Anhui Kuaima Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Anhui Kuaima Printing Co., Ltd. is a China-based packaging and printing supplier located in Anhui, with a reported factory area of 4,200+㎡ and 50+ staff. The company appears positioned as a custom paper packaging supplier, offering products such as custom luxury foil matte embossed packaging, craft gift bags, printed retail craft packaging, prescription medical brown packaging, and promotional packaging bags. Its profile shows strong platform credibility, including 16 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and operational labels such as low MOQ customization, response time within 2 hours, and 100.0% on-time delivery. Business performance is solid, with 100+ orders and CN¥2.8M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.9 store rating and 90+ reviews. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking custom printed packaging with relatively low MOQ requirements and verified platform protection, while buyers requiring advanced quality system evidence should request additional documentation.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Factory location: Anhui, China
- Factory area: 4,200+㎡
- Workforce: 50+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Product scope includes multiple custom packaging and printing-related product listings
Elaboration
The company has a physical production footprint of over 4,200㎡ and more than 50 employees, indicating a small-to-medium manufacturing operation rather than a very large-scale industrial supplier. The available data confirms verified supplier status, which supports the existence and basic credibility of the manufacturing entity. The product listings show a consistent focus on custom packaging and printed paper-based products, suggesting that the company operates within a defined manufacturing category rather than a highly fragmented trading portfolio.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates stable basic production capability through its factory size, employee count, and verified supplier status. However, the available scale indicators do not support classification as a large-scale supply chain. The company fits best within the “small to medium factory with stable basic production capacity” range. The score is placed in the upper part of the mid-range because the facility size and staff count are meaningful, and supplier verification adds credibility.
Final Score
15 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 16 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / platform labels: “Low MOQ for customization”, “Response time ≤2h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
Elaboration
The supplier has a long operating history as a 16-year Gold Supplier, which is a strong platform credibility indicator. Trade Assurance availability provides buyers with a platform-based transaction protection mechanism. Verified supplier status further strengthens confidence in the supplier’s basic business identity and platform compliance. The listed labels also support operational transparency, especially around customization MOQ, response speed, and delivery performance.
Scoring Rationale
This dimension is one of the supplier’s strongest areas. A 16-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status together represent a complete and mature platform credibility structure. While the data does not provide additional third-party management system certificates or detailed compliance certificates, the platform indicators are strong enough to justify a high score.
Final Score
19 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in past six months: 100+
- Transaction value in past six months: CN¥2.8M+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Number of reviews: 90+
Elaboration
The supplier has recorded more than 100 orders and over CN¥2.8M in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates active commercial operations and meaningful buyer engagement on the platform. A 4.9 store rating with 90+ reviews shows that the supplier has accumulated customer feedback at a reasonable level, supporting the reliability of its transaction record.
Scoring Rationale
The business data reflects stable and commercially validated performance. The six-month order volume and transaction value are both strong for a custom packaging supplier, and the high store rating further supports buyer satisfaction. The review count is positive, though not at a very large scale, so the score is high but not maximum.
Final Score
18 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Platform label: “Low MOQ for customization”
- Full Customization support: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier’s response time is reported as within 2 hours, which indicates acceptable communication efficiency for online procurement. The platform label also indicates low MOQ for customization, and several listed products are described as custom printed or custom logo packaging. However, the data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability, so this point cannot be treated as verified.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates good service responsiveness and some customization orientation based on the product listings and platform label. However, because Full Customization is not explicitly provided in the data, the supplier cannot receive the highest score in this category. The final score reflects good but not fully evidenced service capability.
Final Score
8 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate. This is a strong delivery performance indicator and directly supports reliability for buyers with scheduled replenishment, launch campaigns, or time-sensitive packaging procurement needs.
Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9 to 10 points. Since the reported figure is 100.0%, the supplier deserves the maximum score in this dimension, based strictly on the provided data.
Final Score
10 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 90+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but specific factory verification details are Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9 and more than 90 customer reviews, which supports positive customer feedback and a visible transaction history. Verified supplier status provides a basic credibility layer, but the data does not explicitly confirm Finished Product Inspection or provide detailed factory verification documentation. Therefore, quality assurance appears supported by buyer feedback and platform verification, but not fully supported by detailed inspection-system evidence.
Scoring Rationale
The high rating and review volume indicate good customer satisfaction. However, the absence of explicit Finished Product Inspection data and detailed factory verification evidence prevents a top-tier quality score. The supplier should be considered to have good feedback-based quality credibility, while buyers should still request inspection reports, production photos, samples, or quality control documentation before larger orders.
Final Score
16 / 20
Total Score
86 / 100
- Company Strength: 15 / 20
- Platform & Compliance Credibility: 19 / 20
- Business Performance: 18 / 20
- Service Capability: 8 / 10
- Delivery Performance: 10 / 10
- Quality & Customer Feedback: 16 / 20
Procurement Recommendation
Anhui Kuaima Printing Co., Ltd. is recommended for cooperation, especially for buyers seeking custom printed packaging, craft packaging, promotional packaging, and low-MOQ customization through Trade Assurance. The supplier is most suitable for small to medium-sized brands, retailers, promotional product buyers, and packaging distributors that value platform credibility, stable transaction history, responsive communication, and strong delivery performance.
The main risks are related to incomplete quality-system evidence. Finished Product Inspection is not confirmed, and detailed factory verification documentation is not provided in the available data. Buyers planning high-volume, premium packaging, or regulated-use packaging should request samples, artwork proofing, pre-shipment inspection, material specifications, and quality control records before placing large orders.
Overall, the supplier shows strong platform credibility, good recent business performance, high customer rating, and excellent reported delivery reliability. Its growth potential appears positive within custom packaging procurement, provided that buyers verify quality control procedures and product specifications before scaling order volume.
Leave your comment