zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shanghai Forests Packaging Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shanghai Forests Packaging Group Co., Ltd. is a China-based packaging supplier located in Shanghai, with a reported factory area of 23,000+ sqm and 290+ staff. The company appears positioned as a medium-to-large packaging manufacturer serving customized packaging needs, including gift boxes, logo packaging, food-grade material packaging, clothing-related packaging, and recyclable shipping cartons, based strictly on the listed product data. Its profile shows strong platform credibility, including 10 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and several commercial tags such as warranty availability, social responsibility, and low MOQ for customization. Recent business performance is solid, with 90+ orders and CN¥6.4M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.9 store rating and 40+ reviews. The supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking established packaging production capacity, moderate customization flexibility, and reliable delivery performance, while quality-system depth beyond platform verification remains partially insufficient.

Shanghai Forests Packaging Group Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Shanghai, China
- Factory area: 23,000+ sqm
- Employees: 290+ staff
- Verified supplier / factory verification status: True
- Product scope includes gift boxes, custom logo packaging, food-grade material packaging, clothing packaging, and recyclable shipping cartons.

Elaboration
The supplier has a sizable physical production base and workforce, indicating a meaningful manufacturing operation rather than a small trading-only profile. A 23,000+ sqm factory and 290+ employees suggest the company has the basic scale required to manage multiple packaging product categories and handle recurring order flows. The verified supplier status further strengthens confidence that the listed factory information has some platform-level validation. However, the data does not provide detailed production lines, monthly capacity, equipment lists, export markets, or factory audit reports beyond the stated verification status.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier qualifies as a medium-to-large stable factory based on factory size, staff count, and verified status. The scale is stronger than a small production workshop and supports a stable manufacturing profile. However, without detailed capacity data, machinery information, or third-party factory audit documentation, it should not receive a perfect score reserved for highly transparent large-scale supply chains.

Final Score
18 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 10 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry tags: Warranty available, Socially responsible, Low MOQ for customization

Elaboration
The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. A 10-year Gold Supplier record indicates long-term platform presence, while Trade Assurance provides transaction-level protection for buyers. Verified supplier status adds another credibility layer. The listed tags also indicate certain commercial and compliance-related positioning, including warranty availability and social responsibility. However, the data does not include specific formal certifications such as ISO, FSC, BSCI, SEDEX, or food-contact compliance certificates, so certification completeness cannot be fully confirmed.

Scoring Rationale
The combination of long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status supports a high credibility score. The platform trust signals are complete and mature. The score is not full because the provided data contains only general tags rather than detailed named certifications or uploaded compliance documents.

Final Score
19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past six months: 90+
- Transaction value in the past six months: CN¥6.4M+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 40+

Elaboration
The supplier shows active recent transaction performance. More than 90 orders over six months indicates consistent buyer activity, while CN¥6.4M+ transaction value suggests a commercially meaningful sales volume. A 4.9 rating is strong and implies positive buyer satisfaction among available reviewers. The review count of 40+ provides some validation, though it is not extremely large relative to the transaction volume, so buyer feedback depth is moderate rather than extensive.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates stable and credible business activity with strong transaction value, solid order volume, and a high rating. This supports a high score. The score is slightly below the maximum because the review base is moderate, and the data does not provide repeat purchase rate, buyer geographic distribution, dispute rate, or product-specific sales breakdown.

Final Score
18 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤5h
- Customization-related tag: Low MOQ for customization
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
A response time of five hours or less is acceptable for international B2B communication, although it is not within the strongest service benchmark of one hour or less. The “Low MOQ for customization” tag indicates some level of customization support, and several listed products include custom logo or customized packaging descriptions. However, the data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability, design support, sample lead time, account management, language support, or after-sales process.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier appears to have basic-to-good service capability, especially for customization-related packaging inquiries, but the response time is not top-tier and Full Customization is not explicitly confirmed. Therefore, the score should remain in the normal service-capability range rather than the highest range.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The reported on-time delivery rate is excellent and directly supports confidence in delivery reliability. A 100.0% rate meets the highest scoring band under the evaluation standard. However, the data does not provide shipment volume behind the percentage, average lead time, urgent-order handling ability, or historical delivery consistency across longer periods.

Scoring Rationale
Based on the available delivery metric, the supplier deserves a top delivery score. The absence of shipment-volume context prevents deeper analysis, but the stated on-time delivery rate fully satisfies the highest criterion.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 40+
- Verified supplier / factory verification: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Formal quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The 4.9 store rating indicates strong buyer satisfaction, and 40+ reviews provide a reasonable but not extensive feedback base. Verified supplier status contributes to quality confidence because it indicates some degree of platform validation. However, there is no explicit data confirming Finished Product Inspection, quality-control procedures, defect rate, product testing, food-grade compliance certificates, or packaging material certifications. Since some listed products reference food-grade material and recyclable cartons, the absence of supporting compliance documentation should be treated as a data gap rather than an assumed weakness.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has good customer feedback and verified status, supporting a solid quality score. However, the quality assurance system is not fully evidenced because Finished Product Inspection and formal quality certifications are not provided. The score reflects strong buyer ratings but limited documented quality-system transparency.

Final Score
16 / 20

Total Score

88 / 100

  • Company Strength: 18 / 20
  • Platform & Compliance Credibility: 19 / 20
  • Business Performance: 18 / 20
  • Service Capability: 7 / 10
  • Delivery Performance: 10 / 10
  • Quality & Customer Feedback: 16 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Shanghai Forests Packaging Group Co., Ltd. is recommended for cooperation, especially for buyers seeking established packaging suppliers with verified platform credibility, stable transaction history, strong delivery performance, and moderate-to-low MOQ customization options. The supplier appears suitable for gift packaging, custom logo packaging, clothing packaging, food-related packaging inquiries, and recyclable carton sourcing, based only on the listed product information.

The main procurement risks are the lack of explicit data on Full Customization capability, Finished Product Inspection, formal quality certifications, detailed production capacity, and product-specific compliance documents. For buyers purchasing food-grade or sustainability-related packaging, additional document verification is recommended before placing large or compliance-sensitive orders.

Overall, the supplier shows strong growth potential due to its factory scale, 10-year Gold Supplier history, CN¥6.4M+ recent transaction value, high store rating, and 100.0% on-time delivery rate. A pilot order or sample-based qualification process is advisable before scaling to long-term bulk procurement.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shenzhen M-Star Packaging Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen M-Star Packaging Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Boyang Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Boyang Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Kmcable Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Kmcable Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Huijue Technologies Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Huijue Technologies Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jixiang Building Materials Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jixiang Building Materials Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Qianxun Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Qianxun Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Dingjin Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Dingjin Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuyun Packaging (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuyun Packaging (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Gongying Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Gongying Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Xiangnian Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Xiangnian Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ishine Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ishine Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Fuhan Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Fuhan Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guangyuanda Printing And Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guangyuanda Printing And Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jiahe Packaging Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jiahe Packaging Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Datianxia Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Datianxia Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Poma Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Poma Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xingkaihua Printing Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xingkaihua Printing Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhenghong (Shenzhen) Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhenghong (Shenzhen) Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yuehong Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yuehong Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Moon Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Moon Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Henan Be Focus Mechanical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Be Focus Mechanical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wanjia Xiandai Electron Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wanjia Xiandai Electron Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Zoetic Outdoor Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Zoetic Outdoor Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Xieyuan Gifts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Xieyuan Gifts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Broad Clean Air Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Broad Clean Air Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenyang Ms Office Furniture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenyang Ms Office Furniture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Hibong Industrial Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Hibong Industrial Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jingxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jingxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Boya Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Boya Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yilian Photoelectric Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yilian Photoelectric Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Hanmingya Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Hanmingya Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Winchoice Imp/Exp Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Winchoice Imp/Exp Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiake (Chongqing) Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiake (Chongqing) Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Dorlin Electric Vehicle Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Dorlin Electric Vehicle Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Cairun Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Cairun Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Kare Houseware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Kare Houseware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jianghe New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jianghe New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Gaojie Model Design And Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Gaojie Model Design And Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jieyang Denixi Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jieyang Denixi Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jingda Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jingda Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026