Yangzhou Intelligence Solar Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Yangzhou Intelligence Solar Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Jiangsu, focusing on solar battery-related products such as 12V solar gel batteries, deep-cycle batteries, and solar power accumulators. Based on the provided data, the company shows a small-to-medium production profile, with a factory area of 2,300+㎡ and 30+ staff. Its strongest credibility indicators are platform-based: 11 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, Finished Product Inspection, warranty availability, and visible transaction performance. Over the past six months, the supplier recorded 70+ orders and CN¥6.3M+ in transaction value, indicating active commercial performance. However, the review count is limited at 9, and the on-time delivery rate of 78.6% is a notable operational risk. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking solar battery products with moderate order volumes and platform-backed transaction protection, but delivery reliability should be closely monitored before scaling cooperation.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 2,300+㎡
- Employees: 30+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory certification: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a physical factory base and a stated workforce, which indicates basic manufacturing capability. A 2,300+㎡ facility with 30+ staff suggests a relatively compact production operation rather than a large-scale industrial manufacturer. The verified supplier status improves confidence in the existence and basic legitimacy of the operation, but no detailed factory audit report, production line count, equipment list, annual capacity, or factory certification data is provided.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates real production presence and supplier verification, but the factory size and employee count are limited compared with large-scale supply chain manufacturers. Since no detailed production capacity or factory certification information is available, the score should remain within the small but operationally capable range rather than the medium or large-scale category.

Final Score: 12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 11 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / platform tags: Warranty available, Finished Product Inspection, On-time delivery 78.6%, Response time ≤2h

Elaboration
The supplier has a strong platform history, with 11 years as a Gold Supplier and Trade Assurance support. These are meaningful credibility indicators for international buyers using as a sourcing channel. The presence of Finished Product Inspection and warranty availability further strengthens the compliance and transaction protection profile. However, no independent product certifications, factory certifications, or industry-specific compliance documents are provided in the dataset.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier performs strongly in platform credibility due to long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. The score is not perfect because certification details beyond platform labels are not provided, and the available compliance evidence is mainly platform-based rather than independently documented.

Final Score: 18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 70+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥6.3M+
- Store rating: 4.5
- Reviews: 9

Elaboration
The supplier has visible commercial activity, with 70+ orders and CN¥6.3M+ in transaction value over the past six months. This indicates that the supplier is not inactive and has achieved measurable sales through the platform. The store rating of 4.5 is acceptable, but the review count of 9 is relatively low, limiting the depth of customer validation.

Scoring Rationale
Transaction value is relatively strong, and order volume shows stable commercial activity. However, the limited number of reviews weakens the reliability of customer feedback as a validation source. The score therefore reflects medium-to-good business performance, but not a top-tier level due to limited review evidence.

Final Score: 16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
- Communication efficiency: Response time ≤2h only

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within two hours indicates reasonably responsive communication. This is beneficial for buyers requiring quotation clarification, order discussion, or after-sales communication. However, there is no provided evidence of Full Customization support, design customization, private labeling, packaging customization, or engineering support.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier’s response speed is acceptable but does not meet the highest benchmark of ≤1 hour. Since customization capability is not confirmed, the service score should remain in the normal service range rather than the strong customization category.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 78.6%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 78.6%, which falls within the 70%–79% range. This indicates that delivery performance exists but is not highly reliable. For buyers with strict project timelines or seasonal delivery requirements, this could create procurement risk.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring framework, a 70%–79% on-time delivery rate corresponds to 5–6 points. Since the supplier is near the upper end of this range but still below 80%, a score of 6 is appropriate.

Final Score: 6 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.5
- Reviews: 9
- Finished Product Inspection: Available
- Factory Verification / verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a 4.5 store rating, which is generally positive. Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status provide some quality assurance structure. However, the number of reviews is only 9, which is not enough to establish a broad customer feedback base. No detailed defect rate, inspection standard, third-party quality certificate, or product-specific certification is provided.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has basic quality assurance indicators and a positive rating, but customer feedback volume is limited. The score reflects a supplier with acceptable quality signals, while recognizing that the available customer validation and quality documentation are not extensive.

Final Score: 14 / 20

Total Score

Total Score: 73 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with caution. Yangzhou Intelligence Solar Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers sourcing solar battery products in moderate volumes, especially those who value platform protection, Trade Assurance, supplier verification, and visible recent transaction activity.

The main risks are the 78.6% on-time delivery rate, limited review count, and insufficient data on factory certifications, production capacity, and customization capability. Buyers should confirm lead times, inspection standards, warranty terms, and delivery commitments before placing larger orders.

The supplier shows growth potential due to its 11-year Gold Supplier history, CN¥6.3M+ recent transaction value, and Finished Product Inspection availability, but it should first prove stronger delivery reliability and provide more quality documentation before being considered for high-volume or time-sensitive procurement.