zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shenzhen Guangyuanda Printing And Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report

Supplier: Shenzhen Guangyuanda Printing And Packaging Co., Ltd.
Location: Guangdong, China

Shenzhen Guangyuanda Printing And Packaging Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Guangyuanda Printing And Packaging Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier in the printing and packaging sector, with listed products mainly covering customized corrugated boxes, cosmetic folding boxes, magnetic closure packaging, cardboard packaging, and one listed cap product. The company reports a factory area of 4,000+ m² and 80+ staff, indicating a medium-sized production setup with basic-to-stable manufacturing capacity. It is listed as a verified supplier and supports Trade Assurance, with 2 years as a Gold Supplier. Commercial performance is relatively solid, supported by 300+ orders and CN¥1.2M+ transaction value over the past six months, along with a 4.8 store rating and 80+ reviews. Delivery performance is moderate, with an on-time delivery rate of 84.5%. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ customized packaging with moderate transaction validation. Key limitations include limited platform history and insufficient data on formal product inspection systems or advanced customization capabilities.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Factory area: 4,000+ m²
  • Employees: 80+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Main listed products: customized corrugated packaging, cosmetic boxes, magnetic closure boxes, cardboard boxes, and one cap product listing

Elaboration

The supplier operates with a reported factory area of over 4,000 square meters and more than 80 employees. This suggests a medium-sized factory rather than a very large-scale manufacturing group. The production base appears sufficient for small-to-medium batch packaging orders, especially given the very low MOQs shown in the product listings, such as 2 pieces or 10 pieces. The verified supplier status provides some additional confidence that the supplier has undergone a level of platform-side verification.

However, the available data does not include detailed production line numbers, monthly capacity, machinery lists, quality lab information, or specific factory audit reports. Therefore, while the company shows stable basic manufacturing capability, the evidence is not enough to classify it as a large-scale or highly mature supply chain operation.

Scoring Rationale

A factory size of 4,000+ m² and 80+ employees places the supplier in the medium-sized manufacturing category. The verified supplier status supports credibility, but the absence of detailed production capacity data limits the score. Based on the provided data, the supplier demonstrates stable production capability but not enough evidence for a top-tier large-scale supplier rating.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verification status: Verified supplier: True
  • Listed certification/platform tags:
  • On-time delivery 84.5%
  • Response time ≤2h

Elaboration

The supplier has Gold Supplier status and supports Trade Assurance, which are important platform-level trust indicators. The supplier is also marked as verified, adding another layer of credibility. These elements indicate that the supplier has a basic and functional platform compliance profile.

However, the Gold Supplier history is only 2 years, which is relatively short compared with long-established suppliers. In addition, the available certification or industry tag data is limited to operational indicators such as on-time delivery and response time. There is no provided evidence of additional factory certifications, product certifications, management system certifications, or compliance documentation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform credibility indicators: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification. These support a credible sourcing profile. However, the short Gold Supplier duration and lack of broader certification details prevent a higher score. The supplier fits the category of having core platform credibility but limited certification depth.

Final Score

15 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 300+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥1.2M+
  • Store rating: 4.8
  • Number of reviews: 80+

Elaboration

The supplier shows a healthy level of recent commercial activity, with over 300 orders and more than CN¥1.2 million in transaction value over the past six months. These figures indicate that the supplier has active buyers and a measurable transaction record on the platform.

The store rating of 4.8 is strong, and 80+ reviews provide a reasonable customer feedback base. This level of performance suggests the supplier has been commercially validated to some extent, especially for buyers looking for suppliers with active platform transactions rather than unproven listings.

However, while the order volume and transaction value are solid, they do not necessarily indicate very high-volume industrial-scale procurement performance. The review count is also positive but not exceptionally large.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates stable commercial performance, supported by 300+ recent orders, CN¥1.2M+ in transactions, and a strong 4.8 rating. This supports an above-average score. The score is not placed in the maximum range because the available transaction and review figures indicate solid performance but not the highest level of market validation.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤2h
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data
  • Detailed customization capability: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time is listed as within 2 hours, which indicates acceptable communication efficiency for online sourcing. This is a positive factor for buyers who require quotation follow-up, order clarification, and sample discussion within a reasonable timeframe.

The product listings include multiple “custom” or “custom logo” items, but the provided dataset does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability. Therefore, it cannot be concluded that the supplier supports advanced customization services such as structural design, material engineering, packaging engineering, or full OEM/ODM development.

The available information supports a conclusion of normal service responsiveness, but not enough evidence is provided to rate the supplier as having strong or advanced service capability.

Scoring Rationale

A response time of ≤2h is good but does not meet the highest benchmark of ≤1h. Since Full Customization is not explicitly provided in the data, the service score should remain in the normal-to-good range rather than the top range. The supplier appears responsive, but its deeper customization capability is not sufficiently verified.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 84.5%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 84.5%, which falls within the 80%–89% performance band. This indicates moderate delivery reliability. For buyers with flexible schedules or replenishment-based packaging needs, this level may be acceptable.

However, an 84.5% on-time rate also means there is a measurable risk of delayed shipments. For time-sensitive launches, promotional campaigns, seasonal packaging programs, or strict retail delivery windows, this performance level should be reviewed carefully before placing high-priority orders.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring framework, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. At 84.5%, the supplier is in the middle of this band. The performance is acceptable but not strong enough to be considered highly reliable.

Final Score

8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.8
  • Reviews: 80+
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.8 store rating, which indicates generally positive customer feedback. The presence of 80+ reviews provides a meaningful but not extensive feedback base. This suggests that previous buyers have had mostly favorable experiences, but the review volume is not large enough to fully eliminate quality uncertainty.

The supplier is marked as verified, which supports the existence of some platform-level verification. However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier has Finished Product Inspection, third-party inspection procedures, internal QC checkpoints, or documented quality certifications. Therefore, while the rating and verification status are positive, the quality assurance system cannot be fully assessed from the current data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier receives a good score due to its 4.8 rating, 80+ reviews, and verified supplier status. However, the lack of explicit Finished Product Inspection data and limited quality system details prevent a higher score. The supplier appears to have acceptable customer satisfaction, but the formal quality control infrastructure remains insufficiently documented.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 16 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 15 / 20
Business Performance 17 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 8 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 79 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditionally Recommended for Cooperation

Shenzhen Guangyuanda Printing And Packaging Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ customized packaging products from a medium-sized Chinese supplier with active transaction records. The supplier is especially appropriate for small-to-medium buyers, e-commerce brands, trial orders, packaging sample development, and customized packaging purchases where moderate delivery risk is manageable.

Suitable Customer Types:
- Small and medium-sized brands requiring customized packaging
- E-commerce sellers needing low-MOQ packaging options
- Buyers seeking suppliers with Trade Assurance
- Customers who value responsive communication within a reasonable timeframe
- Buyers placing trial or repeat packaging orders with moderate urgency

Main Risk Points:
- Gold Supplier history is only 2 years, so long-term platform track record is limited
- On-time delivery rate of 84.5% indicates moderate delivery risk
- Full Customization capability is Insufficient Data
- Finished Product Inspection information is Insufficient Data
- No detailed production capacity, machinery, or certification data is provided

Growth Potential:
The supplier shows positive commercial momentum, supported by 300+ orders and CN¥1.2M+ transaction value in the past six months. With a 4.8 rating and verified supplier status, it has a solid foundation for continued growth. If the supplier improves delivery reliability and provides clearer evidence of quality inspection systems and customization capability, it could become a stronger candidate for larger or more structured procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Dongguan Xingkaihua Printing Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xingkaihua Printing Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinjiang Sanyao Packaging Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinjiang Sanyao Packaging Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Xinhui Printing Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Xinhui Printing Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Boxiang Packaging Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Boxiang Packaging Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhongtai Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhongtai Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jorunns Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jorunns Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Gongying Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Gongying Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ishine Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ishine Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhenghong (Shenzhen) Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhenghong (Shenzhen) Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Itis Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Itis Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen M-Star Packaging Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen M-Star Packaging Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hongyunda Gift Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hongyunda Gift Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tian Cheng Material Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tian Cheng Material Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Minghong Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Minghong Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Licai Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Licai Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Kuaima Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Kuaima Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanning Fangda Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanning Fangda Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuanming Printing (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuanming Printing (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jinguan Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jinguan Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Jin Tie Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Jin Tie Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Locat Intelligent Equipment (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Locat Intelligent Equipment (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Hongtian New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Hongtian New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu First Power Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu First Power Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenling Xinshuo Electromechanical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenling Xinshuo Electromechanical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Banghe New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Banghe New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Danone Xintong Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Danone Xintong Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Diwei Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Diwei Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningxia Huaxinda Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningxia Huaxinda Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Sanying Fluid Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Sanying Fluid Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianchang Tianjie Metalware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianchang Tianjie Metalware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yunlin Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yunlin Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wenqi Circuit Board Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wenqi Circuit Board Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Meiji Medical Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Meiji Medical Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Yangxin Dingxin Power Electronic Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Yangxin Dingxin Power Electronic Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jumei Acrylic Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jumei Acrylic Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Shengyifan Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Shengyifan Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Yuanquan Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Yuanquan Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Kenjoy New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Kenjoy New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sz Expo Hong Compos Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sz Expo Hong Compos Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Anhong Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Anhong Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026