protected transactions. Its strongest advantages are platform credibility, 7-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, 97.2% on-time delivery, finished product inspection, and solid recent transaction performance.

Suitable customer types include:
- Small and medium-sized buyers
- E-commerce sellers
- Buyers requiring low MOQ or sample orders
- Distributors sourcing in-stock products
- Buyers prioritizing Trade Assurance and timely delivery

Main risk points:
- Factory scale is moderate, with only 30+ staff disclosed
- Full customization capability: Insufficient Data
- Detailed production capacity: Insufficient Data
- International certifications or product compliance documents: Insufficient Data
- Review count is moderate rather than extensive

Growth potential:
The supplier shows good platform maturity and stable recent transaction activity. If it can provide more detailed factory audit documents, production capacity data, customization capability evidence, and product compliance certifications, it could become more suitable for larger-volume or brand-level procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shanghai Twinjet Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Twinjet Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Feiyan Industrial Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Feiyan Industrial Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Flying New Material Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Flying New Material Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wistino Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wistino Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sunivision Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sunivision Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Huanxin Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Huanxin Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jinxiang Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jinxiang Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lianping Gaoxun Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lianping Gaoxun Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Greencolor Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Greencolor Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Zhixiang Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Zhixiang Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wenhui Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wenhui Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Hanbo Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Hanbo Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sihuiwei (Donggguan) Technology Development Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Sihuiwei (Donggguan) Technology Development Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Zhongmei Shenhai Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Zhongmei Shenhai Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Lizhong Huihe Technology And Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Lizhong Huihe Technology And Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan King Rabbit Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan King Rabbit Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Red Sea Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Red Sea Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Rongxin Electronic Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Rongxin Electronic Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Baotou City Guixin Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Baotou City Guixin Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Busy Man Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Busy Man Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Nanjing Shangchao Shidai Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Shangchao Shidai Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Helida Grain Selecting Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Helida Grain Selecting Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Yu. Pooling Wisdom Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Yu. Pooling Wisdom Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Ouliwei Machinery Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Ouliwei Machinery Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Cowint New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Cowint New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Baile Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Baile Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Xiangling Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Xiangling Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Global Power Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Global Power Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Qiao Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Qiao Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yongkang Suoren Electric Appliances Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Yongkang Suoren Electric Appliances Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Congben Vehicle Fittings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Congben Vehicle Fittings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Babidou Toys And Gifts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Babidou Toys And Gifts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Manka Ceramic Culture Development Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Manka Ceramic Culture Development Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Novi Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Novi Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Junfei New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Junfei New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Feida Machine Tool Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Feida Machine Tool Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Pari Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Pari Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Baogong Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Baogong Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hongli Adhesive Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hongli Adhesive Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen United Foison Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen United Foison Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026