zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Jiangsu Micoe Solar Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Jiangsu Micoe Solar Energy Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Jiangsu, with a reported factory area of over 20,000㎡ and more than 1,100 staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to have substantial manufacturing capacity and a relatively mature supplier profile on , supported by 8 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, supplier verification, and platform labels including Finished Product Inspection and Full Customization. Its product portfolio is focused on solar air conditioners and related hybrid air-conditioning solutions, with low MOQs of 5 packs, sets, or pieces across listed products.

Commercially, the supplier shows moderate-to-strong recent activity, with 70+ orders and CN¥5.4M+ transaction value over the past six months. However, its store rating of 4.6 and 30+ reviews indicate that customer feedback volume is still limited compared with top-tier high-volume exporters. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking solar air-conditioning products, OEM/customization support, and verified factory capacity, while delivery reliability and limited review depth should be monitored.

Jiangsu Micoe Solar Energy Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 20,000+㎡
- Employees: 1,100+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Jiangsu, China

Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates a large physical and labor capacity based on the provided factory size and employee count. A workforce of over 1,100 staff and a factory area exceeding 20,000㎡ suggest the company is not a small workshop-level operation, but a scaled manufacturing organization capable of supporting structured production activities.

Scoring Rationale
The combination of large factory area, substantial employee base, and verified supplier status supports a strong company-strength profile. While the data does not provide detailed production lines, annual output, equipment lists, or factory audit reports, the available indicators are sufficient to classify the supplier as a large-scale and relatively stable supply-chain participant.

Final Score
19 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 8 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verification status: Verified supplier
- Certification / industry labels: Project solutions, On-site installation, Finished product inspection, Full customization

Elaboration
The supplier has an established presence with 8 years of Gold Supplier history and Trade Assurance support. The presence of multiple platform labels, including Finished Product Inspection and Full Customization, adds credibility to its supplier profile and indicates stronger platform-level completeness than basic suppliers.

Scoring Rationale
An 8-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status represent a strong credibility foundation. The platform label set is also relatively complete. However, no independent third-party certifications, management system certificates, or product compliance certificates were provided, so the score does not reach a perfect level.

Final Score
19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 70+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥5.4M+
- Store rating: 4.6
- Reviews: 30+

Elaboration
The supplier has demonstrated active commercial performance over the past six months, with more than 70 orders and transaction value above CN¥5.4M. This indicates real market activity and buyer engagement. The 4.6 store rating is positive, though the review count of 30+ is moderate rather than extensive.

Scoring Rationale
The transaction value is meaningful, and the order count shows stable recent activity. However, compared with suppliers showing very high order volumes, larger review bases, and higher ratings, this profile is strong but not top-tier. The relatively limited number of reviews reduces the depth of customer validation.

Final Score
16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Response time: ≤3h
- Full Customization: Listed in platform labels

Elaboration
The supplier provides a documented response time within three hours and supports Full Customization according to the provided platform labels. This suggests a reasonable service framework for buyers requiring product adaptation, OEM-style cooperation, or tailored solar air-conditioning solutions.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has clear customization capability, but the response time is not within the strongest ≤1 hour benchmark. Therefore, service capability is solid and commercially usable, but not at the highest responsiveness level.

Final Score
8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 80.0%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is exactly 80.0%, which places it within the 80–89% evaluation band. This indicates acceptable but not excellent delivery reliability. Buyers with strict project timelines should pay close attention to lead times, production scheduling, and shipment commitments before placing bulk orders.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an 80–89% on-time delivery rate corresponds to 7–8 points. Since the supplier is at the lower boundary of this range, the score should remain conservative.

Final Score
7 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.6
- Reviews: 30+
- Finished Product Inspection: Listed
- Factory / supplier verification: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a positive store rating and platform-listed Finished Product Inspection, which supports a basic quality assurance framework. Verified supplier status further strengthens confidence in operational legitimacy. However, the number of reviews is only 30+, which limits the statistical strength of customer feedback.

Scoring Rationale
The rating of 4.6 is good, and the presence of Finished Product Inspection is a meaningful quality-control indicator. Still, the review base is not large enough to classify customer feedback as highly proven. No detailed defect rate, inspection standard, warranty terms, product certificates, or audit results were provided, so the score remains in the good but not excellent range.

Final Score
16 / 20

Total Score

85 / 100

Dimension Score
Company Strength 19 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 16 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 7 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total 85 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended, especially for buyers seeking solar air conditioners, hybrid AC/DC air-conditioning products, OEM customization, and project-oriented solutions. The supplier is best suited for medium to large buyers that value verified factory scale, Trade Assurance, customization capability, and established platform credibility.

Key risks include the 80.0% on-time delivery rate, which is acceptable but requires shipment schedule management, and the relatively limited review count of 30+, which restricts the depth of customer feedback validation. Buyers should confirm delivery timelines, inspection procedures, product specifications, warranty terms, and compliance documents before bulk procurement.

Overall, Jiangsu Micoe Solar Energy Co., Ltd. shows strong growth potential due to its large factory scale, 8-year Gold Supplier history, verified status, and recent transaction performance. Its profile supports trial orders and structured supplier qualification, followed by scaled cooperation if delivery and quality performance are confirmed.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Yangzhou Dongtai Solar Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Dongtai Solar Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Xiyuan Solar Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Xiyuan Solar Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Greensun Solar Energy Tech Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Greensun Solar Energy Tech Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Greensun Solar Energy Tech Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Greensun Solar Energy Tech Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Morel Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Morel Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Eksi New Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Eksi New Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Gaojie Energy Saving Equipment Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Gaojie Energy Saving Equipment Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Greensun Solar Power Supplier Evaluation
Greensun Solar Power Supplier Evaluation
Bluesun Solar Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bluesun Solar Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Intelligence Solar Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Intelligence Solar Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Yucheng Solar Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Yucheng Solar Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Pinergy Solar Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Pinergy Solar Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Trip Solar Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Trip Solar Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Solar Up Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Solar Up Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Empery Solar Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Empery Solar Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Toyon Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Toyon Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Safecloud Energy Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Safecloud Energy Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Infraswin Energy Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Infraswin Energy Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Boot Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Boot Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yuehong Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yuehong Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Hangzhou Jiuzhong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jiuzhong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Naile Holdings Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Naile Holdings Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jingmen Tanmeng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jingmen Tanmeng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Jianqiu Knitting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Jianqiu Knitting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Kaijie Sports Goods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Kaijie Sports Goods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Eta Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Eta Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sun Vision New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sun Vision New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Really Imp.& Exp. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Really Imp.& Exp. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Toma Energy Saving Science And Technology Corp.Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Toma Energy Saving Science And Technology Corp.Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Fuding Huage Locomotive Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuding Huage Locomotive Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kunshan Yiyue Cleaning Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kunshan Yiyue Cleaning Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kingjoy Forge Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Kingjoy Forge Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Top Oil Purifier Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Top Oil Purifier Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Medsinglong Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Medsinglong Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zibo Scaler Composite Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zibo Scaler Composite Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hongyu Stage Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hongyu Stage Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Ruibao Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Ruibao Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Saga Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Saga Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Yangchen Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Yangchen Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Remax Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Remax Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026