Haiyang Huike Packing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Haiyang Huike Packing Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shandong, offering agricultural plastic greenhouse film and related greenhouse covering products with listed MOQs of 500 square meters. The company shows a moderate factory profile, with a reported factory area of 3,600+ m², 40+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is relatively strong, supported by 6 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and platform labels including Finished Product Inspection, Warranty Available, Business Procurement, and Low MOQ for Customization. Business activity appears moderate, with 70+ orders and CN¥743.7K+ transaction value over the past six months, though the review base is limited at 10 reviews and the store rating is 4.6. Service response is acceptable but not fast at ≤3 hours. Delivery performance is a concern, with an on-time shipment rate of 79.4%, placing it below the preferred 80% threshold. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking mid-scale agricultural film sourcing with platform-backed transaction protection, while delivery reliability should be carefully managed.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory area: 3,600+ m²
- Employees: 40+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Shandong, China
- Product scope shown: agricultural plastic greenhouse film and related greenhouse covering products

Elaboration:
Haiyang Huike Packing Co., Ltd. presents itself as a factory-based supplier with a modest but tangible production footprint. A 3,600+ m² facility and 40+ staff indicate basic manufacturing capacity rather than a large-scale industrial supply chain. The presence of verified supplier status adds credibility to the company’s operational existence and factory profile. However, the provided data does not include annual production capacity, equipment details, production lines, export volume, or factory audit reports beyond the verified supplier indicator.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier does not qualify as a large-scale manufacturer based on the available area and employee count, but it does demonstrate a real production base and verified supplier status. The factory size and staffing level support small-to-medium production capability, suitable for moderate procurement volumes. The absence of detailed production capacity data prevents a higher score.

Final Score: 14/20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 6 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry labels: Business procurement, Warranty available, Low MOQ for customization, Finished product inspection

Elaboration:
The supplier has a relatively solid platform profile. Six years as a Gold Supplier suggests a stable platform presence rather than a newly listed seller. Trade Assurance provides buyers with a transaction protection mechanism. The verified supplier status and Finished Product Inspection label further strengthen compliance credibility. However, the data does not provide details of internationally recognized certifications, such as ISO, SGS test reports, product compliance certificates, or industry-specific quality certifications.

Scoring Rationale:
The combination of 6-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and platform inspection-related labels supports a strong credibility score. The score is not placed at the maximum level because the provided data does not confirm third-party factory audit depth, formal management system certifications, or product compliance certifications.

Final Score: 17/20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in the past 6 months: 70+
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥743.7K+
- Store rating: 4.6
- Number of reviews: 10

Elaboration:
The supplier shows measurable transaction activity over the past six months. More than 70 orders and CN¥743.7K+ in transaction value indicate that the supplier has ongoing commercial demand and has completed a meaningful level of platform-based sales. The 4.6 store rating is positive, but the review count of 10 is relatively limited, making the feedback base narrow. This means the supplier’s business performance is supported by transaction data, but buyer validation depth remains moderate.

Scoring Rationale:
The order count and transaction amount suggest stable mid-level business activity rather than low commercial validation. However, the small number of reviews limits confidence in broad customer satisfaction. The 4.6 rating is favorable, but with only 10 reviews, it cannot be treated as highly robust market feedback.

Final Score: 15/20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Low MOQ for customization label: Provided
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier’s response time of ≤3 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency, though it does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response within one hour. The platform label “Low MOQ for customization” suggests some degree of customization flexibility at lower order thresholds. However, the data does not confirm Full Customization capability, dedicated engineering support, sampling lead time, design support, or multilingual service capacity.

Scoring Rationale:
Service capability appears functional and suitable for standard inquiries or moderate customization needs. The response time is reasonable but not top-tier. Because Full Customization is not confirmed and only low-MOQ customization is indicated, the supplier should receive a mid-level service score rather than a high score.

Final Score: 7/10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time shipment rate: 79.4%

Elaboration:
The supplier’s on-time shipment rate is 79.4%, which falls within the 70–79% performance band. This indicates that delivery execution is below the preferred 80% threshold and may require buyer attention when placing time-sensitive orders. The data does not include average lead time, production cycle, logistics method, delay reasons, or historical delivery trend, so the assessment is limited to the provided on-time shipment rate.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, a 70–79% on-time shipment rate corresponds to 5–6 points. Since 79.4% is near the upper end of this band but still below 80%, the supplier receives the higher score within this range. Delivery reliability remains the most visible operational risk in the available data.

Final Score: 6/10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 4.6
- Number of reviews: 10
- Finished Product Inspection label: Provided
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory Verification: Interpreted only as verified supplier status from provided data; detailed factory verification report is Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.6 and a Finished Product Inspection label, which indicates some level of quality control recognition on the platform. Verified supplier status also adds basic quality and operational credibility. However, the review count is only 10, which limits the reliability of customer feedback as a quality indicator. The data does not include defect rates, inspection reports, product test results, material specifications, warranty claim history, or detailed factory verification documentation.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates basic quality assurance signals through Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status. The rating is favorable, but the limited review volume prevents a high score. Because the quality system is not fully documented and customer feedback is not extensive, the supplier fits the “good but not deeply validated” category.

Final Score: 15/20

Total Score

Company Strength: 14/20
Platform & Compliance Credibility: 17/20
Business Performance: 15/20
Service Capability: 7/10
Delivery Performance: 6/10
Quality & Customer Feedback: 15/20

Total Score: 74/100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation Recommendation: Recommended with controlled order management.

Haiyang Huike Packing Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking agricultural greenhouse film products from a mid-sized China-based supplier with platform credibility, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and moderate recent transaction activity. It is more appropriate for small-to-medium importers, agricultural distributors, greenhouse material buyers, and buyers who can manage delivery schedules with buffer time.

Main risk points include the 79.4% on-time shipment rate, limited review base of only 10 reviews, lack of confirmed Full Customization capability, and insufficient data on formal product certifications, production capacity, and detailed factory audit documentation.

Growth potential is present due to its 6-year Gold Supplier history, verified supplier status, Finished Product Inspection label, and active transaction record. Before larger-volume procurement, buyers should request product samples, confirm lead times in writing, clarify customization capability, and use Trade Assurance for payment and delivery protection.