zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Zhejiang Haizhou Packing Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Zhejiang Haizhou Packing Machine Co., Ltd. is a China-based packing and filling machine supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of 7,700+ m² and 110+ staff. The company shows a solid manufacturing base for packing machinery products, covering manual, semi-automatic, and fully automatic filling machine options with low MOQ levels of 1 set or 1 unit. On , the supplier demonstrates strong platform credibility, including 16 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and listed capabilities such as finished product inspection, full customization, ODM service, and minor customization. Its recent business performance is also relatively strong, with 200+ orders and CN¥3.9M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.9 store rating and 40+ reviews. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking established filling machine suppliers with flexible order quantities, customization capability, and strong delivery reliability. Key limitations are the lack of detailed third-party factory certification data and limited review volume.

Zhejiang Haizhou Packing Machine Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company: Zhejiang Haizhou Packing Machine Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Zhejiang, China
  • Factory area: 7,700+ m²
  • Employees: 110+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Product scope shown: manual filler, semi-automatic filling machines, fully automatic liquid filling machine
  • Factory certification information: Insufficient Data beyond verified supplier status

Elaboration

The supplier has a measurable production base with 7,700+ m² of factory area and 110+ staff, indicating a medium-sized manufacturing operation rather than a small trading-focused entity. The product listings cover different automation levels, from manual filling equipment to fully automatic liquid filling machines, suggesting that the company has a broader production or assembly capability within the filling and packing machine category.

The verified supplier status provides an additional layer of credibility, but the provided data does not include detailed factory audit reports, ISO certification, CE certification, production capacity figures, equipment lists, or export market history. Therefore, while the company appears to have a stable manufacturing foundation, its full industrial scale and formal factory certification depth cannot be fully confirmed from the available data.

Scoring Rationale

A factory area of 7,700+ m² and 110+ staff place the supplier in the medium-scale factory category. The company appears stronger than a small basic workshop due to its verified status, staff size, and diversified filling machine product range. However, the scale does not clearly reach the level of a large-scale global supply chain manufacturer, and the absence of detailed factory certifications or production capacity data prevents a top-tier score.

Final Score

17 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 16 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / industry tags:
  • Finished product inspection
  • Full customization
  • ODM service available
  • Minor customization

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates strong platform credibility. A 16-year Gold Supplier history is a significant indicator of long-term marketplace presence. Trade Assurance support also improves buyer protection during transactions, especially for machinery purchases where order value, customization, delivery timing, and after-sales communication can be important.

The presence of verified supplier status further strengthens platform trust. The listed tags also indicate operational capabilities related to inspection and customization. However, the provided certification information is limited to platform and industry tags. There is no data on external product certifications, management system certifications, export compliance documents, or third-party audit details. Therefore, the compliance profile is strong within the platform context but not fully complete from a broader international certification perspective.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets the key platform credibility indicators: long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and relevant service/inspection tags. A 16-year platform history is particularly strong. The only reason not to assign a perfect score is that external certifications or detailed compliance documentation are not provided, so full compliance depth cannot be confirmed.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 200+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥3.9M+
  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Number of reviews: 40+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded 200+ orders and CN¥3.9M+ in transaction value over the past six months, indicating active commercial performance on the platform. For machinery products, where order frequency is often lower than consumables or simple goods, 200+ orders suggests meaningful buyer activity and market validation.

The 4.9 store rating is high and supports a positive commercial track record. However, the review count of 40+ is moderate rather than extensive. This means that while the rating is strong, the available public feedback base is not very large. The transaction value and order count provide stronger evidence of business activity than the review volume alone.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows strong recent business performance, with both order volume and transaction value at a solid level. The high store rating further supports commercial reliability. The score is slightly below maximum because the review count is not large enough to fully confirm broad customer validation across a very wide buyer base.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤2h
  • Full customization: listed
  • ODM service available: listed
  • Minor customization: listed

Elaboration

The supplier provides a reported response time of ≤2 hours, which indicates relatively efficient communication. While this does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour, it still reflects a practical response level for B2B procurement communication.

The supplier also lists full customization, ODM service, and minor customization capabilities. This is relevant for filling and packing machinery buyers because equipment requirements may vary by liquid type, filling volume, nozzle configuration, production speed, and automation level. However, the provided data does not include examples of customized projects, engineering team size, design workflow, sample lead times, or after-sales service terms. As a result, the customization capability is supported by platform tags, but its technical depth cannot be fully assessed.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has clear customization indicators and a reasonable response time. Since the response time is ≤2 hours rather than ≤1 hour, and detailed service process data is not available, it does not qualify for the highest service score. Nevertheless, the combination of customization tags and acceptable communication speed supports an above-average service rating.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 98.7%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate of 98.7% is very strong. This exceeds the 90% threshold for the highest scoring range. For machinery procurement, reliable delivery is important because equipment delays may affect installation schedules, production planning, and downstream project timelines.

The data does not provide average lead time, shipping methods, export handling capability, or delay dispute history. However, the available on-time delivery rate alone is sufficient to indicate strong delivery reliability within the scoring framework.

Scoring Rationale

With an on-time delivery rate of 98.7%, the supplier clearly falls into the top delivery performance band. There is no negative delivery data provided. Therefore, a full score is justified based on the stated delivery metric.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Number of reviews: 40+
  • Finished product inspection: listed
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Factory verification / audit details: Insufficient Data beyond verified supplier status

Elaboration

The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9, which indicates positive customer feedback from available platform data. The 40+ reviews provide some buyer validation, though the volume is moderate rather than extensive. This means the rating is favorable, but the statistical depth of customer feedback is not as strong as suppliers with hundreds or thousands of reviews.

The presence of a finished product inspection tag is a positive quality-control indicator. For filling machinery, finished product inspection can be important before shipment because equipment performance, assembly quality, and functional testing directly affect buyer acceptance. The verified supplier status also supports credibility, but the provided data does not include detailed quality certifications, inspection standards, test reports, defect rates, warranty terms, or third-party factory audit results. Therefore, the quality system appears credible at the platform level, but not fully documented at an international compliance level.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier earns a strong score due to its 4.9 rating, finished product inspection capability, and verified supplier status. However, the review count is only moderate, and detailed quality assurance documentation is not provided. This prevents a perfect score, but the available indicators still support a strong quality and feedback assessment.

Final Score

18 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 17 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 18 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 18 / 20
Total Score 90 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, with standard due diligence before bulk or customized machinery orders.

Zhejiang Haizhou Packing Machine Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking filling and packing machinery from an established supplier with long platform history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, flexible MOQ, and strong recent transaction activity. It is especially suitable for small to medium-sized buyers, distributors, project-based machinery purchasers, and buyers requiring manual, semi-automatic, or fully automatic filling machine options.

Suitable customer types:
- Buyers needing low MOQ machinery procurement
- SMEs sourcing filling or packing equipment
- Buyers requiring customization or ODM support
- Buyers who value Trade Assurance and platform-verified suppliers
- Customers prioritizing strong delivery reliability

Main risks:
- External factory certifications are not provided: Insufficient Data
- Detailed factory audit reports are not provided: Insufficient Data
- Review count is moderate at 40+, despite a high 4.9 rating
- No detailed information on production capacity, lead time, after-sales service, warranty, or technical support terms

Growth potential:
The supplier shows strong potential due to its 16-year Gold Supplier history, active six-month transaction record, high delivery performance, customization capability, and verified manufacturing base. If the company can provide more complete factory audit documents, quality certifications, technical test reports, and after-sales service details, it could become a stronger candidate for larger-scale or long-term procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Henan Best Packing Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Best Packing Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Fanghua Sewing Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Fanghua Sewing Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Lingrui Sewing Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Lingrui Sewing Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Huajin Welding Machine Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Huajin Welding Machine Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Haizhou Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Haizhou Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sinocoroplast Packing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sinocoroplast Packing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Hengji Packing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Hengji Packing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haiyang Huike Packing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haiyang Huike Packing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Luck Packing Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Luck Packing Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yichuangli Packing Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yichuangli Packing Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bell Packing Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bell Packing Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yalan Packing Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yalan Packing Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bell Packing Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bell Packing Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Raiser Packing Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Raiser Packing Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Outstanding Packing Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Outstanding Packing Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Huihao Packing Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Huihao Packing Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bobo Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bobo Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Nan Yun Packing Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Nan Yun Packing Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yixing City Yulong Plastic Adhesive Packing Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yixing City Yulong Plastic Adhesive Packing Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Yuanda Boiler Corporation Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Henan Yuanda Boiler Corporation Ltd Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Yiwu Shengchun Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Shengchun Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Chaowan Furnace Industry Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Chaowan Furnace Industry Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Sibolux Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Sibolux Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Guangtou Liji Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Guangtou Liji Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chiping Dingli Steel Sleeve Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chiping Dingli Steel Sleeve Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Hongyang Cnc Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Hongyang Cnc Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Ludiao Cnc Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Ludiao Cnc Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Star Ptfe Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Star Ptfe Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Henghui International Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Henghui International Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xunguang Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xunguang Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Hugo Kitchenware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Hugo Kitchenware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Pdyear Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Pdyear Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luoyang Boying Bearing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luoyang Boying Bearing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Apotheosis International Trade Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Apotheosis International Trade Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Bolei Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Bolei Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Farthest Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Farthest Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fu Jih Compressor Industries Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fu Jih Compressor Industries Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Babolol (Shenzhen) International Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Babolol (Shenzhen) International Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinjiang Sanyao Packaging Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinjiang Sanyao Packaging Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Kn Wire Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Kn Wire Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026