Shanghai Boyang Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shanghai Boyang Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based packaging supplier located in Shanghai, with a reported factory area of 6,000+ sqm and 30+ staff. The company focuses on poly plastic courier and packaging products, including RTS and customizable poly material courier sacks, with MOQs ranging from 1,000 to 50,000 pieces. Its profile shows a 2-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, supplier verification, response time within 2 hours, and an on-time delivery rate of 93.7%. In the past six months, the supplier recorded 200+ orders and CN¥2.3M+ transaction value, supported by a 4.8 store rating and 30+ reviews. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking small to medium-volume procurement of poly courier packaging with verified platform credibility and solid delivery reliability. Key limitations include limited employee scale, relatively short Gold Supplier history, and insufficient data on full customization capability and finished product inspection systems.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Shanghai, China
- Factory area: 6,000+ sqm
- Employees: 30+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a clearly stated physical factory scale of over 6,000 sqm, which indicates a tangible production base rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. However, the reported employee count of 30+ staff suggests a relatively lean workforce. This scale is more consistent with a small-to-medium packaging manufacturer rather than a large-scale industrial supplier. The verified supplier status provides additional credibility regarding the existence and basic operating profile of the company.

Scoring Rationale
The factory area is reasonably strong for a packaging supplier, but the limited staff size prevents it from being classified as a large-scale stable supply chain. The available data supports basic to moderate production capability, but does not provide enough evidence of extensive production lines, high automation, or large workforce capacity. Therefore, the supplier fits best within the medium-stability range, though closer to the lower side of that band.

Final Score
15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry labels: “Response time ≤2h”, “On-time delivery 93.7%”

Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification. These factors reduce basic sourcing risk and provide buyers with a more structured procurement channel. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 2 years, which is relatively short compared with long-established suppliers on the platform. The listed labels mainly relate to service speed and delivery performance rather than broader factory certifications or product compliance certifications.

Scoring Rationale
Core platform credibility elements are present, including Gold Supplier membership, Trade Assurance, and verification. This supports a credible platform profile. However, the short Gold Supplier duration and absence of additional disclosed factory certifications, product compliance certifications, or detailed audit documentation limit the score. The supplier demonstrates acceptable but not yet long-term platform maturity.

Final Score
16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 200+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥2.3M+
- Store rating: 4.8
- Reviews: 30+

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded more than 200 orders and over CN¥2.3M in transaction value during the past six months, showing active commercial performance on the platform. A 4.8 store rating indicates positive buyer satisfaction, while 30+ reviews provide some degree of customer feedback validation. The transaction volume appears solid for a supplier of low-unit-price packaging products, although the review count is not large enough to represent extensive buyer validation.

Scoring Rationale
The order count and transaction value show stable business activity rather than limited or unproven sales. The store rating is strong, but the number of reviews remains moderate. This combination supports a score in the stable medium-to-good range. The supplier does not reach the highest score band because the review base is still relatively small and the data does not show very high-volume or long-term transaction history.

Final Score
16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
- Product listings include customizable courier packaging references

Elaboration
The supplier’s stated response time of within 2 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of within 1 hour. Several product titles include customization-related wording, such as “Custom” and “Customizable,” but the provided data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability. Therefore, customization strength cannot be fully verified from the available information.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates good response speed and appears to offer custom packaging products based on product descriptions. However, because Full Customization is not explicitly confirmed, the service capability cannot be scored in the highest band. The supplier is suitable for buyers requiring normal communication efficiency and likely basic customization discussion, but further confirmation is needed for complex OEM/ODM requirements.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 93.7%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 93.7% is above the 90% threshold, indicating reliable delivery performance based on the provided platform data. This is especially relevant for packaging products, where delivery consistency is important for e-commerce sellers, logistics users, and repeat procurement buyers.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring framework, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. The supplier’s 93.7% rate is comfortably above the threshold, but not close enough to perfect delivery performance to justify the maximum score. It demonstrates strong delivery reliability with some remaining room for improvement.

Final Score
9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.8
- Reviews: 30+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Supplier verification is stated as True

Elaboration
The supplier has a strong store rating of 4.8 and more than 30 reviews, indicating generally positive customer feedback. Supplier verification adds some confidence to the company profile. However, the review volume is moderate rather than extensive, and the data does not confirm whether Finished Product Inspection is available. No specific product quality certifications, inspection reports, or defect-rate data are provided.

Scoring Rationale
The high rating supports a positive quality perception, but the limited review count and lack of confirmed Finished Product Inspection prevent a higher score. Factory or supplier verification provides basic assurance, but it is not equivalent to a complete quality control system. The supplier appears to have acceptable quality feedback, but further inspection and sample validation would be necessary before large-scale procurement.

Final Score
15 / 20

Total Score

78 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Shanghai Boyang Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. is recommended for conditional cooperation, especially for buyers sourcing poly courier bags, plastic packaging sacks, and related lightweight packaging products at small to medium order volumes. The supplier shows credible platform backing, active recent transaction performance, strong on-time delivery, and a positive 4.8 store rating.

The supplier is most suitable for e-commerce packaging buyers, trading companies, logistics packaging purchasers, and brands requiring standard or moderately customized poly courier packaging. For large-volume or highly customized procurement, buyers should request additional confirmation on production capacity, customization scope, inspection process, and quality control procedures.

Main risk points include the relatively small employee base, only 2 years of Gold Supplier history, moderate review count, and insufficient data on Full Customization and Finished Product Inspection. Growth potential is supported by stable recent transaction activity, verified supplier status, and strong delivery performance, but further factory audit details and quality documentation would be needed for strategic long-term supplier qualification.