Yiwu Jianqiu Knitting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Yiwu Jianqiu Knitting Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, positioned in the knitted and winter glove category, including children’s plush gloves, touchscreen anti-slip gloves, furry cold-proof gloves, cartoon knitted gloves, and men’s/women’s winter gloves. The company reports a factory area of over 2,800㎡ and more than 40 staff, with supplier verification indicated as true. Its product MOQs are very low, generally 2 pairs or 2 sets, suggesting suitability for small-batch buyers, sample testing, e-commerce sellers, and buyers requiring flexible order quantities. The supplier has Gold Supplier status for 1 year and provides Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, Full Customization, and Minor Customization labels. However, Trade Assurance is not supported, and key business performance data such as six-month order volume, transaction value, store rating, and customer reviews are either missing or zero. Overall, this supplier shows basic manufacturing and customization capability, but commercial validation and buyer feedback remain insufficient.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company name: Yiwu Jianqiu Knitting Co., Ltd.
• Country/Region: China, Zhejiang
• Factory area: 2,800+㎡
• Employees: 40+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported physical production base of over 2,800㎡ and a workforce of more than 40 employees. This indicates the company has an established operational setup rather than being purely a trading entity based on the provided data. The verified supplier status also adds a degree of structural credibility to its company profile.

However, the scale remains relatively modest when compared with larger industrial suppliers. A workforce of 40+ staff and a factory size of 2,800+㎡ suggest small-to-medium production capacity rather than large-scale mass manufacturing capability. No additional data is provided regarding production lines, monthly capacity, machinery, annual output, export volume, or major factory audit certifications beyond the verified supplier indicator.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic manufacturing strength with a physical factory, staff base, and supplier verification. This supports its ability to handle small to moderate procurement needs, particularly in low-MOQ winter glove categories. However, the available data does not prove large-scale supply-chain stability or high-volume production capacity. The lack of detailed production capacity and factory certification information limits the score.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
• Trade Assurance: False
• Certification/industry labels:
• Finished product inspection
• ODM service available
• Full customization
• Minor customization
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier holds Gold Supplier status, but the membership duration is only 1 year. This indicates a relatively new platform credibility record. The supplier is also marked as verified, which provides some confidence in the accuracy of its company profile. The presence of Finished Product Inspection and customization-related labels supports a certain level of platform completeness.

However, the absence of Trade Assurance is a notable limitation from a procurement risk-control perspective. Trade Assurance is commonly used by buyers to manage payment security, delivery commitments, and dispute handling. Since this supplier does not support it according to the provided data, transaction protection is weaker. In addition, the Gold Supplier duration is short, and no external certifications such as ISO, BSCI, Sedex, OEKO-TEX, or similar compliance documents are provided.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has several useful platform credibility signals, including Gold Supplier status, supplier verification, and inspection/customization labels. Nevertheless, the short Gold Supplier history and lack of Trade Assurance reduce confidence for buyers seeking stronger transaction security and long-term platform credibility. The compliance profile is acceptable at a basic level but not comprehensive.

Final Score

12 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: Insufficient Data
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: Insufficient Data
• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration

The available data does not include recent order quantity, transaction value, or store rating. The number of reviews is listed as 0, which means there is no visible customer feedback record in the provided dataset. This makes it difficult to verify actual commercial traction, repeat buyer activity, order fulfillment experience, or customer satisfaction through platform transaction history.

Although the product listings show low MOQs and competitive unit price ranges, these product-level indicators do not substitute for confirmed business performance. Without transaction volume, order history, buyer ratings, or reviews, the supplier’s commercial validation remains weak.

Scoring Rationale

Business performance is one of the weakest areas in this assessment. The absence of six-month order and transaction data, combined with zero reviews and missing store rating, prevents strong validation of marketplace demand or buyer satisfaction. The supplier may still be operational, but the available evidence does not support a high business-performance score.

Final Score

6 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤6h
• Full Customization: Available
• Minor Customization: Available
• ODM service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier provides a communication response time of within 6 hours, which is acceptable for general international sourcing communication. It also lists Full Customization, Minor Customization, and ODM service availability. This suggests the supplier can support buyers requiring design adjustment, product modification, or customized glove solutions within the stated product category.

However, the response time is not within 1 hour, which would represent a stronger service capability under the scoring framework. There is also no additional data on quotation speed, sample lead time, dedicated account management, multilingual support, or after-sales handling.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows good service flexibility due to the presence of full customization, minor customization, and ODM service. The response time of ≤6h is reasonable but not top-tier. Because customization capability is clearly indicated but communication speed is not at the highest level, the supplier fits the upper range of normal service capability rather than excellent service performance.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate. Based on the scoring framework, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the highest scoring range. This is a positive indicator for procurement planning, especially for seasonal winter accessories where delivery timing can directly affect sales windows.

However, the dataset does not provide the number of orders behind this on-time delivery rate. Therefore, while the percentage is excellent, the statistical depth is unclear. If the rate is based on very few orders, its reliability would be less conclusive. Since no order count is provided, this limitation should be noted.

Scoring Rationale

The stated on-time delivery rate fully meets the highest delivery-performance benchmark. Despite the lack of supporting order volume data, the available delivery metric itself is strong and justifies a top score within this dimension.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Number of reviews: 0
• Finished Product Inspection: Available
• Verified supplier: True
• Factory verification/supplier verification: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a Finished Product Inspection label and is marked as a verified supplier, which provides some quality assurance structure. Finished Product Inspection indicates that the supplier has at least a stated process or service related to checking completed goods before shipment. Supplier verification also supports basic credibility regarding the company’s profile.

However, customer feedback data is very limited. The store rating is missing, and the review count is 0. This means there is no visible buyer-side evidence regarding product consistency, defect rates, packaging quality, communication quality, or after-sales handling. In quality assessment, inspection capability is useful, but buyer feedback is also important for validating actual fulfillment performance.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has basic quality-support indicators through Finished Product Inspection and verification status. However, the absence of store rating and customer reviews significantly limits the ability to confirm real market quality performance. Therefore, the supplier should be considered to have preliminary quality assurance capability, but not enough customer-validated evidence for a high score.

Final Score

12 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation is recommended for small-batch or trial orders, but not yet recommended as a primary high-volume supplier without further verification.

Yiwu Jianqiu Knitting Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers sourcing winter gloves, children’s gloves, knitted gloves, touchscreen gloves, and customized glove products with low MOQ requirements. The very low MOQ of 2 pairs or 2 sets makes the supplier appropriate for sample testing, small e-commerce sellers, boutique retailers, promotional product buyers, and early-stage product validation.

The main strengths are its verified supplier status, physical factory scale of 2,800+㎡, 40+ staff, customization options, ODM availability, Finished Product Inspection label, and excellent stated on-time delivery rate of 100.0%.

The main risks are the lack of Trade Assurance, only 1 year of Gold Supplier history, missing six-month transaction and order data, missing store rating, and zero customer reviews. These gaps create uncertainty around commercial reliability, quality consistency, and actual buyer satisfaction.

Growth potential exists if the supplier builds more transaction history, accumulates customer reviews, maintains delivery performance, and strengthens platform protection or compliance documentation. For procurement teams, the recommended approach is to begin with sample orders or small trial batches, verify product quality independently, confirm customization details in writing, and request additional factory, inspection, and transaction references before scaling order volume.