zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shandong Jiahe Packaging Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Shandong Jiahe Packaging Machinery Co., Ltd.

Shandong Jiahe Packaging Machinery Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Shandong Jiahe Packaging Machinery Co., Ltd. is a China-based packaging machinery supplier located in Shandong, with a reported factory area of 900+㎡ and 10+ staff. The company offers small and semi-automatic packaging-related equipment, including sealing, filling, vacuum packaging, and related machinery, with low minimum order quantities of 1 piece or 1 set, making it suitable for small-batch buyers, distributors, trial orders, and SMEs seeking entry-level or semi-automatic packaging solutions. On , the supplier has 3 years of Gold Supplier status, supports Trade Assurance, and is listed as a verified supplier. Its recent commercial performance is relatively solid, with 200+ orders and CN¥1.8M+ transaction value over the past six months. Delivery performance is strong, with a 96.6% on-time delivery rate. However, the company’s small factory scale, limited workforce, absence of disclosed customization capability, and lack of Finished Product Inspection data create some procurement risk for buyers requiring large-scale production, complex customization, or stricter quality assurance systems.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Factory location: Shandong, China
  • Factory area: 900+㎡
  • Employee count: 10+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Product scope includes semi-automatic sealing, filling, vacuum packaging, and related packaging machinery.

Elaboration

The supplier has a defined physical factory presence with a reported area of over 900 square meters and more than 10 employees. This indicates that the company has basic in-house operational capacity, but the scale is relatively small compared with larger industrial machinery manufacturers. The product portfolio shows a focus on small and semi-automatic packaging machinery, which aligns with the company’s factory and workforce scale.

The supplier being marked as a verified supplier provides some level of credibility regarding its operational existence and business identity. However, the available data does not show evidence of large-scale production lines, advanced manufacturing capacity, high employee count, or internationally recognized factory certifications beyond the supplier verification status.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic manufacturing and supply capability, supported by a physical factory, a small team, and supplier verification. However, the relatively limited factory area and workforce suggest that it is better positioned as a small-scale or niche packaging machinery supplier rather than a large-volume industrial manufacturer. The verification status improves confidence, but the lack of detailed production capacity data prevents a higher score.

Final Score

12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 3 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Listed certification/industry tags:
  • On-time delivery 96.6%
  • Response time ≤2h

Elaboration

The supplier has a clear platform presence with Gold Supplier status for 3 years. It also supports Trade Assurance, which provides transaction protection for buyers on the platform. The supplier verification status further strengthens platform credibility, indicating that or a relevant verification process has checked certain supplier information.

The platform tags show operational performance indicators, including on-time delivery and response time. These are useful for assessing supplier reliability on . However, the provided data does not include broader certification details such as ISO, CE, or industry-specific compliance certifications. Therefore, while platform credibility is reasonably strong, the compliance documentation appears incomplete based on the available information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has several core trust signals: Gold Supplier status, 3-year platform history, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification. These are meaningful credibility indicators for online procurement. However, 3 years is a moderate platform history rather than a long-established record, and the absence of detailed product or factory compliance certifications limits the score from reaching the highest range.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 200+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥1.8M+
  • Store rating: 4.5
  • Number of reviews: 50+

Elaboration

The supplier has achieved more than 200 orders and over CN¥1.8 million in transaction value during the past six months. This shows active commercial traction on the platform and indicates that the supplier has been able to convert buyer interest into actual transactions. The order volume is meaningful, especially considering the machinery category, where individual order values may be higher than low-value consumer goods.

The store rating of 4.5 is acceptable but not exceptionally high. The supplier also has more than 50 reviews, which provides some level of customer feedback visibility, though the review base is not large enough to be considered highly mature or deeply validated. Overall, the business performance demonstrates stable recent activity but does not fully qualify as a top-tier, high-volume, highly rated supplier.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s 200+ recent orders and CN¥1.8M+ transaction value show a solid level of business validation. The review count supports market activity, but the 4.5 rating is moderate rather than outstanding. This suggests a commercially active supplier with proven demand, but not one with sufficient evidence to be classified as a top-performing platform seller.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Response time: ≤2h
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data
  • Communication efficiency: Indicated by platform response time tag only

Elaboration

The supplier’s listed response time of ≤2 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for online procurement. This level of responsiveness is useful for quotation requests, order confirmation, and basic after-sales communication. However, the available data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM, ODM, private labeling, engineering customization, or special technical modifications.

For machinery procurement, customization capability can be important, especially for buyers requiring equipment adjustments based on packaging size, production speed, material type, or factory layout. Since no such customization data is provided, the supplier should be considered to have verified basic communication responsiveness but unverified advanced service capability.

Scoring Rationale

The response time is strong but does not meet the highest criterion of ≤1 hour. More importantly, there is no data confirming Full Customization or advanced technical service capability. Therefore, the supplier earns a mid-level service score based on responsive communication, while losing points due to insufficient customization information.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 96.6%

Elaboration

The supplier reports an on-time delivery rate of 96.6%, which is above the 90% benchmark for strong delivery performance. This indicates that the supplier has generally been able to ship orders within agreed timelines on the platform. For machinery procurement, timely delivery is important because equipment delays can affect production planning, installation schedules, and downstream operational readiness.

The provided data does not include average lead time, shipping regions, logistics partners, or historical delay reasons. Therefore, the delivery assessment is based strictly on the disclosed on-time delivery rate.

Scoring Rationale

A 96.6% on-time delivery rate falls clearly within the highest scoring range. This suggests reliable fulfillment performance based on available platform data. Although more logistics details would improve confidence, the disclosed metric supports a strong score.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.5
  • Reviews: 50+
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: Supplier verification is marked as True

Elaboration

The supplier has a store rating of 4.5 and more than 50 reviews, indicating that buyers have provided a moderate amount of feedback. The rating is generally positive but not at the premium level. For machinery products, a 4.5 rating suggests acceptable customer satisfaction, but it also leaves room for concern compared with suppliers rated closer to 4.8 or above.

The supplier verification status supports a basic level of quality credibility because the supplier’s identity and factory-related information have been verified to some extent. However, there is no disclosed evidence of Finished Product Inspection, product testing protocols, third-party inspection reports, or formal quality management certifications. This limits the ability to fully assess quality assurance depth.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has reasonable customer feedback volume and an acceptable rating, along with verified supplier status. These factors support a moderate-to-good quality confidence level. However, the lack of Finished Product Inspection data and absence of detailed quality control certifications prevent a higher score. Buyers should conduct product-specific inspections or request additional QC documentation before placing larger orders.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 12 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 16 / 20
Business Performance 16 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 15 / 20
Total Score 76 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Shandong Jiahe Packaging Machinery Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking small to medium-scale packaging machinery, semi-automatic equipment, trial purchases, low-MOQ procurement, and platform-protected transactions through Trade Assurance. The supplier’s key strengths are its verified supplier status, 3-year Gold Supplier record, active recent transaction history, 200+ orders in six months, CN¥1.8M+ transaction value, and strong 96.6% on-time delivery rate.

However, buyers should note several risk points. The company has a relatively small factory scale, with 900+㎡ and 10+ staff. There is also insufficient data regarding Full Customization, Finished Product Inspection, formal quality certifications, and detailed production capacity. For buyers requiring high-volume manufacturing, complex engineering customization, or strict compliance documentation, additional due diligence is necessary.

Recommended actions before procurement include requesting product videos, technical specifications, spare parts details, warranty terms, inspection records, and pre-shipment inspection support. For first-time buyers, a sample or small trial order is advisable before scaling purchase volume. The supplier shows growth potential in small packaging machinery segments, especially if it can strengthen quality documentation and customization transparency.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Wenzhou Lianteng Packaging Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Lianteng Packaging Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Jiahe Non-Woven Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Jiahe Non-Woven Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
North Machinery (Shandong) Corporation Supplier Evaluation
North Machinery (Shandong) Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Xinleichuang Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Xinleichuang Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Yuanchuan Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Yuanchuan Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Nuote Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Nuote Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Chances Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Chances Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Luwei Machinery Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Luwei Machinery Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sonca Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sonca Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Tobetter Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Tobetter Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Muhe Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Muhe Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Yuntai Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Yuntai Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Lianrun Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Lianrun Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Msang Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Msang Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Shenzong Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Shenzong Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Chengda Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Chengda Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Beijun Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Beijun Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Leite Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Leite Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Powston Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Powston Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Haokun Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Haokun Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Beijing Dazheng Yongye Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Dazheng Yongye Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Raoyang Zerun Metal Wire Mesh Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Raoyang Zerun Metal Wire Mesh Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Trusus Technology (Beijing) Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Trusus Technology (Beijing) Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Anping Corey Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Corey Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ace Architectural Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ace Architectural Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jingfei Instrument Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jingfei Instrument Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Rongke New Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Rongke New Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Dongfang Sunrise Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Dongfang Sunrise Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tian Cheng Material Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tian Cheng Material Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jueqi Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jueqi Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Fuma Agriculture And Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Fuma Agriculture And Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Baogong Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Baogong Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Jiujiang Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Jiujiang Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Langtong Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Langtong Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Honest Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Honest Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Zhongyi Electric Vehicle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Zhongyi Electric Vehicle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Haizhou Packing Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Haizhou Packing Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Rixian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Rixian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Associated Engineers Zhuhai S.E.Z. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Associated Engineers Zhuhai S.E.Z. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gaozhou Qifan Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gaozhou Qifan Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026