Shenzhen Guangyuanda Printing And Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Supplier Evaluation Report
Supplier: Shenzhen Guangyuanda Printing And Packaging Co., Ltd.
Location: Guangdong, China

Executive Summary
Shenzhen Guangyuanda Printing And Packaging Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier in the printing and packaging sector, with listed products mainly covering customized corrugated boxes, cosmetic folding boxes, magnetic closure packaging, cardboard packaging, and one listed cap product. The company reports a factory area of 4,000+ m² and 80+ staff, indicating a medium-sized production setup with basic-to-stable manufacturing capacity. It is listed as a verified supplier and supports Trade Assurance, with 2 years as a Gold Supplier. Commercial performance is relatively solid, supported by 300+ orders and CN¥1.2M+ transaction value over the past six months, along with a 4.8 store rating and 80+ reviews. Delivery performance is moderate, with an on-time delivery rate of 84.5%. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ customized packaging with moderate transaction validation. Key limitations include limited platform history and insufficient data on formal product inspection systems or advanced customization capabilities.
Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Factory area: 4,000+ m²
- Employees: 80+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Main listed products: customized corrugated packaging, cosmetic boxes, magnetic closure boxes, cardboard boxes, and one cap product listing
Elaboration
The supplier operates with a reported factory area of over 4,000 square meters and more than 80 employees. This suggests a medium-sized factory rather than a very large-scale manufacturing group. The production base appears sufficient for small-to-medium batch packaging orders, especially given the very low MOQs shown in the product listings, such as 2 pieces or 10 pieces. The verified supplier status provides some additional confidence that the supplier has undergone a level of platform-side verification.
However, the available data does not include detailed production line numbers, monthly capacity, machinery lists, quality lab information, or specific factory audit reports. Therefore, while the company shows stable basic manufacturing capability, the evidence is not enough to classify it as a large-scale or highly mature supply chain operation.
Scoring Rationale
A factory size of 4,000+ m² and 80+ employees places the supplier in the medium-sized manufacturing category. The verified supplier status supports credibility, but the absence of detailed production capacity data limits the score. Based on the provided data, the supplier demonstrates stable production capability but not enough evidence for a top-tier large-scale supplier rating.
Final Score
16 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verification status: Verified supplier: True
- Listed certification/platform tags:
- On-time delivery 84.5%
- Response time ≤2h
Elaboration
The supplier has Gold Supplier status and supports Trade Assurance, which are important platform-level trust indicators. The supplier is also marked as verified, adding another layer of credibility. These elements indicate that the supplier has a basic and functional platform compliance profile.
However, the Gold Supplier history is only 2 years, which is relatively short compared with long-established suppliers. In addition, the available certification or industry tag data is limited to operational indicators such as on-time delivery and response time. There is no provided evidence of additional factory certifications, product certifications, management system certifications, or compliance documentation.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has the core platform credibility indicators: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification. These support a credible sourcing profile. However, the short Gold Supplier duration and lack of broader certification details prevent a higher score. The supplier fits the category of having core platform credibility but limited certification depth.
Final Score
15 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 300+
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥1.2M+
- Store rating: 4.8
- Number of reviews: 80+
Elaboration
The supplier shows a healthy level of recent commercial activity, with over 300 orders and more than CN¥1.2 million in transaction value over the past six months. These figures indicate that the supplier has active buyers and a measurable transaction record on the platform.
The store rating of 4.8 is strong, and 80+ reviews provide a reasonable customer feedback base. This level of performance suggests the supplier has been commercially validated to some extent, especially for buyers looking for suppliers with active platform transactions rather than unproven listings.
However, while the order volume and transaction value are solid, they do not necessarily indicate very high-volume industrial-scale procurement performance. The review count is also positive but not exceptionally large.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates stable commercial performance, supported by 300+ recent orders, CN¥1.2M+ in transactions, and a strong 4.8 rating. This supports an above-average score. The score is not placed in the maximum range because the available transaction and review figures indicate solid performance but not the highest level of market validation.
Final Score
17 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
- Detailed customization capability: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier’s response time is listed as within 2 hours, which indicates acceptable communication efficiency for online sourcing. This is a positive factor for buyers who require quotation follow-up, order clarification, and sample discussion within a reasonable timeframe.
The product listings include multiple “custom” or “custom logo” items, but the provided dataset does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability. Therefore, it cannot be concluded that the supplier supports advanced customization services such as structural design, material engineering, packaging engineering, or full OEM/ODM development.
The available information supports a conclusion of normal service responsiveness, but not enough evidence is provided to rate the supplier as having strong or advanced service capability.
Scoring Rationale
A response time of ≤2h is good but does not meet the highest benchmark of ≤1h. Since Full Customization is not explicitly provided in the data, the service score should remain in the normal-to-good range rather than the top range. The supplier appears responsive, but its deeper customization capability is not sufficiently verified.
Final Score
7 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 84.5%
Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 84.5%, which falls within the 80%–89% performance band. This indicates moderate delivery reliability. For buyers with flexible schedules or replenishment-based packaging needs, this level may be acceptable.
However, an 84.5% on-time rate also means there is a measurable risk of delayed shipments. For time-sensitive launches, promotional campaigns, seasonal packaging programs, or strict retail delivery windows, this performance level should be reviewed carefully before placing high-priority orders.
Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring framework, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. At 84.5%, the supplier is in the middle of this band. The performance is acceptable but not strong enough to be considered highly reliable.
Final Score
8 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 4.8
- Reviews: 80+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier has a 4.8 store rating, which indicates generally positive customer feedback. The presence of 80+ reviews provides a meaningful but not extensive feedback base. This suggests that previous buyers have had mostly favorable experiences, but the review volume is not large enough to fully eliminate quality uncertainty.
The supplier is marked as verified, which supports the existence of some platform-level verification. However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier has Finished Product Inspection, third-party inspection procedures, internal QC checkpoints, or documented quality certifications. Therefore, while the rating and verification status are positive, the quality assurance system cannot be fully assessed from the current data.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier receives a good score due to its 4.8 rating, 80+ reviews, and verified supplier status. However, the lack of explicit Finished Product Inspection data and limited quality system details prevent a higher score. The supplier appears to have acceptable customer satisfaction, but the formal quality control infrastructure remains insufficiently documented.
Final Score
16 / 20
Total Score
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Company Strength | 16 / 20 |
| Platform & Compliance Credibility | 15 / 20 |
| Business Performance | 17 / 20 |
| Service Capability | 7 / 10 |
| Delivery Performance | 8 / 10 |
| Quality & Customer Feedback | 16 / 20 |
| Total Score | 79 / 100 |
Procurement Recommendation
Recommendation: Conditionally Recommended for Cooperation
Shenzhen Guangyuanda Printing And Packaging Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ customized packaging products from a medium-sized Chinese supplier with active transaction records. The supplier is especially appropriate for small-to-medium buyers, e-commerce brands, trial orders, packaging sample development, and customized packaging purchases where moderate delivery risk is manageable.
Suitable Customer Types:
- Small and medium-sized brands requiring customized packaging
- E-commerce sellers needing low-MOQ packaging options
- Buyers seeking suppliers with Trade Assurance
- Customers who value responsive communication within a reasonable timeframe
- Buyers placing trial or repeat packaging orders with moderate urgency
Main Risk Points:
- Gold Supplier history is only 2 years, so long-term platform track record is limited
- On-time delivery rate of 84.5% indicates moderate delivery risk
- Full Customization capability is Insufficient Data
- Finished Product Inspection information is Insufficient Data
- No detailed production capacity, machinery, or certification data is provided
Growth Potential:
The supplier shows positive commercial momentum, supported by 300+ orders and CN¥1.2M+ transaction value in the past six months. With a 4.8 rating and verified supplier status, it has a solid foundation for continued growth. If the supplier improves delivery reliability and provides clearer evidence of quality inspection systems and customization capability, it could become a stronger candidate for larger or more structured procurement programs.
Leave your comment